Here's what you wrote:
I found you exactly that - an article that does not use any of the words you placed in quotes. Mind you, the article also has a lot of good things to say about the Air, but evidently you can't look past any of the criticisms.
Also, "limit" is not exactly the "equivalence" (I think you meant "equivalent") of "compromise". A limit implies a boundary, while a compromise implies a midway point. But we don't need to get into semantics.![]()
You're arguing the semantics.
The article is not negative, but it is not positive either. "Can't look past any of the criticisms" is a copout for the fact that the article's conclusion is "I still don't think most people should buy it", clearly illustrating what the author felt despite the fact they tried to remain "fair". This is even mentioned up front.