Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yes and no. It won't work as easy as just swap a new one in, but you can upgrade it if you can find the upgrade modules and want to take the risk to void your warranty.
It’s ridiculous that installing more storage would void your warranty. Imagine if Apple tried to pull that when they were using hard drives
 
Thunderbolt 4 drives run faster than the M4's internal 256 GB drive, which is good enough for most people. And if it isn't good enough, you have the option of buying the M4 Pro model.
Erm….no, internal is faster, and the pro model is overkill
 
Erm….no, internal is faster, and the pro model is overkill

OWC 1M2 USB 4 / Thunderbolt 4 drive:

owc-express-1m2-has-arrived-fast-enough-for-what-i-need-it-v0-gr5zj5atcjqc1.jpeg

M4 Mac mini 256 GB:

Screenshot 2024-11-08 at 20.00.34.png
The 512 GB M4 Mac mini is faster than both though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: masotime
I'm pleased with my base M4 Pro mini. But haven't I seen Windows users post screenshots of something called CyrstalDiskmark with 7000+?
 

Attachments

  • diskspeed-MiniPro.jpeg
    diskspeed-MiniPro.jpeg
    139.1 KB · Views: 75
I'm pleased with my base M4 Pro mini. But haven't I seen Windows users post screenshots of something called CyrstalDiskmark with 7000+?
I didn't understand your post, but there is no CrystalDiskMark on macOS. However, on macOS, an app with an identical interface is available, called AmorphousDiskMark.

Speeds of 7000+ are common with PCIe gen 4 x 4 drives, while PCIe gen 5 x 4 drives can go much, much faster than that. I might expect the Mac Studio to exceed 7000+ MB/s next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LelandHendrix
It’s ridiculous that installing more storage would void your warranty. Imagine if Apple tried to pull that when they were using hard drives

Hard drives on Intel laptops were not user-replaceable. It I remember correctly, replacing them did void your warranty.

At the same time, the HDDs Apple used werent your standard models either. They came with improved shock protection and custom firmware that featured better data integrity protection. Same is true for Apple SSDs by the way. They guarantee correct data flush, which means your data don’t be corrupted on power loss for certain applications. Not all third-party drives offer this guarantee because it’s bad for benchmarks.
 
Hard drives on Intel laptops were not user-replaceable. It I remember correctly, replacing them did void your warranty.

At the same time, the HDDs Apple used werent your standard models either. They came with improved shock protection and custom firmware that featured better data integrity protection. Same is true for Apple SSDs by the way. They guarantee correct data flush, which means your data don’t be corrupted on power loss for certain applications. Not all third-party drives offer this guarantee because it’s bad for benchmarks.
Doesn’t excuse the fact if apples going to have non soldered storage, there’s no reason for them to lock it down. They boast about the carbon neutral stuff but still resist right to repair. Fingers crossed the EU goes after them for this
 
Doesn’t excuse the fact if apples going to have non soldered storage, there’s no reason for them to lock it down. They boast about the carbon neutral stuff but still resist right to repair. Fingers crossed the EU goes after them for this

I don’t see how it violates right to repair. Bring it to a service center and they’ll repair it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
I don’t see how it violates right to repair. Bring it to a service center and they’ll repair it.
Yeah that’s not exactly what the right to repair argument is about.

My hunch is that non-soldered storage is becoming a thing with Apple because I’ve long argued that personal storage should not be permanently soldered to an entire unit.

To me it’s been the strongest argument against Apple and how they build laptops.

Phones too for that matter.
 
Beg to differ about the term subsidies though. The first tier products are profitable, I don`t believe Apple ever manufacture Macs, iPhones or perpherials bestowed with no profit margin. What they do is countering the lower profits, but that are not subsidies.
The term subsidies is not applied to only unprofitable items.
 
  • Like
Reactions: subjonas
Yeah that’s not exactly what the right to repair argument is about.

What does right to repair mean to you precisely?


To me it’s been the strongest argument against Apple and how they build laptops.

Phones too for that matter.

That is fair. This is why it’s important to have different companies that make different products.
 
It literally means what it says on the tin. You should be able to replace this stuff yourself. You can’t, you have to go to Apple

So right to repair means being able to repair stuff yourself at home? Where do you draw the line at what you should be able or not able to repair? Like, do you have the right to repair a broken CPU at home? A broken LiPo battery?

BTW, I’m quite sure that you can replace it at home. Doesn’t Apple have these repair programs where they give you manuals and tools, and you can install parts yourself? Maybe it’s not available for the new Macs yet.

P.S. Here is the list of orderable parts, I suppose they will appear in the self-repair shop soon https://support.apple.com/en-us/121008
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: subjonas and kitKAC
I guess the title should read

"The Mac mini 2024 actually has socketed SSS"

Solid state storage, as the driver is in the T2.
Or something like that.
 
Alternatively, the socketed SSD chips are not about repairability at all. Why need to make the SSD easier to repair? SSD are highly reliable components (unlike HDD). And the socketed SSD are buried moderately deep into the assembly, making their replacement require a signficant amount of disassembly.

Perhaps having socketed SSD is about improving the efficiency of the assembly process [at the factory]. Limiting the variety of motherboard that need to be manufactored. Making the configuration of the SSD drive part of the assembly process instead of part of the motherboard fabrication process.
 
Hard drives on Intel laptops were not user-replaceable. It I remember correctly, replacing them did void your warranty.

At the same time, the HDDs Apple used werent your standard models either. They came with improved shock protection and custom firmware that featured better data integrity protection. Same is true for Apple SSDs by the way. They guarantee correct data flush, which means your data don’t be corrupted on power loss for certain applications. Not all third-party drives offer this guarantee because it’s bad for benchmarks.
Incorrect. The hard drive is user replaceable, and Apple actually put it in the user manual about how to replace the hard drive. The warranty is only voided for the hard drive.
 
Bc dm
As I said before, my fears have been confirmed. The aerodynamics are the worst. The design of the fan is extremely bad - there will be mixing of air masses.
The joints that I see:
1)One heat pipe. Well Apple, is it so difficult to learn the laws of physics and design features. The diameter of the heat pipe is too small, there is no reserve for effective heat dissipation. The chip itself will be trotting, but also the memory. Two heat pipes, because they work independently and more efficiently. Normal cooling systems use at least 2 heat pipes - one between “chip heat sink and heatsink”, and the second between “memory heat sink - heatsink”. RAM memory hates overheating. And here is a common substrate.
2)The cooling radiator is a crescent moon. Uh, okay. A shape is a shape. Why is the effective area reduced!? For the sake of design!? It doesn't fit!? Why cut and rounded. The cooling efficiency is also reduced on the sides compared to the center, by 15-20 percent. Another disadvantage. You could have narrowed the fan housing and made it tulip-shaped. Judging by the space between the motherboard and the cooler case it was possible to install a larger fan by area. Apparently, they are just lazy to release a new type of fan - why, shove the same fan wherever you can - maybe it will cool, and maybe not.
3)NAND module has no cooling at all.
4)Repairability I estimate at 7 points out of 10.
On the M4 Pro, the cooling system won't handle the heat under heavy load. The Mac Mini will whine like an airplane turbine, and it will get hotter too. Closed spaces in the recesses of desks, nightstands, as well as putting anti-dust pads on them are best avoided - it will overheat very quickly.
from a DIY perspective do you believe there is anything you can do to reduce any of these issues? Not looking for miracles just small things that you would try?
 
this is great news if not for upgrade ability, as it means repair and restoring data is more accessible than the soldered ssd of yore
 
So right to repair means being able to repair stuff yourself at home? Where do you draw the line at what you should be able or not able to repair? Like, do you have the right to repair a broken CPU at home? A broken LiPo battery?

BTW, I’m quite sure that you can replace it at home. Doesn’t Apple have these repair programs where they give you manuals and tools, and you can install parts yourself? Maybe it’s not available for the new Macs yet.

P.S. Here is the list of orderable parts, I suppose they will appear in the self-repair shop soon https://support.apple.com/en-us/121008
Yes. Exactly. And direct from Apple is nice, but they will likely charge more than anywhere else which defeats the purpose in the first place, there’s no reason for them to use proprietary parts other than forcing you to pay more through them.
 
Yes. Exactly. And direct from Apple is nice, but they will likely charge more than anywhere else which defeats the purpose in the first place,


So right to repair for you means mandating that manufacturers use user-replaceable industry-compatible parts? Who decides which parts are these and how is compatibility checked? Where do you set the boundary? Would your interpretation of right to repair for example preclude the use of Apple Silicon or their high-bandwidth memory modules since these are proprietary components without industry standards?

there’s no reason for them to use proprietary parts other than forcing you to pay more through them.

The functionality is different. Usual SSDs come equipped with a controller. Apple includes the controller on-chip. There are good reasons to do so, for example this gives you the ability to use system RAM as a controller cache. Apple SSDs also come with atomic data flush guarantees and a data loss prevention mechanism in case of power interruption. You are saying that all this should be made illegal under right to repair?
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.