Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How much is the 'other' usually on a 256 model? On my 500 right now I have 100gbs of 'other' 133gbs of media, 32gb of music, and 8gbs of music.
 
How much is the 'other' usually on a 256 model? On my 500 right now I have 100gbs of 'other' 133gbs of media, 32gb of music, and 8gbs of music.

I suppose you answered your own question then =)

What you listed adds up to be more than 256GB, so that isn't an option for you if you want everything on the internal drive.
 
Sorry, didn't mean to seem overly negative about your point/post but I think it came off that way.

Certainly Apple can and is innovating in the hardware space even if they manufacture very little of anything themselves and don't invent the fundamental technologies. They still tell their suppliers what to make and how to put it all together, i.e., they engineer their products. Most computer "manufacturers" just take whatever parts they can buy and slap them together as cheaply as possible.

Apple was the one who told their suppliers to make high resolution (Retina) screens for phones. Apple told their suppliers to CNC aluminum to make their laptops. etc.

The A# chips are a special case because that's a level of engineering that Apple rarely gets into, but they made a good investment in buying PA Semi to do this for them for sure. Unfortunately the days of rapid performance gains seem to be winding down but it's certainly an accomplishment to achieve what they have.

All good.

A lot of Apple's leverage comes from Tim Cook's leadership both as COO and CEO. Apple can dictate the terms because the have the up front capital for expenditures and the volume to soak up capacity.

Recall the sapphire plant story. A deal with Apple can make your company or break your company, and even a company like Intel can be bent to Apples whim (though certainly not completely controlled). The A-series chip is a great motivator to Intel, especially the A8X in the iPad Air 2 with respect to performance and battery life. Intel seems to be taking them (and ARM) seriously which is good for us all.

On that note, I do wonder what the focus of the A9/X will be. It seems like the chip team just pushed the pedal down on an open road and we got the awesome A8X out of it. And the software to really take advantage of it was left behind as a result. I doubt the chip team has taken the past year off.
 
How much is the 'other' usually on a 256 model? On my 500 right now I have 100gbs of 'other' 133gbs of media, 32gb of music, and 8gbs of music.

That view of what's taking up space on your computer is known to be buggy.

If you want a better way to see what's going on, I recommend a shareware program called Disk Inventory X.
 
...
On that note, I do wonder what the focus of the A9/X will be. It seems like the chip team just pushed the pedal down on an open road and we got the awesome A8X out of it. And the software to really take advantage of it was left behind as a result. I doubt the chip team has taken the past year off.

The improvement with the A8X is just that Apple added an extra core, so it has 3 cores whereas the A8 has 2 cores. That gets you bigger Geekbench numbers but usually not much else. Most software just runs on 1 core. So they didn't really do anything special. It's not hard to slap an extra core on a chip these days, and they had the power and temperature budget to do that in the iPad (and not the iPhone).

The A8 isn't that much faster than the A7. It's not too surprising, it had to happen sometime. Intel has been aggressively pushing the limits of high-performance computing for decades and they're on the logarithmic end of the improvement curve now. There's no reason to think Apple is on a different curve, they're just earlier on the same curve. So they will get closer and closer to catching up with Intel, the question now is just how long it will take them.

The interesting thing to me is that per GHz, according to Geekbench, the A8X is actually a little faster than Intel's fastest chip.

So what would be interesting is knowing what clock speed Apple could hit with the A8X if they cranked up the power. In other words, I don't know how much of the A8X's clock speed is limited by the power budget and how much it's limited simply by the design of the chip. If they could throw watts at it and get their 1.5GHz chip up into the 2.5GHz range, it might make a credible competitor to some of Intel's budget chips. But it would still be a ways off of Intel's 4GHz...
 
Look.

Take the 13" rMBP.
Remove all the ports and replace them with 2 USB-C/TB3 and 2 USB-A ports at the rear right and left (i.e. where the ports are on the Air).
Taper the case and fill it with new "sculpted" batteries as per the rMB, making it a bit lighter than the old rMBP.
Stick in a new-gen more energy efficient processor.
Cross out "MacBook Pro" and write "MacBook Air 2" on the case.

The Air lives on...

Seriously, that's what seems likely to happen at the next major MacBook range re-design (except Apple will probably take it one step too far and drop the USB-A ports as well). Even now, the current rMBP is only $300 more, smaller in 2 out of 3 dimensions and very slightly heavier than the Air - when it's re-designed, the Air will indeed be pointless.

Pro won't go, the Air will be removed in my "opinion". Air was just about portability and lightness - that gaps been taken by the rMB. The air has become the ginger haired step child. Maybe the 11" will stay around. Who knows..
 
Pro won't go, the Air will be removed in my "opinion". Air was just about portability and lightness - that gaps been taken by the rMB. The air has become the ginger haired step child. Maybe the 11" will stay around. Who knows..

They've still kept that non-retina MBP around, with little changes, if I recall correctly, because it still serves a particular market niche. I could see the Air in that category as well.

Two "active" lines and one maintenance one...as you say, who knows?
 
Pro won't go, the Air will be removed in my "opinion". Air was just about portability and lightness - that gaps been taken by the rMB. The air has become the ginger haired step child. Maybe the 11" will stay around. Who knows..
You are talking about future design choices and I agree.
But then: have you talked to children lately?
If you have, then you won't claim that the new macbook design has any future.

Going on the models available now, the air is still the gold standard ;)
 
We will never agree, i would buy around it everytime.. i see no reason to ever buy one.
Power Pro, portability rMP

People always tend to defend what they own.
 
We will never agree, i would buy around it everytime.. i see no reason to ever buy one.
Power Pro, portability rMP

People always tend to defend what they own.
I own a rmbp :D

I love my rmbp, because of the screen and power, but the Air is still the all around winner.

Anyway, touchscreens are the future. Kids do not even consider keyboards, mice and trackpad.
Those are for old people. ;)
 
I own a rmbp :D

I love my rmbp, because of the screen and power, but the Air is still the all around winner.

Anyway, touchscreens are the future. Kids do not even consider keyboards, mice and trackpad.
Those are for old people. ;)

The other thing they don't consider is wired connectivity...to them the furor over ports in the rMB is an anachronistic joke. My preferences, and yours, aren't theirs. And for a significant number, you're right about the touchscreen. Even my wife, who's a university professor, relies on a touchscreen and stylus for the computer she uses during class. The lack of a touchscreen and on-screen stylus support completely rules out any MacBook for her, and there are a lot of people like her out there. MR is an echo chamber. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meister
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.