Yes, the right of first sale is what saves us from even more draconian rules.
I'm not sure we'll see meaningful reform of copyright laws by 2020. On one side of the issue is common sense. On the other side is money. Lobbyists do not work for common sense, they work for money. Congress does not listen to common sense from lobbyists, they listen to money.
I may be cynical, but I think the copyright laws will get worse, not better. Money tends to be like that.
I did jump around a bit, I guess. Here's the abbreviated version:
a) Copyright law sets the rules of content.
b) The earlier poster described a scenario that could be described under current law as stealing, as absurd as that sounds to us.
c) Much to the displeasure of content providers, Congress carved out some exceptions to the law that allow us to share content under certain specific conditions. They would love to change these exceptions if they could. Those exceptions do not include "sharing" a subscription on more than an occasional borrowing basis.
d) I only know what I've read about the issue. It's fairly deep, but not expert level by any means. I am not a lawyer.
I'm not sure we'll see meaningful reform of copyright laws by 2020. On one side of the issue is common sense. On the other side is money. Lobbyists do not work for common sense, they work for money. Congress does not listen to common sense from lobbyists, they listen to money.
I may be cynical, but I think the copyright laws will get worse, not better. Money tends to be like that.
Not sure I follow you here. First you go about how the copyright law control how we can share content. Than you call it stealing. Than you tell that the law permit it, so under certain exception it's not stealing, even if the publisher don't like it. So, what do you really know about it?
I did jump around a bit, I guess. Here's the abbreviated version:
a) Copyright law sets the rules of content.
b) The earlier poster described a scenario that could be described under current law as stealing, as absurd as that sounds to us.
c) Much to the displeasure of content providers, Congress carved out some exceptions to the law that allow us to share content under certain specific conditions. They would love to change these exceptions if they could. Those exceptions do not include "sharing" a subscription on more than an occasional borrowing basis.
d) I only know what I've read about the issue. It's fairly deep, but not expert level by any means. I am not a lawyer.