Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is this wording significant?
the OP said:
...On all five measures, homosexual men reported larger penises than did heterosexual men. Explanations for these differences are discussed​
...including perhaps a greater emphasis on penile size as a perceived measure of desirability? ;)
 
Is this wording significant?
...including perhaps a greater emphasis on penile size as a perceived measure of desirability? ;)

I noticed that too, but I can hardly see why either orientation would have more incentive to emphasize.
 
Speaking of public transportation, I think we all know the guy who sits in the seat with his legs far apart, as if to discourage anyone from sitting next to him. One day, "that guy" was doing this on the train when I was in just the wrong mood. I squeezed into the seat next to him since it was the only seat left. He refused to close his legs, at which point I said, "Close your legs. It's not that f***ing big!" He looked at me with horror as if to say, "I just pissed off this really big, scary-looking guy and he also figured out I have a small dick." Needless to say, I doubt he ever did it again to anyone else. ;) Sometimes people just need to be told.

Good for you! And you're right, sometimes they just need to be told. If they behave like idiots, just let them know.
 
So the bigger you are the more likely you are to be homosexual? I don't buy it. Anyone want to come over say around 3 and prove me wrong? :D

Oh baby! You're asking for this one. I'll take that offer, and I'll loose can we say um ... make it Mo' Better ;) ?!

jk. but if you're hot can I get a photo?

PS: I don't buy it either. IF it's the majority that it is true, good for them ~ maybe they face the same shock & denial of service as I did when I was in high school. Now I'm average and proud of my size and performance. This article has nothing on me.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.