The irony of Samsung/TSMC nonsense

Discussion in 'iPhone' started by mobilehavoc, Oct 10, 2015.

  1. mobilehavoc macrumors 6502

    mobilehavoc

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    #1
    The reason the Samsung SOC has slightly less battery life than TSMC is because the Samsung can run at a higher clock speed for sustained periods without throttling. This is due to the smaller 14nm size.

    So battery tests that strain the CPU will result in more consistent performance but higher battery drain since there's less throttling. So it depends what you really want from your phone. I don't live in a jungle so can charge my phone when needed and I'd rather have consistent performance and less throttling with a small impact on battery life. Remember when the SOC throttles it uses less battery.

    We went through this a few years ago on Android with Snapdragon and Samsung SOCs as they improved the process.
     
  2. MCube74 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    #2
    Yes but the phone with Samsung Soc are not performing as well in the test and are running hot.
     
  3. mobilehavoc thread starter macrumors 6502

    mobilehavoc

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    #3
    Not in my tests. My Samsung 6S benches higher then the TSMCs I've seen posted and hasn't gotten hot. Could be just certain chips.
     
  4. Appl3FTW macrumors 603

    Appl3FTW

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
  5. MCube74 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    #5
    Well most of the tests I have seen are just the opposite with TMSC performing better. It wouldnt be an issue and there wouldn't be many threads discussing this if Samsung chip was better.
     
  6. mobilehavoc thread starter macrumors 6502

    mobilehavoc

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    #6
    Everything I've seen is the Samsung is same or better in performance but less on battery.
     
  7. Gathomblipoob macrumors 601

    Gathomblipoob

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2009
    #7
    And people wonder why Apple doesn't disclose more of its specs.
     
  8. bambooshots macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2013
    #8
    On a mobile device, I'll prioritize battery life over pure performance.

    Especially for something like a smartphone.

    Portable computer or not, watching videos, composing emails, browsing the web, maybe some gaming is about the extent of taxing activities on my device. I've made video edits perhaps thrice in the year I've had my phone.

    That being said, I still haven't checked what chip is in my device!
     
  9. Azzin macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2010
    Location:
    London, England.
  10. mobilehavoc thread starter macrumors 6502

    mobilehavoc

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    #10
    That's fine. My use I'm always by a charger and I prefer performance since you can't change that. Battery I can just charge it etc.

    Again the difference is not that drastic as benchmarks show. If all you do is run games or CPU intensive apps then yes the battery gap might be bigger but for normal mixed usage I think Apples estimate for 2-3% is right.
     
  11. AbSoluTc macrumors 68040

    AbSoluTc

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    #11
    If it's not that drastic or big of a deal, why another thread to justify it?
     
  12. kruso2 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2012
    #12
    Also little annoying that it gets so hot. Can't be good for the components?
     
  13. asleep macrumors 68040

    asleep

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    #13
    Yeah but winter is coming, so that's good. [​IMG]
     
  14. CE3, Oct 10, 2015
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2015

    CE3 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2014
    #14
    It's funny that initially a lot of people were posting they wanted the Samsung chip over the TSMC, and now it's TSMC or bust! Some are speculating that Samsung somehow trolled Apple with their chip. I doubt that. There's nothing wrong with the Samsung chip itself, it's just not as ideal for the battery Apple put in the 6S as the TSMC. It's possible a software update will level things out.. and some are already seeing good battery life with it.

    Completely agree. I think both chips will be able to handle video edits and other cpu intensive processes just fine, though.
     
  15. Aceroller macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2015
    #15
    I have the Samsung chip and my 6S runs great with great battery life.
     
  16. MCube74, Oct 10, 2015
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2015

    MCube74 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    #16
    We talk so much about performance like as if we are carrying a desktop computer.

    The most important thing for a mobile device is a good battery life.


    iPhone 6s plus with Samsung chip is fine since the battery life will be better than the iPhone 6s with TMSC anyway.

    However the iPhone 6s with Samsung chip will be something to worry about. One of the reasons why people chose to go for the Plus was bigger battery capacity. So now with the Samsung chip would be even worse than those with TMSC chip.

    As for performance, both Samsung and TMSC chips will provide better performance compared to last year's iPhone 6. So performance is not so much of a concern as is battery capacity and overheating.
     
  17. MCube74 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    #17
    If that is the case then we are people who got their phones with Samsung chip so annoyed and are planning to have their phones replaced?
     
  18. Lobwedgephil macrumors 68040

    Lobwedgephil

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2012
    #18
    Most of what I've seen is the opposite, it performs worse and less battery. Now thats ironic.
     
  19. realeric macrumors 6502a

    realeric

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Location:
    United States
    #19
    It's nice for you to volunteer to use Samsung's crappy AP. You balance our eco world.
     
  20. Aceroller macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2015
    #20
    I guess it really comes down to how you use your phone. But then again I haven't compared mine to a non-Samsung chip phone. I just know that know mine is lasting through the day and delivering excellent performance. So I personally am not upset about it. :)
     
  21. MCube74 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    #21
    Exactly that is how the news got heated up over the internet.
     
  22. magbarn macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2008
    #22
    Who cares about the performance difference? It's around 1% which people can't notice. Meanwhile the tsmc has much more than 1% better battery life especially when the phone is driven hard and that is noticeable for people who game and run their phones other than Facebook.
     
  23. MCube74 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    #23
    Lol
     
  24. MCube74 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    #24
    That is nice.

    Performance will be good with both chips and you probably won't even notice the difference in performance between both chips, unless you sit and run benchmarks.

    However, battery life you can notice because once you run out of battery you will be running around looking for a charger.
     
  25. masotime macrumors 68000

    masotime

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2012
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    #25
    I find it funny that people are calling their iPhones "Samsung 6S". It's funny when you realize how close that nomenclature is to "Samsung Galaxy S6".
     

Share This Page