And - for this fleeting moment, at least - Arsenal are now top of the table this evening, though, with Liverpool travelling to Chelsea to play them later on, the gods alone know how long this may last.
A good victory for United, as Sunderland are no longer the clowns of old, but, instead, are a well put together, and intelligently recruited, and seriously focussed team.United actually turned up today against an in-form Sunderland, who is nonetheless still a newly-promoted team. Good debut for Senne Lammens in goal — surely having a non-liability between the posts will help. A tougher test to follow at Anfield next.
All of what you say is true, but I would go further; Liverpool miss TAA, who was a steady and reliable source of ball supply (in the form of elegant, excellent, exceptionally precise passes) to Salah, who looks a lot less lethal in his absence.Thats 3 defeats in a row for Liverpool against a weakened Chelsea side (although Liverpool also have their own injuries).
2 of the 3 defeats happening in injury time.
Perhaps 'Pool are missing a Wijnaldum and Henderson to protect the back four. Slot brought on Endo but didn't matter
Kerkez has been a mixed bag. And arguably not an uprade on Robertson so far.
I'd also argue Isak hasn't moved the needle for 'Pool. Although its very early days and he technically assisted for the Gakpo goal. But to me Ekitike has actually hit the ground running and made a difference.
Indeed.Top of the table for next few weeks.![]()
This is probably as good a time as any to go to Anfield, not that I'm getting my hopes up.
Liverpool losing 3 games on the trot. A game against their ole enemy United, will that give them the gusto to go for a win and get a 9-0 score line in their favor? lol
It sounds like the EFL are imposing punishments again, which hurt the club more than the owners.The MASSIVE haven't been paid in over a month... someone want to double check me on that?
I don't get it
I’m only guessing, but presumably an Ireland fan who also happens to be a Liverpool supporter.I don't get it
Portugal faced Ireland on Saturday. (Sporting's stadium).I don't get it
So she was paying tribute?I’m only guessing, but presumably an Ireland fan who also happens to be a Liverpool supporter.
If you notice she is holding a Portuguese jersey.So she was paying tribute?
If that is correct then it is so wrong in my opinion. Age does not factor into my opinion and that is no one should be holding the shirt of a rival international team at a football match, not even if it's a tribute. Yes by all means hold the players club shirt but not their international one when at an international game.If you notice she is holding a Portuguese jersey.
Near the numbers there is the symbol of the Portuguese Federation (which is a Cross of Christ from the Order of Christ which itself was formed by exiled Templar Knights). It's even the new 2025 Puma model.
Let's agree to differ.If that is correct then it is so wrong in my opinion. Age does not factor into my opinion and that is no one should be holding the shirt of a rival international team at a football match, not even if it's a tribute. Yes by all means hold the players club shirt but not their international one when at an international game.
Is my opinion controversial, in today's society yes it is but I am of the opinion there are limits to what people should and should not do.
I'm not that strict.If that is correct then it is so wrong in my opinion. Age does not factor into my opinion and that is no one should be holding the shirt of a rival international team at a football match, not even if it's a tribute. Yes by all means hold the players club shirt but not their international one when at an international game.
Is my opinion controversial, in today's society yes it is but I am of the opinion there are limits to what people should and should not do.