Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The immigrants, universities, law firms, broadcasters and others who have sued have done so in direct response to actions he or his regime have taken against them. Considering that for the universities and law firms and broadcasters (and at least some of the immigrants) the regime’s actions have been attacks upon one or more constitutional and/or human rights, the comparison you’re making is a ridiculous one.
We’re seeing legal tools increasingly used as political weapons, not just to seek justice, but to neutralize opponents. When lawsuits are driven more by political motivations than clear-cut legal merit, it risks undermining faith in the legal system itself—regardless of who’s in power.
 
And also how tech savvy the parent is. Apple should at the very least make it easier and clearer for parents to setup/manage these controls. It takes quite a bit of fiddling and tech knowhow to get those in place.

And there should also be some type of profile management on shared ipads, to have a child profile, like macs have had forever.
While I fully Agree. Why would Apple do that when they can force you to have multiple devices in the house instead of just one?

Like everything , it's BUSINESS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rmadsen3
How are children getting unrestricted access to a smartphone where they can download whatever apps they want?

Apparently people want to foist the responsibility of parenting onto the government and private companies.

If YOU decide to have children, it is YOUR responsibility to parent them appropriately. There are literally FREE parental controls built in to iOS that would literally do what this law does, without imposing on every other adult.

Why do we need government-mandated age verification for app stores, but kids can turn on the television and see all manner of sex and violence unrestricted by any law. Make it make sense.
You are underestimating how many crummy parents there are out there or ones that have very little clue how tech works. Most peoples phones are just little glowing dopamine boxes used primarily for texting and social media. A digital slot machine. And they just deal them out like crack to their kids having no idea what it's going to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noanker
Because it works. Trump plays the media and people like a fiddle and no one seems to have caught on. No one is forcing you or anyone else to get "riled up".
My post was in response to someone else suggesting that “getting people riled up” was a page from the left’s playbook. I’m not on the left, but you don’t have to be to see that that suggestion was absurd, because both sides do it. Trump’s lovely and heartwarming Memorial Day greeting demonstrates that.
 
I don't know all the implications that come with this bill, but I don't see an issue. The internet is a crazy place and parents should be responsible to govern what their kids see and have access to which I think applies to applications, especially apps that are using social media. Of course kids will find a way around or they will have parents who just don't care and either give the password or just install whatever they want. I play GTA V online every now and then on PC and it is crazy when you hear these little kids talking away on voice with adults. The language alone that comes out and toxicity from players is crazy and then going into he game itself with strip club and prostitutes, it is certainly not age appropriate for children, but parents like the easy babysitter despite it being bad for the kids.
 
Texas politics are pretty horrible at this time. A few years back the state GOP passed a resolution renouncing the 2020 election results, thereby formally declaring that they were seditious. The weather sucks too. But normal/non-political people you meet everyday are very friendly.
Texas is a great state that unfortunately hasn’t been well served by its state government in quite some time. I’m not an expert on this measure so I’m open to being corrected, but it *seems* like overreach since Apple has already implemented robust parental controls. Apple’s method lets parents restrict any or all apps on their children’s’ devices via a method designed to avoid privacy concerns. The Texas measure would *seem* to force Apple to rework their method for no clear benefit, and in a manner less conducive to protecting privacy.
 
Considering what tech is doing to most kid's well being along with tech-ignorant parents.....consider this a digital seat belt.
what tech is doing to most kid's well being is called unfettered capitalism, which Republicans are also to blame for with their deregulation. But ironically they only want deregulation as long as they can make money off these kids
 
All that object to this will simply set the device up as over 18 and control anything unwanted with parental controls. I have two kids and am a mobile engineer myself... they know so many ways to get around any restriction. This is just smoke and mirrors for votes and to please non-tech savvy
 
  • Like
Reactions: Morod
Texas likes doing that, they like telling people who or what they are, if they are or not a woman, and now if kids can or cannot use the Apple Store. Meh.

Best solution to fix this is to move out of Texas. Problem solved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Morod
My God. How are Americans so heartless to allow this nonsense? Why are people so cruel. Fight the real enemy... the tax code that allows billionaires to hoard wealth instead of taxing them properly. Don't starve Kids.

I was explaining taxes to my 11 yo. She was like "why don't they just tax everyone the same?"
Crazy concept. Even an 11-yo gets it.

So freaking dumb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Morod
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.