Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

JayLenochiniMac

macrumors G5
Original poster
Nov 7, 2007
12,819
2,390
New Sanfrakota
The biggest collective ****-fit in the history of Apple-versus-the-standard-tech-industry ****-fits has officially begun.

Sport
38mm $349
42mm $399

Stainless Steel
38mm $549-1049
42mm $599-1099

Edition
From $10,000

Discuss.
 
With the exception of the edition model (which I am not the market for) I was pretty close on my guess. Although I am surprised that there was no mention of separately sold bands.
 
so i take it the sport won't have sapphire crystal. must only be on the steel models. of course, they didn't bother mentioning the one thing i was interested in knowing.
 
$549 is outright outrageous!!!! I don't care who you are. That's over $200 more than the Gear S that doesn't even need a phone to work. Doesn't even have a keyboard..NO!!!!!
 
SS model is $50 more then I guessed. I don't even remember what I guessed for the Edition but I really didn't care about it. I was spot on with the Sport and that is most likely the model I will get.
 
The stainless steel models are priced pretty much what I expected. The starting price of the Edition models are a little bit higher than I thought it'd be, but I'm not at all surprised.

Gruber is going to claim victory, even though he was totally off on the SS models.
 
I guess the question I would have is why I am paying $200 more for steel and sapphire? Those don't really add much to the cost of the device. Forget paying $9700 more for gold.
 
I can live with $200 more for SS and Sapphire. Hate the timing though. It cuts too close to a 3 week vacation I will be on so I may have to wait unless I get quickly into the queue A MONTH FROM NOW. ACKKKKKKKK
 
so i take it the sport won't have sapphire crystal. must only be on the steel models. of course, they didn't bother mentioning the one thing i was interested in knowing.

We've known for a fact since September that the Sport watches will only have an ion-infused glass—this has been on Apple's website.
 
I was fully expecting the Apple Watch (stainless steel) to start somewhere between $750 and $1000, so I'm actually pretty okay with it.

I'm never going to get an Edition anyway, so I don't care if the pricing is outrageously in line with traditional watch prices. Apple's aiming high with that, but it doesn't affect my life one bit.
 
Apple watch was cheaper then I expected, and I thought they would eat the size tax. Must overall, I'm pretty happy.

Two Apple watches for us and as many editions as I can get to resell. #
 
so i take it the sport won't have sapphire crystal. must only be on the steel models. of course, they didn't bother mentioning the one thing i was interested in knowing.

We have known that since September...

Sport has aluminum and glass, watch has steel and sapphire.
 
so i take it the sport won't have sapphire crystal. must only be on the steel models. of course, they didn't bother mentioning the one thing i was interested in knowing.

Has this not been on Apple.com for months? Ion-X Glass for the Sport.
 
I was fully expecting the Apple Watch (stainless steel) to start somewhere between $750 and $1000, so I'm actually pretty okay with it.

I'm never going to get an Edition anyway, so I don't care if the pricing is outrageously in line with traditional watch prices. Apple's aiming high with that, but it doesn't affect my life one bit.

I am betting you are actually more correct than you realize right now. That $549/$599 is not going to include the band most want. Most will want the combos that will price it in the $700-$1099 range.
 
SS is right where I expected for the base model, I'm a little surprised at the $1099 for (presumably) the Black/Steel Link SS model - I would have expected/hoped them to come in solidly under the $1K mark for that one.

That pushes it right on 3x the Sport model, and just short of 2x the base SS model's price - too much upgrade for bracelet+black for me, as much as I love DLC-coating.

Going to be a VERY tough call on the Sport vs. Base SS for me, though I'll probably cave in and get the SS in the end.
 
i can't for the life of me figure out what the 4 ****'s stand for in the title?

:confused:

(i'm being completely serious here.....)
 
i can't for the life of me figure out what the 4 ****'s stand for in the title?

:confused:

(i'm being completely serious here.....)

It starts with s and ends with t.

From Gruber:

"When the prices of the steel and (especially) gold Apple Watches are announced, I expect the tech press to have the biggest collective ****-fit in the history of Apple-versus-the-standard-tech-industry ****-fits. The utilitarian mindset that asks “Why would anyone waste money on a gold watch?” isn’t going to be able to come to grips with what Apple is doing here. They’re going to say that Jony Ive and Tim Cook have lost their minds. They’re going to wear out their keyboards typing “This never would have happened if Steve Jobs were alive.” They’re going to predict utter and humiliating failure. In short, they’re going to mistake Apple for Vertu."
 
I am betting you are actually more correct than you realize right now. That $549/$599 is not going to include the band most want. Most will want the combos that will price it in the $700-$1099 range.
No: I expected a starting price that high, with the bands costing significantly more. Gruber made mention that the link bracelet could push a $1000 Watch to a $2000 purchase. If the Watch with a Link Bracelet is just over a grand, that's actually a good thing.
 
i hope it flops to give apple a reality check. i wonder what their goal in sales is. i cant see many < 25 year olds getting one considering how much the iPhone already costs, add the first Watch that looks fairly decent and you are looking at something like $1.500
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.