Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
the recent resurgence in 80's-inspired music
- Thread starter sundog925
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Not gonna lie the 80's did have pretty good shows. I'm a vintage TV buff for sure, I watch a lot of old shows.You missed a lot of good TV shows.
Well the music from the 80's never went anywhere.
Yeah, I listen to that. I'm talking about new stuff.
Most of the new stuff is crap.Yeah, I listen to that. I'm talking about new stuff.
/off my lawn.
Don't know if you were here at the time, because then you would have loved the station before it that was a complete 80s format. It was one of the more popular stations (in listenership) before it got changed to very moldy oldies, then which became the station you're talking about now.
The 80s station in Las Vegas at the time had it best, IMHO. They were not only able to secure the deal that brought them back to the 80s format, but got moved to a frequency that had a 5-year boost in range, so you could hear the station clearly on the east side of the Grand Canyon.. so roughly a 100 mile range in each direction.
Back to the topic, though.. of course this is having a huge resurgence, because those of us who lived through it as kids are now parents and kids of our own, and since we only know what we've lived through, you're seeing all of us listening to what we grew up with or were influenced by. That right now would be 70s/80s.
It was only 20 years ago when the 80s were maligned and lamentable. Now, it's the 90s and 2000s that are maligned. in 10 - 15 years time, those are going to make a comeback (though I wish wouldn't; music in those decades (read: 1992 forward) were absolutely horrible).
BL.
I always wonder how far Nirvana would have lasted had Kurt lived. Pearl Jam and STP shifted their sound. Would Nirvana have stayed relevant.
Yes, it was the only way to get him from out behind the drums and become the front-man for a, IMHO, mediocre "Alt-Pop-Rock" band catering to people who are not music aficionados, and appreciate lukewarm rock.
Many of the the very best bands ever only had 3-4 albums, including Nirvana. They could have called it quits in 1994, whether Kurt was living or not, and still been one of the best rock bands ever...far, far better than the Foo Fighters.
I like the Foo Fighters, probably the best rock band out there today. Now maybe that says something for todays rock bands. But I really think Dave is an epic showman.
I was born 1980, so I grew up as an 80's kid. But during that time, I was NOT into music. Yeah, I was into songs from Michael Jackson, Madonna, and Cyndi Lauper, etc when I heard them on the radio but I was NOT into music that much. I started getting more into music by 1990 when the Jukebox (aka The Box) was on cable and MC Hammer and Vanilla Ice were all the rage. That's when my taste was expanding more into hip hop or obscure artists.
Now at 34 going to turn 35 in December, I can easily say the 80's had the best pop music. It definitely is the catchiest and I have music dating back to the 1940's. I love NEW WAVE. I also love IRON MAIDEN. Heavy metal can be relaxing like classical since the real star of the songs is the electric guitar riffs. Metallica was actually the best during that decade too. It is why I enjoy movies like Romy & Michele's High School Reunion because of its 80's pop soundtrack. Alot of Family Guy episodes I like because they throw in an 80's pop song.
I think the next catchiest decade was the 1960's! Only 2.5-3 min songs but extremely catchy. And not all of them were from The Beatles, The Beach Boys, or The Monkees. I rank it 80's, 60's, 70's, 90's, 00's, and 10's. I did a playlist of 80's and 90's songs and my 80's songs needed another playlist.
The best year in music for me was in 1992 thanks to Nirvana and Dr. Dre. But 80's was better overall in music and has higher replay value for me. I still shake my shoulders everytime I hear Sly Fox's "Let's Go All The Way." I say 80's was better in music, cartoons, toys, and sitcoms. I never got into Seinfeld or Friends. But in movies and video games, the 90's was superior than the 80's. The 90's lacked the fashion and personality of the 80's but during the dawn of CG effects and 3D graphics, 90's was more enjoyable in those two mediums. The year of 1994 has alot of my favorite movies. And video games peaked for me 4th - 6th (SNES, PS1, PS2) eras when going into the arcades during the 90's was still fun and we had real friends to do multi-player N64 stuff. Pre-online times.
I rather have the hardware capabilities of now but I still do like the media content from the previous century since this is only a decade and half young and it all depends on the eras we grew up on.
Now at 34 going to turn 35 in December, I can easily say the 80's had the best pop music. It definitely is the catchiest and I have music dating back to the 1940's. I love NEW WAVE. I also love IRON MAIDEN. Heavy metal can be relaxing like classical since the real star of the songs is the electric guitar riffs. Metallica was actually the best during that decade too. It is why I enjoy movies like Romy & Michele's High School Reunion because of its 80's pop soundtrack. Alot of Family Guy episodes I like because they throw in an 80's pop song.
I think the next catchiest decade was the 1960's! Only 2.5-3 min songs but extremely catchy. And not all of them were from The Beatles, The Beach Boys, or The Monkees. I rank it 80's, 60's, 70's, 90's, 00's, and 10's. I did a playlist of 80's and 90's songs and my 80's songs needed another playlist.
The best year in music for me was in 1992 thanks to Nirvana and Dr. Dre. But 80's was better overall in music and has higher replay value for me. I still shake my shoulders everytime I hear Sly Fox's "Let's Go All The Way." I say 80's was better in music, cartoons, toys, and sitcoms. I never got into Seinfeld or Friends. But in movies and video games, the 90's was superior than the 80's. The 90's lacked the fashion and personality of the 80's but during the dawn of CG effects and 3D graphics, 90's was more enjoyable in those two mediums. The year of 1994 has alot of my favorite movies. And video games peaked for me 4th - 6th (SNES, PS1, PS2) eras when going into the arcades during the 90's was still fun and we had real friends to do multi-player N64 stuff. Pre-online times.
I rather have the hardware capabilities of now but I still do like the media content from the previous century since this is only a decade and half young and it all depends on the eras we grew up on.
You ever heard the saying, "when adults are speaking"?
Add to that Mark Ronson - Uptown Funk ft. Bruno Mars. You'd almost swear it was a Morris Day, or Cameo joint. Though I'm more of a Depeche Mode type of person.
Last edited:
Uptown Funk definitely threw me off the first time I heard it. It sounds like something from a different time. But it came off as more 70's to me than 80's.
Well, having lived through it, I must rather liked some of the fashion, especially the clothing that was loose, easy and comfortable to wear. Personally, I loathe this 'fitted' or 'tailored' look that is so unfortunately prevalent nowadays.
And, as for shoulder pads, a bit like Karl Marx, I must admit that I rather like the theory but will concede that occasionally, the practice left much to be desired.
However, some of the music was sublime.
I feel like the normal 20-30 year circle of nostalgia started flattening out in the early 2000s. We've been kind of in this pop cultural "long now" ever since. Again, I think it's totally fine, as there are a lot of bits of music and fashion I love extending well back into the 1960s.
Or maybe I'm just older and don't care as much about what's currently in or out of fashion from the past. And I'm still very interested in new music.
Or maybe I'm just older and don't care as much about what's currently in or out of fashion from the past. And I'm still very interested in new music.
I hate to break this to you, but the 80's "fashions" are back. Such as the colored plastic sunglasses.
They were and are relevant to anyone who loved what was somewhat inadequately called the "Grunge era". I was a teenager in the 90s and not much of a fan of Pop music or RnB. So yeah, I listened to a lot of "Grunge" as it were, the main band (to this day) being Pearl Jam, but liked Nirvana too, and the Foo Fighters, Alice in Chains, Soundgarden (not really Grunge), Mudhoney, The Stone Temple Pilots, and so on. Of course they were very relevant to many of us for a variety of reasons and, in no small amount due to these bands making some highly intense music.
PS: As to not derail the thread, I do like some of the 80s and early 90s synth-pop stuff, mainly Erasure, Depeche Mode, Bronski Beat and a few others.
Last edited:
That debate is long settled. Nirvana is the most significant rock band of the 90's. They basically killed off 80's rock completely with one album.
Though I don't think Grunge has the staying nostalgia power of 80's rock. Mötley Crüe is doing a final tour and still packing in stadiums. Def Leppard still sells out stadiums. Bon Jovi can do arenas to this day.
Alice in Chains and Pearl Jam on the other hand are doing tiny venues in comparison. No one is lining up to recapture the feelings of Grunge.
3 things killed 80s rock, to a point:
- Every record label had to have their hair band, which saturated the music scene.
- Beavis and Butthead.
- Nirvana, and Metallica's video where they used Kip Winger's headshot as a dartboard.
And that's the 'to the point' part I'm alluding to. Grunge also made people realize that it took more than 3 chords to make a band, and Beavis and Butthead (MTV for the most) even killed that. Everyone realized back in 1994 that they missed that type of music, and it started with Journey coming back and making an album (their last with Steve Perry).
Winger just released another album, and they still sound as good as tight as they did back then. Whitesnake is still selling out stadiums. Those 80s acts have a good thing going now, where they don't have to support an album by going on tour; they'll get 2 - 3 albums on the bill, do a tour, and support the tour by releasing an album.
Or, if they are good enough, they'll book out the Hard Rock Hotel/Casino in Vegas and do a 150 night show, where they'll perform their biggest selling album in its entirety. Def Leppard just did that. Motley Crue just did that. Journey did that.
80s music has made such a huge comeback that the anthems from it keep it from becoming stale; Grunge doesn't have anything similar.
BL.
Post grunge had a strong run after Kurt committed suicide. I'm more a rock person, and don't recall anyone clamoring for 80's in the mid-late 90's. Brit Pop like Oasis and Stone Roses were going strong. In addition to bands like Garbage and Bush. On the USA side we had NIN, Stone Temple Pilots, Marilyn Manson Green Day, Foo Fighters, Lenny Kravitz and Incubus.
Like literally, I don't know anyone that was looking back to the 80's at that time. There was some Duran Duran, U2, and Depeche Mode love, but that's about it.
But we agree. Grunge is a blip and probably will never see a big revival, especially with Kurt dead. People just aren't looking to relive that point in life, and the sounds are incredibly dated.
And leave Beavis and Butthead alone
For the record, I consider the end of the 80s to be late 1992, when grunge completely took over.
Crowded House was huge during then. Thompson Twins continued as a duo and was still big. Don even put out 3 albums that were big then. Yes, bands were a lot more scarce, but they took the hint from those back then that were tired of hearing crap like Oasis.
But we agree. Grunge is a blip and probably will never see a big revival, especially with Kurt dead. People just aren't looking to relive that point in life, and the sounds are incredibly dated.
And leave Beavis and Butthead alone
Beavis and Butthead were basically the 90s version of Simon Cowell. IF a band or group came out, and they said that they sucked, your career tanked. If they said you were cool, your band did great (at least during the duration of that genre of music). They called Smashing Pumpkins, Green Day, Weezer, and Alice in Chains right; and numerous other bands wrong, which they either rightfully sucked, or missed their significance completely, though those bands never recovered from their snubbing.
BL.
Post grunge had a strong run after Kurt committed suicide. I'm more a rock person, and don't recall anyone clamoring for 80's in the mid-late 90's. Brit Pop like Oasis and Stone Roses were going strong. In addition to bands like Garbage and Bush. On the USA side we had NIN, Stone Temple Pilots, Marilyn Manson Green Day, Foo Fighters, Lenny Kravitz and Incubus.
Like literally, I don't know anyone that was looking back to the 80's at that time. There was some Duran Duran, U2, and Depeche Mode love, but that's about it.
But we agree. Grunge is a blip and probably will never see a big revival, especially with Kurt dead. People just aren't looking to relive that point in life, and the sounds are incredibly dated.
And leave Beavis and Butthead alone
I remember that vividly. Every little 4th and 5th grader running around with a black armband on. It was ludicrous bordering on the absurd.
As for grunge being "music", it was various people screaming and mumbling into a microphone; the "lyrics" were totally unintelligible. Grunge really was nothing more than proto-emo (or as it's better known: scream-o).