that HD voice is the only thing that interests me
$70 is great for all this unlimited stuff - but you've forgot to tack on another $20 for the "phone loan".
$90 grand total. It's great marketing though to artificially make your pricing look so low so since all of NA is used to looking at the monthly with subsidies.
The current iPhone supports AWS LTE - which is where my confusion was as every article is talking about 3G AWS without specifically mentioning it.
I doubt it will affect resale that much as current iPhone 5 users can use both T-Mobile's and AT&T's LTE. You will just need the tweaked phone for t-mobile's places that haven't refarmed 3G to 1900.
The current iPhone 5 works on HSPA+21Mbps on the 1900MHz band with the network refarm and 1700MHz LTE. The iPhone 5 releasing on April 12th will work on all the above plus HSPA+42 Mbps on the 1700MHz band.
It will have a big impact on resale value.
this isn't any cheaper than anyone else for those who upgrade after every couple or whenever eligible. All they're doing is shifting around the #'s
$70 is great for all this unlimited stuff - but you've forgot to tack on another $20 for the "phone loan".
$90 grand total. It's great marketing though to artificially make your pricing look so low so since all of NA is used to looking at the monthly with subsidies.
this isn't any cheaper than anyone else for those who upgrade after every couple or whenever eligible. All they're doing is shifting around the #'s
$70 is great for all this unlimited stuff - but you've forgot to tack on another $20 for the "phone loan".
$90 grand total. It's great marketing though to artificially make your pricing look so low so since all of NA is used to looking at the monthly with subsidies.
cool, i don't imagine there will be tmobile lte in my area for quite some time, good news.
Does anyone know why Verizon's network speeds are slower than those of AT&T or T-Mobile???
I thought Verizon has always been considered the best.![]()
HD Voice sounds wonderful. More than anything else, I've always wanted smartphones to sound as good as a landline. Of course it requires a T-Mobile to T-Mobile call unfortunately.
WAY back in the day I worked for a cell phone company, we're talking the analog cell phone days. An analog cell phone with quality speaker/mics and good reception sounded every bit as good as the landline. Digital brought with it way too much compression and sound quality suffered.
Why would they bother? They are both constantly adding more customers every quarter whereas TMobile is losing people.
Let's not forget VZW/AT&T probably have more LTE out there than TMo has 3G right now. THeir coverage and customer service are medicare.
You truly get what you pay for.
T-Mobile has already announced (and reiterated today) that they'll have LTE across their whole network by the end of 2013.
guess I just have a good deal then....
I pay $140 a month for 2 iphone 5's - 450 shard minutes - both unlimited data and texts....
That equates to $70 a month (only bonus would be unlimited voice but don't need it).
That $70 also includes my subsidy, it wouldn't with t-mobile.
I do get an 18% employer discount on ATT, but still.....
You buy Verizon for reliability and coverage. AT&T for speed. T-Mobile or Sprint for value.
No, you're paying $99 up front and financing it (basically like a credit card, at a subsidized price) over the term, as long as it takes to pay off the phone. If you leave early, you owe TMobile the excess money.How do you think AT&T would be doing without the iPhone? Probably not as well. T-Mobile is just getting it so it will gain more customers with that plus the cheaper prices. Can you get a iP5 on AT&T for $99? No, you can't!
Why do you think AT&T wanted to buy T-Mobile?
Because they wanted their network.....which now is faster than AT&T's.
No, it's not. They're going to start selling a new LTE version of the S3. You're thinking of the Note 2.Here in Vegas, it should be online but i dont have a LTE phone. My GS3 is capable but probably have to get a update from TMo.
Just as you should always be especially wary of politicians who run for office by claiming that they arent politicians, so too should you be wary of profit-seeking companies who claim that theyre not only after your wallet. I mention this particular public relations technique because it happens to be the same strategy that T-Mobile is employing with its UNcarrier initiative, a clever attempt to rebrand the company as a consumer-friendly alternative to the twin evil empires of Verizon (VZ) and AT&T (T).
During an expletive-laden tirade on Tuesday, T-Mobile CEO John Legere tapped into consumer anger at Americas two largest wireless companies for pushing two-year contracts in exchange for subsidized smartphones, for slapping customers with overage fees for exceeding monthly data limits and for writing complex, hard-to-understand service agreements.
This is the biggest crock of s Ive ever heard in my entire life, he said at one point of the mobile industrys practices. Do you have any idea how much youre paying? Customers love smartphones, everyone hates contracts if you come to T-Mobile, youve signed your last contract.
All of this sounds nice LTE data overage fees truly are ridiculous, two-year service agreements are irritating and it would be nice to have simpler billing practices from wireless carriers. But how much better is the deal that T-Mobile is offering you over those of its rivals? The answer is, Better but not by as much as T-Mobile wants you to think.
Lets consider the payment plan that T-Mobile is offering users who want to pay low prices for new smartphones. The carrier lets users buy big-name smartphones such as the iPhone 5 and Galaxy S4 for $99 up front while then making $20 monthly payments for the next 24 months to pay off the rest of the cost of the device. So even if you decide to ditch T-Mobiles service after just one month on the network, youre still on the hook to pay the carrier $20 a month for the next two years unless you want to turn your device in.
This may not sound so bad, you say, because at least youll have the freedom to stop paying T-Mobile monthly service fees. This is certainly true, but you wont be taking your shiny new smartphone with you when you go because T-Mobile will not let you unlock it until youve fully paid off the cost of the device. So if you leave T-Mobile shortly after buying a phone, youre essentially stuck with a brick that you either have to pay off in full right away or return to T-Mobile before you can really move on to a new carrier.
So whats the advantage to signing onto a T-Mobile plan, then? Well, it is nice to pay less up front for your smartphone and to not be forced into paying T-Mobile for wireless service that youre unhappy with for two years. And while T-Mobile will throttle your data down to lower speeds on capped plans if you exceed your monthly LTE data limit, it wont gouge you with overage fees as AT&T and Verizon do. And T-Mobile has generally tried to make its data plans more affordable than its larger rivals plans, which should only continue if the company is successful in its attempts to buy MetroPCS (PCS).
The bottom line here is that while T-Mobiles plans are a welcome change from the status quo, consumers should keep their expectations in check for what they will and will not deliver. To use Legeres own colorful language, the worlds second-biggest crock of s can still be pretty big.
Image
AT&T in Boston
----------
No, you're paying $99 up front and financing it (basically like a credit card, at a subsidized price) over the term, as long as it takes to pay off the phone. If you leave early, you owe TMobile the excess money.
Might want to read up on that. AT&T was going to dismantle their network anyways. They wanted to buy T-Mobile for their spectrum, that's it. Take down their AWS 3G and put up AWS LTE to supplement their 700mhz network for congestion, etc (what VZW will start doing soon, in high traffic areas like NYC)
hardly. Your fast speeds are gone once you leave the city and you're stuck on BLAZING FAST EDGE, whereas AT&T/VZW have LTE.
T-Mobile can't touch these speeds and they're on a loaded network in Boston, not some tested macro-cell that TMobile was using to show off LTE.
Image
No, it's not. They're going to start selling a new LTE version of the S3. You're thinking of the Note 2.
----------
interesting article from BGR
http://bgr.com/2013/03/26/t-mobiles...+TheBoyGeniusReport+(BGR+|+Boy+Genius+Report)
The top of your phone indicates that you are on WiFi. A WiFi speedtest has nothing to do with what speeds you will get when you are not on WiFi.
Turn WiFi off and then run the same test.
I wish my wifi had those speeds. It's LTE. Look at the cell phone tower icon on the left. Wifi icon is different in the speed test app.
more proof
LTE
Image
Can someone explain to me how T-Mobile will still make a profit out of all this?
If you run the test with WiFi on you will be getting WiFi results. Turn off WiFi.
By the way. The top of your two images are different.