Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Go5G Plus is, I guess, the same as Go5G Next but it's a new phone every two years instead of every year.

Looks like the standard rate is $80/mo for two lines, but when I did a chat w/ T-Mobile, they said they'd let me keep my "insider" discount and it will be $60/mo per line for me.

So $120/mo for 2 lines (wife and myself) and I should get $1k towards the 15 Pro when we trade in our 12 Pros next month. Pretty good deal I think if it holds up and they honor it (rep said he put notes on my account... we'll see). Hoping the base 15 Pro doesn't get a price hike 🤞
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
Every "incredible new plan" from all of the majors seems to revolve around extracting about $100-$130 out of each household. Plan names and select benefits continuously change but its always attempting to average about $115/month.

I just looked up U.S. averages:
  • Individual cell service averages $113/month
  • Family plans average $170/month
To average those prices means that many are paying a lot MORE than that to pull up those paying much less via MVNO providers.

If you care about your hard-earned money, seek out MVNO options, many using the exact same cellular backbone for much less cost. You may not get some "free perks" but you can likely get any perks offered by other means without locking in for so much relative cost every month for 12 or 24 months.

If a majority of consumers would ever (re)learn to "just say no" to such prices, prices will come down. Else, when the crowd just rolls over and pays whatever sellers ask, we reward those who keep cooking up ways to extract ever-more money out of all of us. Value your money... or lose it.
Just wondering, why don’t people do a plan with extended family or friends? It works out to a lot less and becomes much more feasible that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dark_Omen
Just wondering, why don’t people do a plan with extended family or friends? It works out to a lot less and becomes much more feasible that way.
Because then they wouldn't be able to complain about their $30/month phone plan with unlimited talk, text, data, and 15 GB of hotspot included on a network that works when the network is congested.
 
Just wondering, why don’t people do a plan with extended family or friends? It works out to a lot less and becomes much more feasible that way.
I believe this would sum up the answer to that good question very well...


In other words, even family & friends will have the one bad apple that will burn up too much data (slowing it down for everyone else) or make a bunch of international calls at added cost but be slow to pay, etc. Friendships and even family bonds can break over money matters.

And much like Netflix putting the pinch on sharing access in different households, if the goal IS to extract about $115 per household, I would guess that mass embrace of a friends & family pool at many addresses would lead the cell phone providers to implement the same IF it cut into maintaining and/or growing the average.

IMO again: best option to all of these "new plans" that all revolve around extracting about $100-$130 per household is "just say no." MVNOs are generally using the same networks, the same towers, the same 5G, etc but can cost considerably less than the "big 3."
 
Last edited:
There's literally always a way to upgrade every year. It's a little crazy they keep rebranding their plans and pretending they're new. What was it called last time? Next? Honestly buy a phone and keep it every 2-4 years. No one needs a new phone every damn year.
 
No, I don't pay absurd amounts of money for "unlimited" data. WiFi is readily available all over the place.
Good for you. Everyone has a different lifestyle. If I do construction work and need to access my laptop/internet from my truck, then hotspot is very useful to me.
 
Good for you. Everyone has a different lifestyle. If I do construction work and need to access my laptop/internet from my truck, then hotspot is very useful to me.

We have a $20/mo unlimited plan from AT&T for our car's hotspot.
 
I’m upgrading this year first time i extended the window to 3 years now. I was on 2 years since original iPhone but 3 years feels good to me.
who cares about upgrading every year? Seems pointless in todays age where everything in the last few years has been very very good.
honestly I feel like my 12p max is totally fine for another few years on top of this but the battery has degraded too much and I might as well take advantage of the high trade in value now then get nothing for it in 5 years. I get basically top amount up to 3 years then it drops off
 
I believe this would sum up the answer to that good question very well...


In other words, even family & friends will have the one bad apple that will burn up too much data (slowing it down for everyone else) or make a bunch of international calls at added cost but be slow to pay, etc. Friendships and even family bonds can break over money matters.

And much like Netflix putting the pinch on sharing access in different households, if the goal IS to extract about $115 per household, I would guess that mass embrace of a friends & family pool at many addresses would lead the cell phone providers to implement the same IF it cut into maintaining and/or growing the average.

IMO again: best option to all of these "new plans" that all revolve around extracting about $100-$130 per household is "just say no." MVNOs are generally using the same networks, the same towers, the same 5G, etc but can cost considerably less than the "big 3."
Data doesn't slow down on the unlimited plans through Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T unless the network is severely congested, and even then, those paying for the top tier plan (about the same price before autopay and workplace discounts) still get priority over everyone else except for those on a FirstNet network (built with AT&T).

I find it hard to believe the vast majority of users are making international calls, so that situation doesn't apply to 99% of the account holders out there.

Accounts from the "big three" are under one person's name, so it's nearly impossible to implement "cuts" because multiple people are under the same account but live in different households.

Oh, and the cheap carriers thrive off of the towers built by the "big three" so if they "big three" really wanted to, they would stop leasing towers to decrease competition.
 
Data doesn't slow down on the unlimited plans through Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T unless the network is severely congested, and even then, those paying for the top tier plan (about the same price before autopay and workplace discounts) still get priority over everyone else except for those on a FirstNet network (built with AT&T).

I find it hard to believe the vast majority of users are making international calls, so that situation doesn't apply to 99% of the account holders out there.

Accounts from the "big three" are under one person's name, so it's nearly impossible to implement "cuts" because multiple people are under the same account but live in different households.

Oh, and the cheap carriers thrive off of the towers built by the "big three" so if they "big three" really wanted to, they would stop leasing towers to decrease competition.

Are you sure about the first paragraph because I see gripes about slowing down when too much "unlimited" is used all the time. I am under the impression that there is a general MAXIMUM that can be used in a period of time, after which those using that deal will have slower connections: still technically "unlimited" but no longer fast unlimited. But maybe that has finally changed since I last seriously looked at plans.

Again, the point was "one bad apple" making international calls. It doesn't take many. Pool a big family together or a bunch of friends. At any given time, does someone go on a Cruise? Travel out of the included zone? If the pool was maybe 12 people and each took an international vacation/trip once per year, every month might have someone making out of market calls. And then the plan figurehead may find themselves with the aggravation of playing "collections" agent, "surprised" travelers being slow to pay the extra bill, etc.

The Netflix password sharing issue is also under one person's name. However, it is incredibly easy to notice that calls are being made from the general vicinity of the household and also from distant locations. Say we can get 3 families to pool together: one in NYC, one in Chicago and one in LA. Cell companies could easily see the splits and that this "one household" is making 3 pools of many calls in NYC, Chicago and LA. This the same as Netflix noticing movies being watched in NYC, in Chicago and in LA on the same account... not occasionally like someone who is traveling might do... but consistently like whoever is also using that account LIVES at those distant locations, not in the billed household.

Part of getting to become the "big 3" required concessions in support of MVNOs. If they put that kind of pinch on MVNOs to basically reduce the market to just them, GOV would likely step in and seek breakups. See the AT&T story from back in the 1980s. GOV will actually take actions like that at times. I know: that seems impossible in America in the 2020s. But even the U.S. doesn't want competition to get too small (even though one could easily argue on 3 players of size is too small).

The main point though is the idea of pooling a whole bunch of people together to try to make the average cost for each phone user be lower in any kind of friend & families opportunity is a good one. It's the actual implementation and execution by those friends & families that is tough. The MVNO option is much easier to implement and gets immediate results. No collections. No managing bad apples. Etc.
 
Last edited:
Are you sure about the first paragraph because I see gripes about slowing down when too much "unlimited" is used all the time. I am under the impression that there is a general MAXIMUM that can be used in a period of time, after which those using that deal will have slower connections: still technically "unlimited" but no longer fast unlimited. But maybe that has finally changed since I last seriously looked at plans.

Again, the point was "one bad apple" making international calls. It doesn't take many. Pool a big family together or a bunch of friends. At any given time, does someone go on a Cruise? Travel out of the included zone? If the pool was maybe 12 people and each took an international vacation/trip once per year, every month might have someone making out of market calls. And then the plan figurehead may find themselves with the aggravation of playing "collections" agent, "surprised" travelers being slow to pay the extra bill, etc.

The Netflix password sharing issue is also under one person's name. However, it is incredibly easy to notice that calls are being made from the general vicinity of the household and also from distant locations. Say we can get 3 families to pool together: one in NYC, one in Chicago and one in LA. Cell companies could easily see the splits and that this "one household" is making 3 pools of many calls in NYC, Chicago and LA. This the same as Netflix noticing movies being watch in NYC, in Chicago and in LA on the same account.

Part of getting to become the "big 3" required concessions in support of MVNOs. If they put that kind of pinch on MVNOs to basically reduce the market to just them, GOV would likely step in and seek breakups. See the AT&T story from back in the 1980s.

The main point though is the idea of pooling a whole bunch of people together to try to make the average cost for each phone user be lower in any kind of friend & families opportunity is a good one. It's the actual implementation and execution by those friends & families that is tough. The MVNO option is much easier to implement and gets immediate results. No collections. No managing bad apples. Etc.
10 person per line maximum, except under special business accounts. International plan on AT&T charges $10 per day (when used), up to a maximum of $100 and it goes on your bill and the person simply pays it when they normally pay -- there shouldn't be an issue there.

I honestly don't think AT&T or any carrier cares where you live for many reasons - the more PPV accounts, the better. The more PPV accounts, the more insurance plans, NextUp, and other set services they can sell, and there's more usage that doesn't happen on their competitors. If the big three didn't give per line discounts, they'll lose a lot of business.
 
Tried that with my Ram. There seems to be an issue with AT&T and UConnect, but not everyone's vehicle has the capability either.
Our vehicle is Mazda. The only problem we've experienced with the service is the cap of 5 devices simultaneously on the hotspot.
 
Sure, and have fun with a lack of priority during busy times of the day, and dealing with customer service reps from the Philippines when you call. I'm also willing to bet you don't get 100 GB of hotspot usage availability every month. I can also guarantee one of two things -- either you don't have unlimited data, or your cell phone carrier advertises "unlimited" data, but will cut off your service when you reach a certain threshold because you "broke their ToS." You get what you pay for... What is considered "nuts" to you, is actually a premium version of cell phone service if someone only has one line to pay for (most have 3-4 lines per account).

How much do you spend on your car payment every month... $500? $600? $700? -- $100 is nothing for a service you use/rely on basically 24/7/365.
Can’t speak for the person you quoted, but I pay $40/month on Visible and get 50 GB of priority data on LTE and nationwide 5G, and unlimited priority data on 5G UW. I haven’t had to contact CS since I switched, and I’m sure not about to pay $60/month more for better CS regardless.
 
Every "incredible new plan" from all of the majors seems to revolve around extracting about $100-$130 out of each household. Plan names and select benefits continuously change but its always attempting to average about $115/month.

I just looked up U.S. averages:
  • Individual cell service averages $113/month
  • Family plans average $170/month
To average those prices means that many are paying a lot MORE than that to pull up those paying much less via MVNO providers.

If you care about your hard-earned money, seek out MVNO options, many using the exact same cellular backbone for much less cost. You may not get some "free perks" but you can likely get any perks offered by other means without locking in for so much relative cost every month for 12 or 24 months.

If a majority of consumers would ever (re)learn to "just say no" to such prices, prices will come down. Else, when the crowd just rolls over and pays whatever sellers ask, we reward those who keep cooking up ways to extract ever-more money out of all of us. Value your money... or lose it.
I use MVNO Spectrum Mobile (Verizon) and I can tell you this...we MVNO customers gets the leftover bandwidth and reception compared to cadillac Verizon full service customers. It's not even close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LightProtector
$100/month is nuts. On prepaid, I can pay $25/month for cell service. If I sell my iPhone for a $400 loss every year, that’s $33/month for a total of $55/month. I can’t see how this would ever make sense financially unless you’re on a family plan.
I’m using Mint for $20/mo (15 GB 5G data plan) as my average monthly data consumption is about 11 GB.
$100/mo for mobile seems insane for me for such low quality, speed and coverage as mobile operators have in US. I was paying $130/mo in Dubai for unlimited plan, but they have real 5G speeds there (around 800 Mbit/s) and you can access it even in the desert.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
I’m done with Apple Upgrade Program. Each year, the phone is marginally better and it’s annoying to have to restore a new one each year. First world problem of course because Apple has made the process much simpler than it used to be. Just paid off my 13PM and will keep it until the 2024 model is released. Maybe. Probably gonna get my battery replaced next year and see how things go. Usb type C iPhone is appealing but I want a Mini.
 
I already do this though? It's called the iPhone Upgrade Program. And I'm grandfathered with T-Mobile, three lines and unlimited tablet data for $74/mo + $8/mo per line if it goes over 2GB.
 
I buy the top of the line iPhone and keep it for 5 years. I give the my old one to my Dad when I upgrade and he gets another 5 years out of it. Upgrading every year seems excessive.
Isn’t the battery shot and it aged out of updates by 5 years?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.