Almost worse, than the player being unsettled, from a vendor club perspective, is having the player run down their contract and thus leaving the club as a free agent, which would leave the vendor club completely out of pocket.No clubs have any issues raiding less wealthy clubs for their best talent. NUFC has no compunction about it either; they do it as much as anyone else. It’s business, and that’s what football is. Liverpool didn’t make a stink in the press about it, all the noise was on Newcastle’s side. The part that stings for Newcastle is that despite their Middle Eastern wealth they’re still getting poached. I’m not convinced the Isak deal is the best idea (the mind boggles at the sums involved), but he is a good forward, proven in this league. Geuhi is a much more pragmatic move; there is a shortage in defense when considering league, cup, and European commitments plus Konate’s situation and Gomez’s injury history.
Clubs on the receiving end of these bids are in a difficult situation. If they hold the line and refuse to sell the player may be unsettled. If they try to hold the line and fail, they may find themselves in the last week of the transfer window trying to buy a replacement for a key starter when everyone knows they have money and are desperate. And such players don’t grow on trees.
In such circumstances, it may be deemed more prudent to sell the player when a demand for his services arises - along with an offer of an appropriate fee for the player - rather than waiting, and running the risk of earning nothing as a consequence.