Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No it doesn't. I charged my 10.1 TAB off PC USB. It needed a $2 adapter (or modified cable) and it was slow but overnight it would fully charge. Same for the iPad (no adapter needed). It charges without problem (other than speed) off USB despite the fact it shows "not charging."

Hmm last time I tried charging a Galaxy Tab from a USB charger it kept draining...I ended up having to find the wall unit to charge it.
 
Hmm last time I tried charging a Galaxy Tab from a USB charger it kept draining...I ended up having to find the wall unit to charge it.
You didn't have the adapter needed. It won't charge without it. This was the one I got: http://www.ebay.com/itm/PC-can-char...866211?pt=PDA_Accessories&hash=item20c2208b63

Edit: Actually that wasn't the one I got. The one I got was just an adapter that went between the regular cable and the PC. Same thing but it just didn't have the actual TAB connector on it. Basically all it does is short the 2 middle pins on the USB side so the TAB "thinks" it's plugged into the wall charger.
 
Last edited:
You didn't have the adapter needed. It won't charge without it. This was the one I got: http://www.ebay.com/itm/PC-can-char...866211?pt=PDA_Accessories&hash=item20c2208b63

Edit: Actually that wasn't the one I got. The one I got was just an adapter that went between the regular cable and the PC. Same thing but it just didn't have the actual TAB connector on it. Basically all it does is short the 2 middle pins on the USB side so the TAB "thinks" it's plugged into the wall charger.

Interesting. That's good to know. Thanks.
 
If the battery capacity almost doubled, why is the Wifi-only "New iPad" rated at just 10hrs - exactly the same as the iPad 2? I can only assume that the primary power hog is not LTE as most speculated (it only exacts a 1hr battery life penalty vs the wifi-only version) but rather the new high resolution display (after all the SoC is only marginally changed).
 
If the battery capacity almost doubled, why is the Wifi-only "New iPad" rated at just 10hrs - exactly the same as the iPad 2? I can only assume that the primary power hog is not LTE as most speculated (it only exacts a 1hr battery life penalty vs the wifi-only version) but rather the new high resolution display (after all the SoC is only marginally changed).

Yes, it's primarily the screen. Double the number of LEDs.
 
Yes, it's primarily the screen. Double the number of LEDs.

Not double, 4 times the pixels, combined with a quad-core GPU. Plus 40% more color saturation and a newer more powerful back-light for the screen.

Heck, my PC's GPU has two individual power cables running to it, on top of the power it's drawing from the board itself.
 
Not double, 4 times the pixels, combined with a quad-core GPU. Plus 40% more color saturation and a newer more powerful back-light for the screen.

Heck, my PC's GPU has two individual power cables running to it, on top of the power it's drawing from the board itself.

he's talking LED's lol. Not pixels. a retina screen requires a second LED bar. so double the leds are in the screen.
 
why isn't it BETTER

With so much extra battery capacity, I can understand it being necessary to support LTE, but why isn't the WIFI battery life MUCH higher than the ipad 2?

Does the retina display require THAT much more battery power to run, to display that much more information on screen? It almost seems like a bad trade off. Technically, we could have this ipad battery with an ipad 2 form factor and screen and have the ipad 2 run 15-18 hours on wifi?
 
Does the retina display require THAT much more battery power to run, to display that much more information on screen? It almost seems like a bad trade off.

It's not a bad trade-off. I use my iPad every day and most often it can go 2 days without me charging, sometimes even 3 and that's with WiFi, music and high brightness on.

Even when used heavily I've hardly ever managed to drain the iPad in one day.
 
Will be interesting to see what they do with the next iPad. In theory the A6 as well as the next gen LTE chips will be based on 28 nm process which should result in less power consumption and heat. Making room for a much larger battery now sets them up nicely for the next iPad to have a substantial increase in power while keeping the 10 hour battery life, or possibly extending the battery life to even crazier numbers.

So the ipad4 speculation begins...:D
 
It's not a bad trade-off. I use my iPad every day and most often it can go 2 days without me charging, sometimes even 3 and that's with WiFi, music and high brightness on.

Even when used heavily I've hardly ever managed to drain the iPad in one day.

Agreed. More battery life is always better, but 10 hours seems to be more than enough for most.

It IS surprising however that the retina power sucks as much juice as it does.
 
It IS surprising however that the retina power sucks as much juice as it does.

It really isn't. Its like ordering a 17 inch laptop. The entry level ones are rather light and have a small battery but the ones with a discrete GPU have larger batteries and a more powerful AC adapter. Graphics muscles are energy greedy.
 
I would rather the new battery was put in an iPad 2 for near double battery life!

I would also like an iPod the size of the original iPod (2003) with a battery life that lasts a month of daily use.:D

I think it is a bit of a shame that as tech advances, thinner and faster always wins over MASSIVE battery life. . . . .
Between my, Laptop, iPad, iPhone, Camera, GPS etc. I am always charging something!
 
Does this mean double the ipod time or pandora time when streaming/playing audio with the screen off?
 
Does this mean double the ipod time or pandora time when streaming/playing audio with the screen off?

Don't know, but I will run some real tests tomorrow unlike these so-called reviewers that get free iPads and paid big bucks to do so.
 
I have the new iPad as of this morning, and it seems to both drain slower than my iPad 2, but also charge much slower than my iPad 2. It will be interesting to see how it plays out over the next week in terms of speed of battery drain as well as slower battery charging.
 
For This of You Talking About Charging...

this is what I use:

http://store.apple.com/us/product/H1663ZM/A

H1663


No more wall-warts (except when traveling), a dual dock that handles iPhone and iPad in one compact device with stereo, remote and dual alarms.

I don't work for Apple, just like the device. Dual alarm clock radios that will charge devices are rare.
 
apparently

It really isn't. Its like ordering a 17 inch laptop. The entry level ones are rather light and have a small battery but the ones with a discrete GPU have larger batteries and a more powerful AC adapter. Graphics muscles are energy greedy.

apparently, it requires TWICE as many ? LEDS's to display, so it sort of makes sense. Twice as many, twice as much battery required - with something in there for optimization.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.