This is not true.
Spotify is advertising their "premium service " for 3 months for $0.99 .
https://www.spotify.com/us/
You can listen to Spotify for free but it is very limited,ad supported and low quality.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Taylor Swift Criticizes Apple Music's Free Trial in Open Letter
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
This is not true.
Spotify is advertising their "premium service " for 3 months for $0.99 .
https://www.spotify.com/us/
You can listen to Spotify for free but it is very limited,ad supported and low quality.
I thought forums was for expressing opinions. I stated that it was my personal take. I certainly didn't step on any others that liked her. And why single me out? There are others that have made similar statements. We do have freedom of speech.
You're missing the point. People here are upset because the artists are not being paid. All I'm saying is if you want the artists paid so badly then skip the free trial and start a paid subscription. Of course it doesn't make sense for somebody to ditch the trial. But if they want the artists paid then pay them themselves since they are the ones listening to the music.
They don't have to have their music in apples library. Pretty simple actually.
You don't get it. You can't use someone else's property (including intellectual property) for free. Investment went into creating that intellectual property (housing, food, instruments, studio time, hours of labor from musicians, producers, engineers, mixers, masterers).
Just because Hertz or Avis is not getting anything from me now doesn't mean I can use their rental car for free for 3 months. I certainly can't use Apple's Logic Pro or Final Cut Pro for 3 months free. The coders/programmers need to get paid for their creation. I can't use my neighbor's lawn mower for 3 months free. I can't live in a rental property for 3 months free.
Giving something away for free devalues that commodity. It's not the artists giving away a song for free as a loss leader to sell an album. It's a 3rd party giving away someone else's intellectual property away for free to help sell the 3rd party's business.
Last edited:
But many trial subscribers will not become paid subscribers (quite likely the vast majority will not). Why would you expect Apple to accept an unlimited liability like that?
Unbelievable how many are defending Apple ... defending the indefensible.
Well I don't work in the industry, but please tell from my post what I got so wrong about how music royalties work?
I don't think I'm missing the point. You are telling people to call apple to skip the free trial but what you are ignoring is that there are a ton of competing companies out there....so why would someone call Apple when they can just speak there opinion by giving a competing service there money? Also - Why would someone want to pay for a service whose policies they don't agree with?
You need top back off...NOW.
Well, if Britney is here: - then your opinion (WTF are you, after all?) is
---- down here.
Honestly, a bunch of internet NOBODIES criticizing someone else they think doesn't matter. It's actually pretty amusing.
But then I hear the Millennials ALL think they're all so self-important (Facebook and Twitter tries to make them think so as it makes them more money). Yes, see how important you are when you get that college degree, owe a ton of money and no one wants to hire you since all the jobs have gone to India, China and soon lots of other Asian countries. Yes, see how much it matters then that you have 200 friends on Facebook. Star of the world. Armchair quarterbacks one and all.
Maybe Apple should further limit there trial period the to something they and the artists can agree upon.
I don't know how many folks will cancel Spotify subscriptions, but I do believe folks using the free service will move over to the free Apple service because it will be done a bit better. Also I think folks will stop signing up for Spotify while they can get free Apple TV. This applies for ALL other streaming services. They will all have a decrease in their customer growth this summer if there is a free and excellent service available.
Also an App will recreate your spotify list in Apple Music by the end of July. At least that is my guess.
Nope - going from little income to no income is a little drop in earnings.
I'll will happily be convinced if you or anyone puts some actual figures into your argument.
If you are concerned with the welfare of struggling artists talk me through how much they might typically earn from free streaming services in three months, and what % of their total income from music that might be...
Yeah, I'm just guessing. But I do know that there are "starving" artists. I do know that is not made up. They struggle from week to week and they tend to work on the Indie labels which I strongly suspect do not have a few months of capital just sitting in the bank to tide them over. Small companies generally are finely balanced with cash coming in equalling cash going out pretty closely. If this Apple Music launch does what I think it will do which is drop the revenue of all the streaming services by 20% and iTunes sales by some solid percentage while not adding a balancing revenue anywhere, then the music industry is going to feel this. For the indie and the artists the revenue from these services is pure revenue with no cost associated. Any decrease in this goes straight to the bottom line. So if you business generates $100k per month but costs $90k to run, having the revenue decrease just a bit really gets you in trouble really quickly.
Did you even read the letter? She's made it clear this isn't about her music. She's fully aware she's financially set for life.
If it isn't generating any revenue, what value is it giving to Apple?
If your answer is that it adds value to the Apple Music service in the long run, then by the same token that must be adding value for the artists too.
Nobody is forcing the artists to submit their music to Apple Music. On the other hand if they want to have their music there they have to invest in it by not collecting three months worth of royalty revenue. It's just business. On the other hand, they are collecting higher revenue from Apple Music than from Spotify so I think the artists / labels are only trying to gather free press or are just plain greedy. Anyway, Spotify hasn't yet made any profit so the artists should just shut up since they are the ones making the money.
Yes, there are. But that's one expense of many - licensing is something all streaming musical services need to pay for, as well as hardware, software and people.
You can if you negotiate it as such, which is what the labels have done. Blame the labels if you don't like it. Also it's arguably not free, if there will be an ROI after 3 months.
So why don't the labels all get together and start their own streaming service where they take all of the money and then continue to give peanuts to the artists?
Probably because the costs don't just include hosting and content delivery...The music industry as a whole stands to gain in the long term if Apple Music becomes a huge success and sets new industry standards in revenue sharing and molding consumer behavior. They actually stand to gain a lot more than Apple does in this scenario. Looking at it from that perspective, and I'm sure the big labels have seen this, it almost makes sense that since the Music Industry has an even greater vested interest in seeing Apple Music succeed than Apple itself, that it "fronts" the incremental cost of the launch. I think that the individual artists and the smaller indie labels either haven't thought of this, or are being short sighted. I also don't think that the initial impact of revenue loss will be as high as they are anticipating/worrying about.
For real? I don't even listen to music but she has a very very good point. What if Amazon, Best Buy, and other resellers offered iPhones for free for 3 month trial and you can give it back without paying Apple a cent.
This is typical Apple bullying and defended by people who just want stuff for free.
The artists get compensated for the free model. They get a portion of the ad revenue.