I would like to see better battery life as well, but that doesn't seem to be a priority with the AW/AWU at this time. I really hope I'm proven wrong with the next update. As long as the AW is an extension of the iPhone, battery life will be an issue. A Garmin is not trying to be an extension of the phone, but rather a connected sports watch. So, at least with the current state of battery chemistry, what features would one be willing to give up on the AW in order to have longer battery life?My main jealousy of the Garmin is still battery life - Hopefully that can be a bit better with the Ultra 3 coming up. Two full years in the oven should make it a pretty good upgrade?
But just as you mention here, I have a wife that likes to know I'm okay when going on the long runs in the weekend in the early morning, so being able to go without my phone is just a killer feature
I have an AWU 1 and the battery is at 86%, which means I charge it every other day. I don't think that's too bad going on three years. I also have a Garmin Epix which is AMMOLED and I use it with the display always on. I get six days of battery life. But again, the Epix isn't trying to do as much as the AW, so it's using less power to do so. That seems to be the trade off.
On the Garmin side, many users seem to be requesting LTE connectivity on the watches, which will more than likely impact battery life, especially when using GPS. We'll see how that plays out.
Right now, it's best to pick whichever watch checks the most boxes for your personal needs. Until there is a perfect watch, we are going to have to make some compromises in whichever platform we choose. There's really no right or wrong answer, IMO, just personal choice.