I would like to know, how many decent ones there are. some of those that do not say, he shouldn't be sentenced, because he is God and so on, will say he just saved the money from misspending by the state, I imagine.
3,5years seems not much considering the huge amount of money, but then one could say, that for a conservative person 3,5 years will feel very long and stay forever in his mind (not making him to want to try, if he gets away the next time), so it might do its purpose.
Though I find there is something questionable about how they decided. They just said that the self-accusation was not valid, because to many documents were missing and only passed on a year later with the beginning of the trial. They did not say anything about the amount of money that was taken into account. I mean what part of the 27,2Million were seen as basis of the judgement and what part was taken as being time-barred (if that is the right word for something that is to far in the past, so you can't be accused for it). Also the prosecutor said on Tuesday, that she is doing him good and had roughly estimated in his favour and that there would be more, if they had an extensive look.
They today just said "gulity in seven cases".
I wonder, if it was more like a deal. "OK, we take the 27,2Mio and we do not have to do the work and look extensively into your documents, and you will get less years. Both happy".
Though Hoeneß avocate has declared they will go into revision.
PS: the "Kulturzeit"-magazine titled: "Der Runde muss ins Eckige" (which is a play with the German saying, "Das Runde muss ins Eckige". Meaning "the round (ball) must be in the square (box). The other would read "the (person with the) round (shape) must be in the square (room)".

(Also in German you say "der Runde" about a fat person, in a kind colloquial way.) They closed it with "not in every case extra time makes a good match"