This has to be the most worthless post I've read on MacRumors since, well...since Jordan's post prior to this I guess. Utter tosh!
better question is did anyone else notice it. I know a lot of people tend to turn it off the TV shortly after the game is over.
This has to be the most worthless post I've read on MacRumors since, well...since Jordan's post prior to this I guess. Utter tosh!
Some makes sports a life-or-death thing. While to you it is a mindless waste of time and effort, to others it is what they live for.
Sorry to burst your bubble Mac fans, but and advertisement that only targets existing customers is not exactly the best advertisement ever.
How many people who have never used an iPhone would have even known it was an iPhone they were all using.
We may call it the cheapest advertisement, but it is far far far from the best.
He speaks the truth, yet you down-vote him in a landslide?
We here on MacRumors are NOT the average consumer. We can spot the difference between an iPhone and an HTC from 30 yards away... The average consumer just sees people snapping photos and videos with a smart-phone.
He speaks the truth, yet you down-vote him in a landslide?
We here on MacRumors are NOT the average consumer. We can spot the difference between an iPhone and an HTC from 30 yards away... The average consumer just sees people snapping photos and videos with a smart-phone.
I didn't say that the sporting event was worthless, my point was that the inferences made in this article are just stupid. The fact that a bunch of Athletes took some photos using an iPhone does not make it news. This is of course made worse by it then being regurgitated here for all to endure once again. The standard of news has gone downhill so fast here at MacRumors that they might as well jack it in and go and work for Fox.
I might be wrong but I think the average consumer assumes that a random smart-phone is an iPhone.
Right...unless you were a Giants FAN, nobody watched the post-game stuff. Much less even notice the players taking pictures...much less wonder if it was an iPhone or Droid or other device.
Watching this video and looking for the cameras, there really is no definitive proof that they are all iPhones. I think I spotted 1.
I was, however, immediately creeped out regarding the guy in the tan jacket smiling while everyone was fondling the trophy.
Expecting MacRumors to not downvote vague anti-Mac snark is like expecting a shark NOT to take a bite out of a wounded swimmer. Remember we Mac fans have been very touchy about criticisms for a long time, old habits are hard to break. (posted by an almost exclusivly Apple hardware customer)
I might be wrong but I think the average consumer assumes that a random smart-phone is an iPhone.
[url=http://cdn.macrumors.com/im/macrumorsthreadlogodarkd.png]Image[/url]
More than fifty commercials aired during the Super Bowl this past Sunday, including one from Samsung that again poked fun at Apple's customers.
Apple didn't run any ads during the Super Bowl, at least not officially -- a fact that puzzled some commentators. But, as investment guru Jim Cramer points out, Apple did have an advertisement of sorts air during the Super Bowl.
After the game was over, Colts hall of gamer Raymond Berry carrier the Vince Lombardi Trophy along a long line of New York Giants players. Players took turns touching or kissing the trophy, all the while taking photos and videos of the event. By far the most common device used to record the moment was the iPhone -- an event seen by millions.
YouTube: videoJim Cramer:A 30-second spot during the game cost advertisers $3.5 million. For 1 minute and 20 seconds, Giants players used their iPhones to capture a once-in-a-lifetime moment that tens of millions watched on television. Cramer believes that this, more than any anything else, was the best advertisement of the Super Bowl.
via Daring Fireball
Article Link: The Best Superbowl Ad Was for the iPhone
They're selling like crazy for any phone other than the iPhone I guess. Last I checked it was reported that Samsung had sold 1 million Galaxy Notes globally in 2 months. Apple last noted they sold 37 million in a quarter or 3 months. Who knows maybe they will sell 36 million in the US in the first month.
I'm not arguing that there isn't a market for it. Which is probably why Samsung has 134 phones to sell vs Apples 3.
I moved from a stylus phone, had 2 Palm Treo's, and I still can't remember how many stylus I had to buy between my kids and myself.
Note: I'm not trying to compare the Treo to the Note. ATM I just can not think of a reason I would need to pull a stylus out.
On another note I enjoyed the America's Got Talent commercial.
jack it in and go and work for Fox.