Let's see what will happen.
This year's iPhone won't have 5G and neither USB-C IMHO this will slow down the sales ...
This year's iPhone won't have 5G and neither USB-C IMHO this will slow down the sales ...
Do people realize that 5G will require more towers, closer together? Everyone seems to gloss over the health & safety affects.
This article by Devra Davis of the Environmental Health Trust will give you a plethora of detailed and cited information on the negative health effects of 5G: https://medium.com/swlh/ten-corrections-to-william-j-78094d3c1aeeI agree. IF its anything like that installer video on page one of this thread it could lead to a plague on the world. Im not being light on this matter either. IT seems scary to think of the issues babies will have let alone the entire population if this is world wide.
Download speed doesn't = data usage.
A 20mb file is still only 20mb no matter how fast you can receive it.
Because that video, when downloaded over a faster connection, uses magnitudes more data? It really boggles my mind how people think that faster = more data for things with fixed sizes? It's JUST FASTER! SAME DATA!
If you drive a mile at 25mph and a mile at 75mph, did you go further when you drove at 75mph? Same distance, just did it faster.
I'm not worried about 5G radiation...there is so much radiation already in the air that if it's shortening my life, it's already happened by now.
Do people realize that 5G will require more towers, closer together? Everyone seems to gloss over the health & safety affects.
What do people need all that speed for?
That's just pure ignorance. "We do not need better performance!". Really? That's NFC 2.0 all over again. We do not need NFC! That is until Apple starts using it, then we are all aboard. I understand why some AAPL investors are trying to trivialize 5G until Apple manages to get one in their phones, but come on, don't take people here for fools.Meaningless. Network/download speeds aren't the limiting factor in how our devices work/perform. LTE is already very fast and has much better coverage than 5G will (for several years).
This is just another feature that will be overhypoed as necessary when it will make practically no difference to the consumer.
That's just pure ignorance. "We do not need better performance!". Really? That's NFC 2.0 all over again. We do not need NFC! That is until Apple starts using it, then we are all aboard. I understand why some AAPL investors are trying to trivialize 5G until Apple manages to get one in their phones, but come on, don't take people here for fools.
Not ignorance, simple fact. And what does NFC have to do with connection speeds over cellular? Oh right, nothing at all.
The ONLY real benefit of 5G for smartphone users (it has other benefits for industry that don’t matter to consumers) is the ability to handle more connections (like 50,000 people at a football game). However, venues like that are already implementing other solutions to solve that problem so it’s really a non-issue.
That's just pure ignorance. "We do not need better performance!". Really? That's NFC 2.0 all over again. We do not need NFC! That is until Apple starts using it, then we are all aboard. I understand why some AAPL investors are trying to trivialize 5G until Apple manages to get one in their phones, but come on, don't take people here for fools.
I remember being genuinely excited and impressed by 3G and 4G. They brought real quality of life improvements.
5G seems to be something that only the mobile operators are excited about.
4G gives me very fast speeds, good coverage, VoLTE, HD voice, WiFi Calling.
What does 5G give me? Super fast speeds in a tiny area that is affected by just about everything with potential health risks? No thanks.
Give us further 4G/LTE coverage, not mmwave 5G.
"And what does NFC have to do with connection speeds over cellular?" From a technical perspective - nothing. It has everything to do with the same psychology of a certain group of Apple fans/investors who are eager to deny the benefits of new tech when it is available on the devices from Apple competitors but not on Apple devices.
Also, since Apple is adding 5G in 2020, it looks like you are accusing Apple in trying to extract more money from their customers by adding unnecessary features. You'll probably have to switch to cheap Android phones without 5G to avoid being played by the "industry".
Maybe 4G/LTE with 5G backhaul is the right combination. Right now with 4G on my drive to the airport I lose service about for about 1/2 the drive even though the area is well inside the Verizon coverage map.
I think people questioning why this is necessary are only thinking about current usage and not future usage.
When you are streaming 8K 360 degree AR to your wireless contact lens, you are going to be happy that you are on a 6G network that was built on top of the 5G network.