Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I assume the 32GB and 64GB are $100 more respectively when putting down a down payment?

Also, is there T-Mobile LTE in NYC? I thought it wasn't arriving until June, how were they able to test the LTE?
 
that HD voice is the only thing that interests me

HD Voice sounds wonderful. More than anything else, I've always wanted smartphones to sound as good as a landline. Of course it requires a T-Mobile to T-Mobile call unfortunately.

WAY back in the day I worked for a cell phone company, we're talking the analog cell phone days. An analog cell phone with quality speaker/mics and good reception sounded every bit as good as the landline. Digital brought with it way too much compression and sound quality suffered.

I remember customers indicated in surveys back then that what they wanted was better sound quality, not the Internet, or apps, or price, or any other feature. We kept our sound quality up compared to the competition. The competition decided to reduce voice quality and offer a cheaper price. Due to the surveys, we thought we were position better.

Unfortunately everyone flocked to the cheaper companies. In other words, customers in surveys wanted better voice quality but when it came to actually buy a service, low price ruled the day. And that's why voice service on a cellphone sucks so much today.
 
$70 is great for all this unlimited stuff - but you've forgot to tack on another $20 for the "phone loan".

$90 grand total. It's great marketing though to artificially make your pricing look so low so since all of NA is used to looking at the monthly with subsidies.

So true, and to add to that T-Mobile is artificially making it appear there's no contract when in essence there really is. If they are having customers pay for the phone via installment billing then if they were to cancel before the phone is paid for the customer will still owe the balance. From the way I see it (unless I don't have the whole story straight) it's still a contract, just fancy marketing to cover it up.
 
The current iPhone supports AWS LTE - which is where my confusion was as every article is talking about 3G AWS without specifically mentioning it.

I doubt it will affect resale that much as current iPhone 5 users can use both T-Mobile's and AT&T's LTE. You will just need the tweaked phone for t-mobile's places that haven't refarmed 3G to 1900.

The current iPhone 5 works on HSPA+21Mbps on the 1900MHz band with the network refarm and 1700MHz LTE. The iPhone 5 releasing on April 12th will work on all the above plus HSPA+42 Mbps on the 1700MHz band.

It will have a big impact on resale value.
 
The current iPhone 5 works on HSPA+21Mbps on the 1900MHz band with the network refarm and 1700MHz LTE. The iPhone 5 releasing on April 12th will work on all the above plus HSPA+42 Mbps on the 1700MHz band.

It will have a big impact on resale value.

I understand - I doubt it will cause much of a "decrease" for current iphones.

Maybe $10~$20 but not much more as you still have a large chunk of people who couldn't care less about 1700 3G. Also the "current" iPhone 5 supports HSPA+42 on 1900 - t-mobile just currently caps it at 21Mbps.
 
HD voice = AMAZING!

HD voice sounds amazing on Rogers and FIDO networks between iPhone 5's.
It sounds like you are talking to some one right beside you, very very close to night and day difference ;)
 
The HD voice sounds great, but I hear you only get to enjoy it if you are calling another T-mobile phone over their LTE network. Most people I know are on AT&T or Verizon so until they support it this will almost be pointless.

The exception is if an entire family switches to T-mobile in an LTE city. I guess then they could at least hear clearer calls to each other. It's gonna take FOREVER for T-mobile to get anywhere close to the LTE coverage that Verizon or AT&T has.
 
this isn't any cheaper than anyone else for those who upgrade after every couple or whenever eligible. All they're doing is shifting around the #'s

$70 is great for all this unlimited stuff - but you've forgot to tack on another $20 for the "phone loan".

$90 grand total. It's great marketing though to artificially make your pricing look so low so since all of NA is used to looking at the monthly with subsidies.

This does allow you to get every new iphone when it comes out, and sell the old one. If the T-Mobile iPhone has access to all the frequencies of ATT and TMobile at their max speeds, it will be valuable as a used phone. So you'd be able to sell it (for $300?), pay off what you owe ($240), and start again with a new phone ($100 buy-in). You can't do this with ATT as easily, as you have to cancel your contract, pay the early termination, and I'm not sure if they give you full subsidy again. And ATT partial subsidy is a far worse deal that TMobile's pricing.

I'm not switching because of my wife's FAN discount on ATT, but I can see non-discounted customers switching.
 
this isn't any cheaper than anyone else for those who upgrade after every couple or whenever eligible. All they're doing is shifting around the #'s

$70 is great for all this unlimited stuff - but you've forgot to tack on another $20 for the "phone loan".

$90 grand total. It's great marketing though to artificially make your pricing look so low so since all of NA is used to looking at the monthly with subsidies.

Yeah but you forget that there is no unlimited option on Verizon or AT&T at all. The AT&T 3GB plan is $90 and their taxes/fees are also higher. It's more comparable to the T-Mobile $80 plan that has 2GB. Also all of these plans except the unlimited include hotspot. Want hotspot on AT&T? Your bill is automatically $105 before the taxes/fees.

Add in the benefit that there is never the worry of an extra $15 tacked onto T-Mobile if you happen to go over your allotted data, you just get slowed down and they are pretty clear about what the throttle limits are. What good is all that amazing LTE when you can't even use it without always having to worry about your bill going up by $15?
 
cool, i don't imagine there will be tmobile lte in my area for quite some time, good news.

T-Mobile has already announced (and reiterated today) that they'll have LTE across their whole network by the end of 2013.
 
Does anyone know why Verizon's network speeds are slower than those of AT&T or T-Mobile???

I thought Verizon has always been considered the best. :confused:

You buy Verizon for reliability and coverage. AT&T for speed. T-Mobile or Sprint for value.
 
HD Voice sounds wonderful. More than anything else, I've always wanted smartphones to sound as good as a landline. Of course it requires a T-Mobile to T-Mobile call unfortunately.

WAY back in the day I worked for a cell phone company, we're talking the analog cell phone days. An analog cell phone with quality speaker/mics and good reception sounded every bit as good as the landline. Digital brought with it way too much compression and sound quality suffered.

Totally. I still remember that my first cell phone, a Motorola StarTAC, had very respectable call quality when set on analog mode (never mind that it would physically heat up in the process). In particular, it had much less of the "walkie-talkie" effect wherein only one person can really be talking at a time. Full duplex is a wonderful thing that landlines have and compressed cellphone signals really don't.

I have often wished phone carriers would allot more bandwidth to, you know, the "phone" part of having a phone.
 
Why would they bother? They are both constantly adding more customers every quarter whereas TMobile is losing people.

Let's not forget VZW/AT&T probably have more LTE out there than TMo has 3G right now. THeir coverage and customer service are medicare.

You truly get what you pay for.

How do you think AT&T would be doing without the iPhone? Probably not as well. T-Mobile is just getting it so it will gain more customers with that plus the cheaper prices. Can you get a iP5 on AT&T for $99? No, you cant!

Why do you think AT&T wanted to buy T-Mobile? Because they wanted their network.....which now is faster than AT&T's.

----------

T-Mobile has already announced (and reiterated today) that they'll have LTE across their whole network by the end of 2013.

Here in Vegas, it should be online but i dont have a LTE phone. My GS3 isnt capable i dont think.
 
Last edited:
guess I just have a good deal then....

I pay $140 a month for 2 iphone 5's - 450 shard minutes - both unlimited data and texts....

That equates to $70 a month (only bonus would be unlimited voice but don't need it).

That $70 also includes my subsidy, it wouldn't with t-mobile.

I do get an 18% employer discount on ATT, but still.....

I was looking at the T-Mobile deal today and trying to figure out what I would be paying. For (2) iPhones would be $80 + $40 = $120/month. With my employer discount of 15% this would become $68 + $40 = $108 or $54/month for each iPhone. Plus I would only have to put out up front $198 (T-mobile) vs $389 (AT&T, Verizon and Sprint) for two iPhone 5(s). The unlocked iPhone 5 is $649 from Apple vs at the end of the T-Mobile contract I would be paying $99+480=$579.

So $54/month/phone for unlimited minutes, text (not that important to me) and data is a hell of good deal. That aside, I am still concerned about the data speeds I would be getting in my area in Michigan with T-Mobile which would be 3G right now. I am with Sprint right now and the data speeds are worse then horrible. Unlimited data plan, what a joke.
 
Meanwhile........

photosnj.png
 
Meanwhile........

Image

1KDzt


AT&T in Boston

----------

How do you think AT&T would be doing without the iPhone? Probably not as well. T-Mobile is just getting it so it will gain more customers with that plus the cheaper prices. Can you get a iP5 on AT&T for $99? No, you can't!
No, you're paying $99 up front and financing it (basically like a credit card, at a subsidized price) over the term, as long as it takes to pay off the phone. If you leave early, you owe TMobile the excess money.

Why do you think AT&T wanted to buy T-Mobile?

Might want to read up on that. AT&T was going to dismantle their network anyways. They wanted to buy T-Mobile for their spectrum, that's it. Take down their AWS 3G and put up AWS LTE to supplement their 700mhz network for congestion, etc (what VZW will start doing soon, in high traffic areas like NYC)

Because they wanted their network.....which now is faster than AT&T's.

hardly. Your fast speeds are gone once you leave the city and you're stuck on BLAZING FAST EDGE, whereas AT&T/VZW have LTE.

T-Mobile can't touch these speeds and they're on a loaded network in Boston, not some tested macro-cell that TMobile was using to show off LTE.

20130326164207.png


Here in Vegas, it should be online but i dont have a LTE phone. My GS3 is capable but probably have to get a update from TMo.
No, it's not. They're going to start selling a new LTE version of the S3. You're thinking of the Note 2.

----------

interesting article from BGR

http://bgr.com/2013/03/26/t-mobiles...+TheBoyGeniusReport+(BGR+|+Boy+Genius+Report)

Just as you should always be especially wary of politicians who run for office by claiming that they aren’t politicians, so too should you be wary of profit-seeking companies who claim that they’re not only after your wallet. I mention this particular public relations technique because it happens to be the same strategy that T-Mobile is employing with its “UNcarrier” initiative, a clever attempt to rebrand the company as a consumer-friendly alternative to the twin evil empires of Verizon (VZ) and AT&T (T).

During an expletive-laden tirade on Tuesday, T-Mobile CEO John Legere tapped into consumer anger at America’s two largest wireless companies for pushing two-year contracts in exchange for subsidized smartphones, for slapping customers with overage fees for exceeding monthly data limits and for writing complex, hard-to-understand service agreements.

“This is the biggest crock of s— I’ve ever heard in my entire life,” he said at one point of the mobile industry’s practices. “Do you have any idea how much you’re paying? Customers love smartphones, everyone hates contracts… if you come to T-Mobile, you’ve signed your last contract.”

All of this sounds nice — LTE data overage fees truly are ridiculous, two-year service agreements are irritating and it would be nice to have simpler billing practices from wireless carriers. But how much better is the deal that T-Mobile is offering you over those of its rivals? The answer is, “Better but not by as much as T-Mobile wants you to think.”

Let’s consider the payment plan that T-Mobile is offering users who want to pay low prices for new smartphones. The carrier lets users buy big-name smartphones such as the iPhone 5 and Galaxy S4 for $99 up front while then making $20 monthly payments for the next 24 months to pay off the rest of the cost of the device. So even if you decide to ditch T-Mobile’s service after just one month on the network, you’re still on the hook to pay the carrier $20 a month for the next two years unless you want to turn your device in.

This may not sound so bad, you say, because at least you’ll have the freedom to stop paying T-Mobile monthly service fees. This is certainly true, but you won’t be taking your shiny new smartphone with you when you go because T-Mobile will not let you unlock it until you’ve fully paid off the cost of the device. So if you leave T-Mobile shortly after buying a phone, you’re essentially stuck with a brick that you either have to pay off in full right away or return to T-Mobile before you can really move on to a new carrier.

So what’s the advantage to signing onto a T-Mobile plan, then? Well, it is nice to pay less up front for your smartphone and to not be forced into paying T-Mobile for wireless service that you’re unhappy with for two years. And while T-Mobile will throttle your data down to lower speeds on capped plans if you exceed your monthly LTE data limit, it won’t gouge you with overage fees as AT&T and Verizon do. And T-Mobile has generally tried to make its data plans more affordable than its larger rivals’ plans, which should only continue if the company is successful in its attempts to buy MetroPCS (PCS).

The bottom line here is that while T-Mobile’s plans are a welcome change from the status quo, consumers should keep their expectations in check for what they will and will not deliver. To use Legere’s own colorful language, the world’s second-biggest crock of s— can still be pretty big.
 
Image

AT&T in Boston

----------


No, you're paying $99 up front and financing it (basically like a credit card, at a subsidized price) over the term, as long as it takes to pay off the phone. If you leave early, you owe TMobile the excess money.



Might want to read up on that. AT&T was going to dismantle their network anyways. They wanted to buy T-Mobile for their spectrum, that's it. Take down their AWS 3G and put up AWS LTE to supplement their 700mhz network for congestion, etc (what VZW will start doing soon, in high traffic areas like NYC)



hardly. Your fast speeds are gone once you leave the city and you're stuck on BLAZING FAST EDGE, whereas AT&T/VZW have LTE.

T-Mobile can't touch these speeds and they're on a loaded network in Boston, not some tested macro-cell that TMobile was using to show off LTE.

Image


No, it's not. They're going to start selling a new LTE version of the S3. You're thinking of the Note 2.

----------

interesting article from BGR

http://bgr.com/2013/03/26/t-mobiles...+TheBoyGeniusReport+(BGR+|+Boy+Genius+Report)

The top of your phone indicates that you are on WiFi. A WiFi speedtest has nothing to do with what speeds you will get when you are not on WiFi.
Turn WiFi off and then run the same test.
 
The top of your phone indicates that you are on WiFi. A WiFi speedtest has nothing to do with what speeds you will get when you are not on WiFi.
Turn WiFi off and then run the same test.

I wish my wifi had those speeds. It's LTE. Look at the cell phone tower icon on the left. Wifi icon is different in the speed test app.

more proof

LTE ;)

20130326164854.png
 
I wish my wifi had those speeds. It's LTE. Look at the cell phone tower icon on the left. Wifi icon is different in the speed test app.

more proof

LTE ;)

Image

If you run the test with WiFi on you will be getting WiFi results. Turn off WiFi.
By the way. The top of your two images are different.
 
Can someone explain to me how T-Mobile will still make a profit out of all this?

The same way AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint make profits. The only difference--instead of having a 400% margin, T-Mobile will only have a 200% margin.
 
If you run the test with WiFi on you will be getting WiFi results. Turn off WiFi.
By the way. The top of your two images are different.

Notice the dates on the speed tests on the left column. The image on top (with CM10) was my older S3.

The last image I put up is my stock Touchwiz Note 2 that I have now.

Doesn't matter if WiFi is on for the last picture. Those tests were run on LTE and it tells you that with the cell tower icon. I'm connected to WiFi now

Just took a screen shot again. LOOK LTE ON TOP!
e5a2ymym.jpg
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.