It's a sidewalk. If I lived there and walked there everyday, I wouldn't look down to check where I was stepping. Even without texting, someone could very easily have fallen in.
I don't see how this is iPhone related.
I heard that local construction workers were arriving at work with their McDonalds coffee being cold so they asked McDonalds to make the coffee hotter so it was still warm when they arrived at work. When normal customers got their coffee, the temperature was above the normal range and received burns, so they sued and ended up winning.In the McDonald's case, the company knew their coffee was much hotter than normal, and had previously paid many times for injuries from it.
When a grandmother spilled hers and had to have skin grafts, she asked McDonald's to simply pay for the medical bills as they had usually done. McDonalds decided to refuse in her case. That ended up being a mistake, especially since they had a history of previous such payments.
My first instinct is to say that both parties are at fault with the workers owning the majority of the blame. But actually thinking about it, I don't believe the girl's at fault. Even if she wasn't texting, she could have been turning to speak with her friend or looking somewhere else. Nobody expects there to be a hole in the middle of the sidewalk
The city is indeed at fault but man. This has FAIL written all over it.
The city is indeed at fault but man. This has FAIL written all over it.
If this was caught on video (I'm probably going to get bashed), I would have laughed. EVEN if it was me I would've laughed.
What ever happened to survival of the fittest?
This happened over a year ago, just saying.
Sorry if I used the most recognizable example of this that I could think of to make my point. Whether it happened 15 years ago or 5 minutes ago, the point is still valid.
I heard that local construction workers were arriving at work with their McDonalds coffee being cold so they asked McDonalds to make the coffee hotter so it was still warm when they arrived at work. When normal customers got their coffee, the temperature was above the normal range and received burns, so they sued and ended up winning.
Like a big truck next to the sideway and guys walking around with traffic cones?People do tend to miss a lot what is below them if there isn't anything sticking up. Especially if they get distracted by looking at other stuff around them.
This. My 9 year old daughter would have fell in just walking with a friend if they were deep in conversationIt's a sidewalk. If I lived there and walked there everyday, I wouldn't look down to check where I was stepping. Even without texting, someone could very easily have fallen in.
Unfortunately, you are one of the many people bringing up this McDonald's case while completely ignoring the actual facts of the event. Like the fact that normal coffee dropped in your lap is bloody painful but doesn't cause third degree burns, like in this case. The fact that McDonald's knew that they served coffee that wasn't just hot, but dangerously too hot, and that before this case they had settled a total SEVEN HUNDRED other cases where customers were hurt by the extreme temperature of their coffee, so they KNEW that they were wrong and were serving coffee at temperaturs that caused extreme danger to their customers, and continued with that practice to save money.