The Real Difference Between Blu-Ray and DVD

Discussion in 'Digital Video' started by XboxMySocks, Jan 17, 2010.

  1. XboxMySocks macrumors 68020

    XboxMySocks

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    #1
    Let me start this off by saying I am in no way a Sony advocate. I'd actually like nothing more than their awful company to be in shambles due to ****** products, ******** people and overall ****** performance, as you might tell I'm not very satisfied with them. However, occasionally even Sony can pull themselves out of the sh*tter and provide a good product. Below is a comparison of Sony's Blu-Ray (and who knows, maybe HD-DBDVDVDBVDVD would have been better, but porn went with Blu-Ray...) and the difference is actually quite staggering. I have both DVD and Blu-Ray copies (yes, absolutely obsessed) of Saw 6 and I recently ripped them and honestly, the difference is horrifically obvious.

    Here's Saw 6 on it's Blu-Ray counterpart: [​IMG]

    And here it is on DVD:
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Shaun.P macrumors 68000

    Shaun.P

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2003
    Location:
    Omicron Persei 8
    #2
    Is it just me or is the background in the second picture much better, aswell as the colour?
     
  3. XboxMySocks thread starter macrumors 68020

    XboxMySocks

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    #3
    Erm no, that's just a biproduct of me choosing a ****ing different scene that looks almost identical >.<
    Also, do you tend to pay more attention to the backrounds of movies instead of the main character? That's where the difference is ;)

    EDIT: Disregard the 'different scene' thing, I fixed it.
    Also, the differences in colour and saturation is because the DVD and Blu-Ray were different region releases at different times.
     
  4. pilotrtc macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    #4
    Please excuse my ignorance, but which do you (the OP) think is best? I am not familiar with the movie and, if I was, I'm not sure if I would know the look that was intended by the movie makers.
     
  5. XboxMySocks thread starter macrumors 68020

    XboxMySocks

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    #5
    I honestly think the Blu-Ray in this case is incredibly better. That being said, if you don't feel like spending $99 on a Blu-Ray player then the difference is honestly negligible. But the difference is still there, and very nice to have if you can. I still wouldn't buy a Blu-Ray player if you don't already own one, the difference is nice to have but tbh not worth buying another standalone unit to clog up your entertainment centres. If you have one, obviously Blu-Ray is a nicer choice, however.
     
  6. BittenApple macrumors 6502a

    BittenApple

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    #6
    Just looking at the specs, Blu-Ray is way better...
     
  7. FSMBP macrumors 68020

    FSMBP

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    #7
    I don't know if it has to do with Blu-Ray but HD movie in general will look better than SD (DVD quality) movies.

    I do think Blu-Ray is great but it's like "I have to buy all my movies over to again on Blu-Ray to get the highest quality" mentality. I mean, from VHS to DVD, you really got a huge different; the video quality was twice as sharp, audio was a huge improvement and interactive menus/deleted scenes/bloopers/commentaries.

    Now, from DVD to Blu-Ray its picture quality, and better menus. It's why SACD and DVD-Audio never took off, a little bit too late.

    I personally I prefer physical media to downloads but I'm fine with DVD quality at the moment - plus HBO, Showtime, Cinemax, TBS, USA offer movies in HD.

    But yeah, I do like the OPs screenshots - you can really see a huge difference in quality (I didn't notice it that dramatically before).
     
  8. XboxMySocks thread starter macrumors 68020

    XboxMySocks

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    #8
    This is fairly obvious ;)

    I agree. This is stupid. I would not go back and re-buy anything. However, with recent releases like Saw 6, I most certainly would buy Blu-Ray over SD-DVD now.

    I honestly didn't think there was much of a difference either. But when I decided to do a comparison I realised there actually really was.
     
  9. senseless macrumors 68000

    senseless

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, USA
    #9
    Nothing beats the transition from Black and White to Color.
     
  10. DoFoT9 macrumors P6

    DoFoT9

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Location:
    Singapore
    #10
    you cant be serious.

    those images are compressed and undersized! how could you possibly compare them? the differences are outrageously obvious - i just thought id catch you on your errors ;)
     
  11. neonkru macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    #11
    everyone knows bluray is far the best format right now
     
  12. DoFoT9 macrumors P6

    DoFoT9

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Location:
    Singapore
    #12
    nu-uh! :eek: super-hi res is! :p
     
  13. XboxMySocks thread starter macrumors 68020

    XboxMySocks

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    #13
    I suppose I could fetch you an unfettered screenshot from DVD, but ATM, I'd have no way of getting a 'pure' Blu-Ray shot — Mac's don't support BR atm.
     
  14. neonkru macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    #14
    just compare an original dvd movie against a 8gb blu ray rip movie. bluray wins. however with the lower prices of dvds right now i still buy some dvd movies. they're so cheap that you feel you are paying almost nothing for it. however in bluray i haven't purchased a single one and won't for a long time.
     
  15. DoFoT9 macrumors P6

    DoFoT9

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Location:
    Singapore
    #15
    BR drive + makemkv. play with VLC, screen capture.

    :rolleyes:

    neonkru havent u heard of a video store + makemkv ;)
     
  16. DoFoT9 macrumors P6

    DoFoT9

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Location:
    Singapore
    #16
    but before you said you dont give a ****, which you clearly do because you have already put in the time/effort to go any buy one. :D :confused:

    im still wondering why your pictures look so terrible. even your DVD image looks bad. hardly a comparison at all.
     
  17. XboxMySocks thread starter macrumors 68020

    XboxMySocks

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    #17
    Yeah, the dvd doesn't look too stellar :/
     
  18. sammich macrumors 601

    sammich

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Location:
    Sarcasmville.
    #18
    My first 'my god Blu-ray is beautiful' moment is when I watched Casino Royale and the first shot of the Aston Martin DB9 comes in.

    So beautiful.
     
  19. DoFoT9 macrumors P6

    DoFoT9

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Location:
    Singapore
    #19
    neither do lol.

    *drools*

    my first was a scene in transformers. the picture looks great whilst moving, but dont pause it otherwise you will be turned off!
     
  20. MisterMe macrumors G4

    MisterMe

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2002
    Location:
    USA
    #20
    I cannot agree more. The second image (supposedly from the DVD) has better contrast and color than the first (supposedly from the Blu-ray).

    This has to be one of the dumbest threads that I have seen in a while. Blu-ray records and plays content in 1080p. It pushes the limits of the HDTV standard. DVD records and displays content in 480p. It was designed to get the most out of CRT-based standard-definition TV sets. The notion Blu-ray displays a better image than DVD is shocking! Dare I say "heresy"? What next? Next, I suppose that the OP will try to convince us that genuine champagne tastes better than Diet Sprite. And he will do it be showing us pictures of glasses filled with each beverage taken in a dark room.
     
  21. XboxMySocks thread starter macrumors 68020

    XboxMySocks

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    #21
    Wheeee, l2troll
     
  22. MrSEC macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2008
    #22
    OP I was one of those guys who was very late to the game even going from VHS to DVD (I'm talking 2003!)and I was blown away at the difference.....imagine that! Anyway, I appreciate the pics,and I do find BR is better looking when I played a movie in it that came with the PS3.The only "problem" I have is I have my surround sound hooked up to my DVD player,so when I play a movie on the PS3 I can hardly hear it.I think I'm going to get a stand alone BR player and go ahead and make the switch.Has the price of BR movies come down any?
     
  23. DoFoT9 macrumors P6

    DoFoT9

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Location:
    Singapore
    #23
    Do you not find those pics completely fake? They hardly look like the real deal at all.

    can you not use your ps3 as a dvd player as well and hook the surround sound directly into that?

    they have come down quite considerably. over here in australia (where everything is immensely expensive), BR new releases are identical to dvd new releases! Its amasing. You can find older movies for $19aus each, and newer ones go for around $30. They used to be $50 not 6 months ago!
     
  24. XboxMySocks thread starter macrumors 68020

    XboxMySocks

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    #24
    yes because I routinely upload fake pics about comparisons of bluray to dvd to websites even though the process would be ****ing pointless but hey im just a mindless troll what else do i have better to do
     

Share This Page