Battery life will be same or less by 1-2 hours at most. Even if you didn't get your MBA at this time the (eventually) old model (the one you have) will still be available or purchase for a while.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The Argument for an 11.88-Inch Retina MacBook Air
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Battery life will be same or less by 1-2 hours at most. Even if you didn't get your MBA at this time the (eventually) old model (the one you have) will still be available or purchase for a while.
Agreed that the 11" feels small, but the 13" MBA is 1440x900, the same screen real estate as the standard res 15" MBP so it's not really "losing" two inches of room for tool palettes, they just appear a little smaller on the screen.
Actually the battery life on the new 13 rMBP is fantastic which is why I got it instead of the vastly more powerful 15 variant. The battery life even using fcpx is surprisingly good unless it is performing analysis....
It'll definitely depend on the price they can offer an rMBA at, but if it starts around $999, then that'd be my guess too.
I'd like a smaller bezel and an edge-to-edge keyboard please.
In a 11" form factor, but with that 12" screen.
You used to make it, you called it the 12" PowerBook.
Can I just get an Intel version of that please?
In a 11" form factor, but with that 12" screen.
You used to make it, you called it the 12" PowerBook.
Can I just get an Intel version of that please?
Not quite. Remember the 12" PB used a 4:3 aspect ratio display. This could very well mean the 11" MBA's footprint is already wider than the 12" PB's footprint which is why they don't need to make an edge-to-edge keyboard.
Is the MBA keyboard more compressed than their other keyboards? If it is I'd like to see enlarged but going edge-to-edge for its own sake is not something we should be requesting.
Two thoughts:
#1 the importance of keeping the same DPI is more important from a hardware software perspective than a user perspective. I agree the returns greatly diminish after 200dpi on a keyboard/clamshell design.
#2 I don't believe this system WILL replace the MBA (in the short term) because I believe it will be the first Mac OS based system to use an ARM chipset. I think this because the greater performance per watt of ARM will be necessary to drive the higher resolution and still maintain a comparable experience while keeping power draw to a minimum. Likewise with their own chip and in-house ARM-motherboard experience I think Apple can create much more efficient chipsets and keep battery life comparable.
The first fan-less Apple laptop? Maybe. Certainly stronger, thinner, lighter.
#1 the importance of keeping the same DPI is more important from a hardware software perspective than a user perspective. I agree the returns greatly diminish after 200dpi on a keyboard/clamshell design.
#2 I don't believe this system WILL replace the MBA (in the short term) because I believe it will be the first Mac OS based system to use an ARM chipset. I think this because the greater performance per watt of ARM will be necessary to drive the higher resolution and still maintain a comparable experience while keeping power draw to a minimum. Likewise with their own chip and in-house ARM-motherboard experience I think Apple can create much more efficient chipsets and keep battery life comparable.
The first fan-less Apple laptop? Maybe. Certainly stronger, thinner, lighter.
i don't see how anyone could see this as illogical. Having 2 screen size options that are both too small for any serious work has always made no sense to me. Might as well split the difference, while keeping the price low to satisfy the only real reason why people buy a MacBook air - price and small size. I can imagine the majority of people only differentiate the size of the current Air based on price, given that there is such a small difference in screen sizes on an already small machine. By splitting the difference, you have one less configuration to manufacture and you don't really alienate the majority of potential Air customers, given that it is not a machine built for performance or physical screen real estate anyway. Then you are still left with the differentiation between Airs and Pros being the processing power and graphics, just as it was back in the original MacBook vs Macbook Pro days. You don't always have to use "retina" as a designation of product class, and it seems obvious that Apple is eventually trying to get to this point with their entire line (excluding the iMacs, which likely will maintain their resolution for a few more years until 4K becomes more reasonably priced and GPU technology catches up).
Not necessarily.
13" MBP Retina = 2560x1600
15" MBP Retina = 2880x1800
Effective screen space equiavlent is: (because UI doesn't get smaller on retina)
1280x800
1440x900
If you just cut those down for an 11" MacBook Air, you get effective space of:
1083x676
1055x659
Not much real estate (though sharp).
arn
Last edited:
Ever heard of manufacturing?
They could literally use THE SAME display panels as the iPad Air, but just a little larger. They just cut the sheets differently........and if you'd actually read the article you would understand this.
I very much doubt Apple has any interest in designing their own laptop chips when Intel is clearly doing just fine in that area for them. I can imagine having to support 2 different chip technologies in OSX is a burden, based on the interim when they went from PowerPC to Intel around 2006. And based on what it sounds like Intel's main focus is currently, I'd say they've already got plenty of ultra low power mobile computing chips in the pipeline.
the problem with this rumor is that apple most likely will not have both an ipad pro at 12" and a macbook air at 12". These are the same devices, which leads me to believe apple is releasing their first tablet with a keyboard dock.
perhaps it runs both osx and ios?
perhaps it runs both osx and ios?
Apple will call the current MBA models simply MacBooks.
This new retina-12 inch MBA will be the "New MacBook Air"
Line-up 2014:
15.4-inch MacBook Pro w/Retina Display
13.3-inch MacBook Pro w/Retina Display
13.3-inch MacBook
11.6-inch MacBook
11.88-inch MacBook Air w/Retina Display
This new retina-12 inch MBA will be the "New MacBook Air"
Line-up 2014:
15.4-inch MacBook Pro w/Retina Display
13.3-inch MacBook Pro w/Retina Display
13.3-inch MacBook
11.6-inch MacBook
11.88-inch MacBook Air w/Retina Display
I agree that the iPad's 264 PPI being right between the 260 to 270 PPI of what doubling of the current MBA resolutions would probably be more ideal for usability, but from the standpoint of economics of scale I'd think being able to use more of their MBP sheets would save them more money.
Those devices run iOS. There are more applications on OS X that take advantage of a higher resolution display...
oh, this is why I'm about to buy a little and efficient mba 11" sometime in the coming months. I got no need for fancy retina stuff as this will be my little mini music production center when out and about and very few audio-related software has gone retina (not even) yet...
Replacing it with an 11" iPad would be silly. An iPad with an ARM processor can't replace an x86 MBA.
