I told you so. You have never been into sports yourself, have you? No sportsmanship.Well I guess it’s time me to say told you so. England dominated this game, and where the better team for sure.
So low.
I told you so. You have never been into sports yourself, have you? No sportsmanship.Well I guess it’s time me to say told you so. England dominated this game, and where the better team for sure.
Having said that, I would have welcomed Senegal and Japan doing better than they did; both teams graced the tournament, unlike the south Americans.
I told you so. You have never been into sports yourself, have you? So low.
Me a fan. Haha. You are the one that is absolutely blind.What? You and others wanted to argue with me, but I saw this coming. Sweden was clearly not up to the level of England. That packing in the back line could only get them so far. It’s clear I know more about the game of football then you, or your just a blind fan.
I remember it well! The tears. That look from Gary Linker, and above all the hurt!No, Sweden's limitations have been exposed, and Pickford (in case anyone was in doubt after the penalty shoot out against Colombia) proved that he is an excellent keeper at this level.
But, above all, Gareth Southgate is vindicated; he is now the most successful English manager since Bobby Robson - having qualified for the World Cup semi-final for the first time since Bobby Robson managed the same feat as manager of England in 1990.
No sportsmanship.
So low.
Disappointment is totally ok. Tears and anger is ok when we lose. Sportsmen/women show emotions. We get crashed.One time I lost a close match and kicked the living hell out of a trash can in the locker room.![]()
Just don't see why it's a big upset (Belgium is no underdog nor was Brazil a huuge favorite). And also disagree. Belgium played great - no discussion. Great players and a great team effort no question. But Brazil had tons of chances to score. Way more and way better chances than Belgium while the initial own goal played right into the counterattacking plans of Belgium (a plan I acknowledge but also get quite annoyed of nowadays - not the failure of Belgium of course but still) and Brazil could have gotten easily a penalty (Jesus) - so I just don't see where Belgium was that much better. They parked the bus and have world class counter attackers - that's basically it.
Sooo boooring match.
This is why I more often watch the ladies, then the guys.
But not so often these days either, actually.
England deserved it.
Thought Sweden could do a better tactical game. This was crap.
The first half hour was turgid, indeed. Tedious to watch. England content to play tiki-taka rather than run at the Swedish defence, which actually would probably have resulted in more goals as the Swedish defence seemed to crumble when played against at speed. Unfortunately, Sterling, while nimble, is another Wellbeck who flatters to deceive. He can run at defences and get in front of goal. However, once there he runs out of ideas and tends to just give the ball away. He lacks the killer touch. England also started to show the worrying tendency of old to give the ball away when not under pressure. Some very sloppy passes.
The English defence didn't seem that solid today. To many gaps opening that a better opponent would have exploited. Very disappointed in Sweden. Just no real ideas coming out from them apart from hoping to profit from a counter attack. Neither team showed its best today.
Why can't I help smiling that whoever we play in the semis played later than us and for longer. Hope it helps!
Unfortunately, whomever will win that semi between England vs Russia / Croatia, have 1 day less resting then Belgium / France, to the final. So that kind of thinking will bite your a*** later.Why can't I help smiling that whoever we play in the semis played later than us and for longer. Hope it helps!