Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I had the opposite experience with a seller. I purchased a part out G5 Quad which ended up not being a quad. Upon informing the seller of the issue he offered to refund the purchase price but not the shipping amount (which was more than the purchase price). This was unacceptable to me because he advertised it as one thing and it turned out to be something else.

I informed him I would be forced to use Ebays buyer protection if he didn't refund the entire amount and, that by doing so, he would be responsible for the return shipping. Instead of cutting his loses he refused forcing me to use the buyer protection.

I know some sellers want the item back to ensure that buyers aren't scamming them but since this was a parts only sale for little money (I think I paid $35 for it) there was little for him to lose by letting me keep it.
I'm loathe to leave negative feedback or complain to eBay's customer services dept because most problems should be resolvable with just a little bit of decency and compromise but it seems that's beyond some people.

They appear to lack the self-awareness to understand that it's in their best interests to reach an amicable agreement with the buyer but instead they prefer to play unecessary games and ignore messages.

It's really short-sighted behaviour on a practicality level alone because when I had a similar issue to yours a couple of years ago, someone at the UK call-centre informed me that whenever eBay has to intercede with buyer protection, the seller's cards are effectively marked.
I had one experience a few months back where I ordered some lightning cables from a vendor in Florida that I've used before. I like their cables, unfortunately now I won't buy from them.

Shipping was free and my package was out for delivery. Suddenly it changed to customer pickup. Now the PO for me is 30 minutes away. If I go there, waste no time and return directly that's an hour of travel time. There's only one reason why the package should suddenly change to customer pickup when it's out for delivery and that's because the package had insufficient postage. So not only would I be wasting an hour, I'd have to pay the additional postage for 'free shipping'.

I don't like this brand of cables THAT MUCH. So, I messaged the guy and explained this. I managed to get the PO to 're-deliver' the package. A week, week and a half goes by and nothing happens. No package. So I told the guy this time that I wanted a refund. He files a claim on ME with eBay!

eBay gave me a courtesy refund and you know what? Within an hour that package MOVED. It went back to Florida, but it moved. If you advertise free shipping then you gotta pay the charges - not me.
 
I wonder about sales at these WTF prices. I am looking to purchase a vintage 80386 system and asking prices are indeed WTF. But I have to wonder if they're actually selling for these prices. When I make reasonable offers I am either rejected or the offer expires without any response from the seller. Yet I continue to see the same listings each time I check.
What about building your own 386? It's a fairly simply process. You buy a case, get a motherboard and a cpu, buy the cards and drives and plug it all in.

I had a 286 that was homebuilt in 1990 and other than a Hewlett Packard 486 in 1994 all my other systems were builds.
 
Assuming you can get a 386 mainboard, CPU and the other required stuff at “non-WTF” prices these days…
You beat me to the explanation. Parts or whole everything is priced at WTF but it doesn't seem to be moving at WTF pricing :)

What surprised me is how these sellers will pass on a sure purchase in the hopes of selling at an WTF price. In fact, before I make an offer, I wait a few months so that I know they've had an opportunity to sell it at WTF.
 
How did you get on with it?
I have confirmed it is a power supply issue and I just began the troubleshooting process yesterday afternoon. I suspect a number of bad capacitors and the ESR meter appears to support this suspicion. I need to pull the suspect capacitors and test them (just for knowledge sake, I intend to replace them either way). Substituting a known working power supply and the system started up fine.
 
The various commercial ports of Unix to the PC (e.g. BSD/OS, OpenDesktop/OpenServer, Solaris, UnixWare) might also be fun to explore.

Would they be available to a 386 machine in the form of recent versions? You'll have to excuse my ignorance on this front.
 
The various commercial ports of Unix to the PC (e.g. BSD/OS, OpenDesktop/OpenServer, Solaris, UnixWare) might also be fun to explore.
Some possibilities to consider. Since this is a PS/2 some options aren't available to me (for example the earliest releases of NetBSD do not support the MCA architecture so I have to go with later releases)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1
It's a model 70, the very first of the PS/2 line. I'll have to investigate AIX. I've thought about OS/2 too.
OS/2 probably makes the most sense for MCA systems. You should be able to get the drivers for expansion cards. I've got a SCSI controller board somewhere. It is HUGE.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1
OS/2 probably makes the most sense for MCA systems. You should be able to get the drivers for expansion cards. I've got a SCSI controller board somewhere. It is HUGE.
I think I'll need to purchase a memory expansion card. This afternoon I ended up pulling out the caps and three of them tested bad. I've reached out to my cap supplier and he's going to put together a list. However he did say getting caps is tough these days. We'll see.
 
Yesterday morning, during a stroll through my neighbourhood I came across this TV which had been dumped outside someone's home:

YO6XkHz.jpg


The photo really doesn't do justice to elegance of the styling. I decided to take a chance and lug it home and see if it works. For a "modern TV" it was surprisingly weighty. Here's the rear label information:

uhmBawW.jpg


"Assembled in Europe" but of course the parts were manufactured elsewhere... Anyway, let's have a look at the ports and see what's available.

jABTbQR.jpg


  • SCART/PERITEL/EUROCONNECTOR
  • S-VIDEO
  • 3.5mm Headphone Jack
  • RCA/PHONO Composite Video
  • RCA/PHONO Stereo Audio Inputs
  • UHF/VHF Antenna In
  • RS232C Control Port

Not a bad line-up but the omission of DVI and VGA is a tremendous shame, especially seeing as they'd included RS232C - which is really interesting and there appears to have been a missed opportunity in marketing this product to computer users given the RS232C presence. HDMI, which was starting to gain prevalence amongst new TVs during 2006 is also absent. The biggest concern though is, does the TV even work?

After looking through the user manual, the service manual and online photos I was able to conclude that it doesn't require an external mains transformer (one of my other LCD TVs does) and I just needed to locate a C5 3pin power cable and brief rummage around soon sorted that out. :)

The red standby light sprung to life and encouraged by that, I pressed the power button and...

Mu6ddrN.jpg


This is a good sign! :D Looking through the user manual I learned that it's a multi-system TV with full compatibility for NTSC and all variations of PAL and SECAM. I suppose the voltage details on the rear label should've given me a clue that although it was primarily intended for the EU market, it can be used globally and with equipment from around the world. Unfortunately the connectivity options limit it to standard definition video signals and the 4:3 display is outmoded in an age where 16:9 dominates - which is probably why it was abandoned.

Obviously in this forum, retro is our speciality and I've got no end of hardware that's perfectly suited to this TV. The fellow freebie 80s computer whose repair and restoration was covered in this thread was an immediate candidate. I connected up the A/V cables and voila - the pair worked together harmoniously. :)

h8GQuPJ.jpg


J8a0snE.jpg


GeFIe3Z.jpg


UICzXxa.jpg


In closing, this TV is a lovely addition and the picture quality is pretty solid - far better than my photos convey and it's a godsend for older hardware which uses the 4:3 aspect ratio. I'll have to see how it fares with my Dreamcast - because only one of my TVs is able to cope with whatever video trickery has been used by homebrew programmers for their games.

There's a couple of dead/stuck pixels but that's a minor issue and the LCD, along with the TV itself is in good condition so what can I complain about? Perhaps that the owner didn't include the remote control but I've been able to access all the options via the side panel anyway. ;)
 
Last edited:
Not a bad line-up but the omission of DVI and VGA is a tremendous shame, especially seeing as they'd included RS232C [...]
The port that is marked "For Service" looks just like a standard 15-pin VGA connector to me.

Accordingly, the manual says a VGA (and DVI) input is available as an option. Does the input menu/selector list VGA or "PC" by any chance?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TheShortTimer
The port that is marked "For Service" looks just like a standard 15-pin VGA connector to me.

That was my immediate suspicion as well when I saw it. :)

Accordingly, the manual says a VGA (and DVI) input is available as an option. Does the input menu/selector list VGA or "PC" by any chance?

Following the instructions listed here in the manual...

edViH0N.png


fPR8JLm.jpg


As you can see, the input options available on my TV are severely limited in comparison to those shown in the manual for various models. This is why I thought it was peculiar for LG to omit the VGA/DVI ports on my model whilst retaining the RS232C port because to me, it seems that its full potential is crippled by this choice.
 
@TheShortTimer: Do you have a source capable of outputting a RGB video signal? It would be interesting to check whether the TV accepts RGB input via SCART, as that would provide a much better picture quality than composite video.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TheShortTimer
@TheShortTimer: Do you have a source capable of outputting a RGB video signal? It would be interesting to check whether the TV accepts RGB input via SCART, as that would provide a much better picture quality than composite video.

Oh, it definitely features RGB via SCART and I would've been really surprised if it didn't. Here it is confirmed in the manual:

2mw4WbA.png


I've got immediate access to a dozen devices (computers, consoles and set-top boxes) which are capable of outputting RGB signals and if you like, I'll gladly set up one of them if you want to see it in action on that front. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1
As it said "for service" on the label, I wonder if the socket is buried as an output rather than an input somewhere else in the settings menu?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.