Thanks for your post dude! I thought I was going to go without any arbitrary, irrelevant-to-the-thread, anti-iPad comments this morning but you saved the day!Right. You can also play Angry Birds on it. So it actually has two purposes.
Thanks for your post dude! I thought I was going to go without any arbitrary, irrelevant-to-the-thread, anti-iPad comments this morning but you saved the day!Right. You can also play Angry Birds on it. So it actually has two purposes.
Please, stop.
We can argue about whose news is biased, and whose isn't. At the end of the day, most journalists are slanted one way or the other, and it reflects through the networks and newspapers.
The Daily, not Murdoch, seems pretty centered. Things may change, but for now, it's really just a fun news/entertainment/sports/everything app.
I thought this was going to require iOS 4.3. Did I completely make that up?
no - the rumor sites made this one up- just because it's on a rumor site, doesn't mean it is true (that is half of the fun of reading rumor sites)
Is there something I need to turn off to not get billed after the 2 week free trial? Or just delete the app the day before it ends?
For those in Canada or Australia, I hear the Daily is available now.
ZAiPhone said:No 4.2 does not support subscription therefore 4.3 will release with in 14 day free trial period.
This is more iPad hysteria. When not hire a few more folks and put out an iPhone/iPod touch formatted version. You'll only expand your target audience by 1,000%+ ??? Not to mention I see a lot of folks sitting in coffee shops in front of MacBook Pros. I'm sure this is coming and this is just media manipulation to counter Android Tablet buzz post CES. I'm betting the iPad exclusive will go away after 12 months or less.
I'm waiting on iPad 2. Then I'll decide if I want the new shiny toy or get a discount refurb old model.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
In degrees of bias no one exceeds Fox News, that's why they admitted to being mostly opinion in the UK recently.
They're audience is beyond loyal though, it's a bit cultish. No one who pays close attention to news thinks that CNN has a liberal bias, CNN just isn't very good at news, period.
To make a blanket statement like 'all news has bias' has some degree of 'truthiness,' but it also gives the false impression that there are equal levels of bias. That is definitely not true, Fox News exceeds any level of bias seen anywhere in 'news.'
Objective news doesn't have a middle, factual news cuts both ways depending on who did what.
It's not suprising to see Fox posting in support of Fox, but Fox basically maintains the same audience that they have everywhere. I don't think they are going to pick up a lot of readers if it's the same content they have everywhere else.
What on earth are you talking about?
Fox is not neutral in any way, shape or form, and this technically crafted trojan horse won't be either.
Read:
- CNN
- BBC news
- El Pais (España)
Then compare to fox/the daily. If you can say that these last two are neutral... well, you know... Nothing else to say.