- There are PLENTY of mini tablets out there running iOS, Android, and Windows 10. HP, Dell, Samsung, Amazon, Apple, Asus, Lenovo, Acer, LG - all big players making mini tablets - and that's not all.
I'm aware. However, I don't see too many people using or buying these. Do you?
2. Oh, your missing Nexus 7? Rumors say it's on the way. In terms of quality, The Nexus 7 was close to the Mini, but not in terms of sales. In terms of Sales you need to look at the Kindle Fire and Samsung Tab.
The Nexus 7 was quite popular for its day. It was reviewed well, and...more importantly...they weren't uncommon in the wild, which is to say that, unlike the tablets you mention above, people actually bought and used them. Also, would love a source for those rumors. I have heard nothing about a return of the Nexus 7. The Nexus 9 is all but gone, having been replaced by the Pixel C which is trying to attack the iPad Air and the iPad Pro (again, Google clearly doesn't see a competition in the mini tablet arena that it can't simply quash with the Nexus 6/6P).
3.Amazon has done most of their engineering in software with the Kindles. In terms of the larger devices, there's no more 'heft' than the smaller devices.
Last I checked (which was minutes ago), the 7" tablet was literally a piece of crap akin to the original iPad mini if that. The specs got better with the 8" but it still looked like the 10" is where they really were packing the most specs/value.
4. The diminished time in the keynote is only evidence that the event concentrated on the iPad Pro and new Apple TV. It;s not the first time Apple shortchanged an updated product in favor of other, sexier hardware. Besides which, the update, while substantial, didn't provide anything new, so why keynote it? Maybe the mini won't get huge fanfare, but that's not evidence Apple is done with the mini.
It was the most substantial update it has ever gotten...probably ever. The retina display and the A7 of the second generation mini was pretty huge when it dropped in 2013, but it was externally identical to the first generation. With the mini 4, you have the most substantial update and it receives barely a mention. If that's not diminished interest from Apple, I don't know what is.
5. True, they haven;t engineered anything new on the mini, but maybe that's the point. The mini doesn't need new engineering, just current engineering.
A8 is last year's processor tech. A9 is this year's processor tech. So, yes, I'd agree that an A9-based iPad mini would make me feel a lot less like the iPad mini was an afterthought to Apple. As it stands, even if it was perpetually a gen behind, that wouldn't bother me, but where it was the talk of the town in 2012, I wouldn't be shocked if it got less and less attention as time went on. You'd have to figure that if it was their best-selling iPad, they would give it the same white glove treatment like the 13" MacBook Pro gets for the Mac product line.
5. Again, with marketing - as great as the mini 4 is, it's a point release - they don't make big advertising pushes on point release MacBooks, and it doesn't mean they're going to stop making MacBooks.
Overall, all we have is one crappy release and subsequent good release, but nothing new and no new marketing.
The iPad mini 4, a point release? Are you serious? The iPad mini 3 was the point release. Actually, no, scratch that. The iPad mini 2 added the display and made the jump to 64-bit iOS-land. But even that was only iterative. The iPad mini 3 just added in TouchID, making it that much less substantial of a release. The iPad mini 4 was probably the most substantial release they've had since the first iPad mini, but it had zero fanfare. If anything, it should've had more fanfare for what it is and was relative to (a) its predecessors, and (b) other iPads in the line (it's way better than either the mini 2 or mini 3 or even the first generation Air).
Also, "sketchy" as this report may have been, it has proven to be otherwise spot on so far:
https://www.macrumors.com/2015/07/15/no-new-ipad-air-2015/
How about this: When you walk into an Apple Store, the minis are front and center - is this the act of a dead product?
Not sure which Apple Store you go to. At the one I go to, the iPhone 6s and 6s Plus are front and center. To the left, you have the iPad mini 2 and the original iPad Air mixed in with the iPad Air 2. On the opposite side from that you have some iPad Air 2 units and some iPad mini 4 units with the iPad Pro opposite those against the wall of the store. Honestly, the only uniformity about any of it is that the iPad Pros are all against the wall. Otherwise, the rest of the lineup appears scattered throughout. That tells me nothing conclusive other than that, for some reason, Apple is even more ambivalent about their two and a half year old tablets, their one and a half year old tablet, and their five month old mini tablet. It's obvious that the spotlight is on the iPad Pro now. However, they seem poised to return that spotlight to the iPad Air with the launch of the iPad Air 3. The point of this entire conjecture is that said spotlight will likely never be on the iPad mini line to such a degree. Apple has real marketing emphasis on the iPad Pro now as it did on the iPad Air 2 before as it did on the original iPad Air. We will see that again with the iPad Air 3. We should've seen it with the iPad mini 4 but didn't and I think that would logically seem less indicative of a bright future for the line than it would a maturation or declination of the line.