Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think there should be a clear guideline by the labels. I'm not subscribed to any streaming service. But if so, I would like to have certainty when content is available or not in general.

Having artists to decide whether to release exclusive and early content or the other way round like Taylor Swift does in my opinion should be avoided.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fairuz
Why? Because...she’s dead!

NOW how will I NOT listen to Taylor Swift on my way to work?

#taylorswiftrumors
 
I guess I'll have to go down to my local Tower Records and buy the CD, have to pick up some batteries for my CD player too.
 
Who cares all new main stream music is garbage. Anything that is good from today I later find out the artist sung a cover song of a older song when music was music.
 
Indeed. The music industry made a huge mistake when they allowed the streaming services to stream individual songs on-demand/random-access for minuscule payouts. Streaming has long been waiting in the wings to replace radio, but the old tradeoff was, listen to a station/DJ and hope they play the song you want to hear (and get exposed to other songs along the way) or pay money to buy it and listen whenever you want. The microscopic payments would have worked for that, simply with streaming replacing airwaves as a delivery mechanism. But the music labels let the streaming services offer up unlimited-use random-access jukeboxes of all the music for one low price, and suddenly instead of radio play as an inducement to buy, we got streaming as an alternative to buying. And once you provide something so favorable to people like that they soon come to insist on it as a right, so it's going to be very hard to turn that boat around.

The music industry should look for ways to pull back a little, like holding albums as for-sale-only for a while before putting them up on streaming services. Imagine if all the Hollywood blockbusters were available on Netflix the same day they released in the theaters - people would like it, sure (and would soon insist that it had to be that way), but movie ticket sales would tank (which, in the long run, would lead to fewer big budget movies getting made).
IDK if it would help. They were under the threat of piracy and thought very hard about the choice. They also went through what must have been painful negotiations with every streaming service to determine those low prices. Not sure if the really famous artists themselves care anyway since they can make so much money from promotions and other stuff.

I personally like the idea of great music being something you buy and own a copy of. But it's not going to happen ever again.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: fluamsler
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.