I'm not bashing the Apple Watch, I think the design is good and I intend to buy one. But I was in Target today and I couldn't help but notice the similarities between it and a vtech smartwatch.

I'm not bashing the Apple Watch, I think the design is good and I intend to buy one. But I was in Target today and I couldn't help but notice the similarities between it and a vtech smartwatch.
Image
I'm not bashing the Apple Watch, I think the design is good and I intend to buy one. But I was in Target today and I couldn't help but notice the similarities between it and a vtech smartwatch.
Image
If you think this $35K watch is better looking than the Apple Watch, then we apparently have very different tastes. You couldn't pay me to wear this thing:
Image
Jean-Claude Biver is an important person in the watch industry.
He's been with AP and Blancpain in the past and currently heads Hublot and LVMH's luxury watch division.
LVMH owns brands like Dior, Celine, Givenchy, Fendi, Louis Vuitton, De Beers, Hublot, TAG Heuer, Zenith, DFS, Sephora, Guerlain, Dom Perignon, etc.
http://www.businessinsider.com/jean-claude-biver-apple-watch-2014-9
What do you guys think of his comment?
If you think this $35K watch is better looking than the Apple Watch, then we apparently have very different tastes. You couldn't pay me to wear this thing:
Image
I'd say he needs to shut his mouth before I punch him in his damn face!
There is very little overlap between the Apple Watch price range and the price range that LVMH brands occupy (Tag Heuer which sells watches upward of $2000 to Hublot which sells watches higher than $8000) so I wouldn't just dismiss it as an invective coming from a "competitor."
People who buy Hublots, Audemars Piguet, Richard Mille, Patek Philippe, etc may buy Apple Watches but they won't stop buying the former because of the Apple Watch.
You are mistaken. The low end Apple Watch is $350, but that is far from the "range" that you think it will stay in.
The Apple Watch Edition (the 18k gold encased one) will be $5k at MINIMUM. The raw materials for it alone cost around 3-4k. I am not joking I'm 100% serious. Look up the cost of 18k solid gold and then look up the specs of the Apple Watch encasing and weight. It will probably come with a leather strap as standard. If you want a gold strap alone will be another couple of thousand dollars. This means that an Apple Watch can be anywhere in the range of $350 to $10k depending on how you configure it.
Apple is absolutely competing in the high end of the market. Apple did not make a smartwatch. Apple made a watch. Notice that no where in their market do they mention "smartwatch".
As someone posted in another thread, the back of the watch clearly states 18-karat gold. Jony Ive said it was 18-karat gold in the Watch video. Apple executives told John Gruber it was NOT gold plated. It would be pretty stupid and highly irresponsible for them to lie about something like that.I'm not so sure it will be 18k "solid" gold. It will be plated. Their assertions that "our metallurgists developed to be up to twice as hard as standard gold", is frankly, a joke. The way you make Gold stronger is to mix it with alloys, or to plate an alloy in it. That way you get the "Gold" look, while maintaining strength. Gold is natural, there's no magical alchemy you can use to make solid gold any stronger than what it actually is. It's not a man made substance.
I think it's kind of funny that with so little information on a device, people have all but settled on its pricing (something not even Apple know) and have already settled on all it's specifications.
I'd be utterly surprised if the "gold" watch isn't retailed for around $799 or less.
As someone posted in another thread, the back of the watch clearly states 18-karat gold. Jony Ive said it was 18-karat gold in the Watch video. Apple executives told John Gruber it was NOT gold plated. It would be pretty stupid and highly irresponsible for them to lie about something like that.
I've noticed a trend lately. We are now at the point where people assume the worst even when apple directly states something to the contrary.
Apple: it's not gold plated
Forum: it must be plated
apple: we can't extract data from your phone for the cops because we don't have the keys
Forum: Apple has the keys and is secretly giving data to the NSA
"The next chapter for us is about personal devices, about something thats even more personal than what we had before. And I think the watch is a great place to start that. And it has a lot of tentacles."
I don't love the way the Apple Watch looks, but I think the key for this first model is software . If the software gets set the way it is, the hardware can be updated as the components get smaller.
I think Jean-Claude Biver knows that his luxury watch division has perhaps 3-5 years left before it is dramatically downscaled.
I'm not bashing the Apple Watch, I think the design is good and I intend to buy one. But I was in Target today and I couldn't help but notice the similarities between it and a vtech smartwatch.
Image
I don't see this as the same market at all; a classic and expensive timepiece that will keep its appeal and value for many many years is a whole other thing than a smart watch which is largely obsolete (compared to newer models) in 2 years.
Jony should have brought back the pocket watch.
The analogy fails because hublot (> 8000 dollars) doesn't compete with the Apple watch (>$350)
The solid gold Apple watch won't be 350
Solid gold Hublots are above 20k.
Lowest priced mens hublots are around 10k new.
It's a different market.