Is that practical when WiFi consumes massive amounts of power compared to BT?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The iPhone 14 Is Unlikely to Be Portless, Here's Why
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Portless will only work if Apple can come out with a battery that lasts two days with normal usage.
I can see myself doing great with a portless iPhone, but I am also aware of a lot of edge cases where having a physical port is an advantage or even a requirement.
I think Apple should go portless on the iPhone 14 (the majority of users don't really have any use for the lightning port) and replace lightning with USB-C on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max (Pro users would benefit greatly from USB-C transfer speeds + easy connectivity with third-party accessories).
I think Apple should go portless on the iPhone 14 (the majority of users don't really have any use for the lightning port) and replace lightning with USB-C on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max (Pro users would benefit greatly from USB-C transfer speeds + easy connectivity with third-party accessories).
The phones may have WiFi 6 but not many have that at home yet.
This has already been solved with devices like carplay2air and the like. I’m honestly shocked apple hasn’t already come out with such a device of their own. I added wireless CarPlay to my 2017 Honda Civic with this years ago
That would be a good dual strategy. Would also force some people to pay more for the Pro model if they wanted the charging port. So Apple would make more money that way.
For whatever benefits Lightning may have over USB-C in Apple’s eyes, there are just more benefits to USB-C. Imagine an iPhone that is branded Pro that shoots in ProRes and ProRAW that had a USB-C/Thunderbolt port to actually being able to timely transfer all that data off the phone.
I wish the Lightning connector had been adopted as the standard for USB-C. It's smaller and is a lot more secure when attached. I've run into problems with current USB-C connectors wiggling loose or being finicky about their connection.
The article missed the most-important point, iPhones need to continue to offer a "low-latency" External Mic option !
Otherwise, A/V Sync becomes more complicated.
Otherwise, A/V Sync becomes more complicated.
Agree. Apple is not at all intimidated by repositioning a message. They have some of the best in the biz at spin. Not at all the issue here.
As mentioned above, the state of CarPlay and revenue from MFi for things like 3rd party microphones and other accessories are more likely the reason. While I find the concept of portless interesting, I don’t yet see that as anything ready for prime time. Will be interesting to see how they navigate this over the next decade. Does seem we’re due for one of those feather ruffling cable/connection shakeups that forces an evolution.
Last edited:
So many people want USB-C to replace the Lightning port (especially since Apple is adopting it in so many other places) and yet all the stories still center on NO ports...
I truly hope they don't go wireless for a long time. There's no decent wireless data transfer solution yet, and unless they can come up with one that matches USB3 or 4 speeds, there's absolutely no benefit in opting for a worse solution than what exists in the phone right now. I used to be a firm advocate of USB-C in the next iPhone but honestly, as long as we get USB-C speeds, I don't mind them keeping the lightning connector. If it went fully portless, I doubt I'd buy the phone.
They would need to solve transferring ProRes 4K video files at a palatable rate.
Sorry, Apple will get rid of the Lightning Port for the same reason they got rid of the headphone jack– to sell you something. In getting rid of the headphone jack, they wanted you to buy a 159$ Apple AirPod or a 9$ dongle. And for USB functionality, they want you to buy an iPad.
I think the portless iPhone will be the next butterfly keyboard. It will cause everyone, including Apple, lots of problems for a very minor benefit.
I'm just pissed that Apple doesn't include the charger with the purchase of their devices. The BS they told us was that they already gave us a bunch of these and they want to have a postive impact on the environment. Then they switched to USB-C....which Apple has NEVER provided a charger to me for this, except for my MacBook.
I see the port as a feature. You can use it or don't. It's not common that folks are like 'give me less features'. If they sell you a phone that is portless, what? Now you can brag about having a phone with one less feature? Yay! I have a portless phone. Look at me! Personally, I just don't understand how some have it in their minds that having a portless phone is some end goal to achieve.
I see the port as a feature. You can use it or don't. It's not common that folks are like 'give me less features'. If they sell you a phone that is portless, what? Now you can brag about having a phone with one less feature? Yay! I have a portless phone. Look at me! Personally, I just don't understand how some have it in their minds that having a portless phone is some end goal to achieve.
In the same boat also. Only way would maybe use magsafe to transfer from iPhone to CarPlay. Using bluetooth by passes CarPlay interface on mine. Phone and music work but nav does not. No Siri=No Prompts.
Lightning is a great connector, probably better than USB type-C, but Apple hates it and has left it at USB 2.0 speeds. But at least it's not portless. They need to upgrade the port somehow. Either give the Lightning Port USB 3 or 4 speeds or give the iPhone actual USB 3 type-C or USB 4.
I don't want to buy a brand new iPhone that is gimped with such an outdated port, but I don't want a crappy portless phone either. Apple needs to quit trying to make the iPhone a second-class citizen to the iPad. I want an iPhone that is just as capable as an iPad.
I think the auhor makes the mistake of assuming it's an all-or-nothing proposition. Why couldn't it simply be one model of the iPhone 14 range that's portless? This would allow Apple to 'measure the size of the market' for such device and work out any kinks in data-/power-related matters before going full-hilt with portliest iPhones. At the same time, it'll allow those who need a port (now) to continue to have that option.
i am holding on to my Xs Max until either USB-C or portless. I don’t want to keep lightning cables any longer than necessary.
also, Apple could conceivably use a MagSafe like on the new MacBooks Pro. Give it a data channel And you effectively have a “portless” iphone. Of course then it’s another unique cable….
also, Apple could conceivably use a MagSafe like on the new MacBooks Pro. Give it a data channel And you effectively have a “portless” iphone. Of course then it’s another unique cable….
It's very likely to effect it at least a little. The induction coil is right on top of the battery. I think there's a little insulation in between, but it's still going to be getting extra heat from that. Not sure how big of a difference it makes, though. There doesn't seem to be a big advantage in induction charging over using the Lightning port. They're having to use more breakable glass backs to aid the induction charging, plus it less efficient and creates more heat. It's not that big of a deal to have to plug in a cable.
TheYayAreaLiving 🎗️
Suspended
Personally, I’m not a big fan of the MagSafe. Anytime I tried to use it. It makes my iPhone extremely hot. I think Apple should introduce USB-C to the iPhones in the future. I think that’s what people would want. The future for wireless charging has not been technologically advanced yet still.
Last edited:
Thank god it hasn't. Otherwise we wouldn't be able to connect external display or many high-speed peripherals.
Connectors are always trade-offs between physical size, stability/longevity and signal bandwidth.
Lightning is an 8-pin connector.
USB-C has 24 pins.
That said, Apple could have easily consolidated their iPad lineup to use USB-C, instead of milking customers of "the cheap one" with Lightning peripherals.
Me, I prefer Lightning connectors in an iPhone. The charging cables are small. I don't intend to carry around a much larger MagSafe cable for charging. I also don't like sacrificing charging speed or efficiency for portlessness. And USB2.0 speeds are still reasonable (though not "fast") to restore or move data off/on my Phone.
USB-C is much more finicky, connectors much more prone to become disconnected, dirty, accumulating lint and becoming loose. It's a great idea on a phone theoretically and on technical specs. But less so considering the wear and tear of everyday use.
They’ll still make bank from selling cables for their other devices and selling MagSafe accessories for the portless iPhones.
Idk… I personally am not looking forward to a portless iPhone, but then again I guess I could be ok with it if the battery life significantly improves and MagSafe can do “fast charging”.