Nope. If you remember (or if I do) come back and requote this when they do the refresh. They absolutely will not add a port to the Macbook.
They added a port to the MBA.
Nope. If you remember (or if I do) come back and requote this when they do the refresh. They absolutely will not add a port to the Macbook.
It's not a flaw. It's a philosophy and design choice. If you need ports, this isn't the right computer for you. There are others.
They added a port to the MBA.
Really don't think they will. The MBA example is easy to bring up as a knee-jerk but the situations could not be more different. On the old MBA, one port of only USB 2.0 (!) which already then was slow and not dependable for certain things was already a standard getting long in the tooth. So it doesn't take a genius to see that only one of these ports was going to be a pretty nasty bottleneck for users, even using the best hubs they could find.
USB C is a totally, totally different game. Brand spanking new, very fast, extremely flexible, allows for channels of very significant electrical power for devices, _and_ it's only just at the very beginning of its development cycle. It has way more promise than a backward-thinking single USB 2.0 port ever had, so it's far less likely that there's a serious error to correct here. It will all depend on how well people take to it, how quickly the market brings products to it, and how much the hub market takes off.
Apple has been wrong about design before.... Many times actually, and adjusted accordingly
Correction. I need ports, and this is the right computer for me.
With it's three-port HDMI adapter, the Retina has all the connectivity it needs. Apple just gives its owners the option of leaving the ports in the office when not needed. On the road, no one needs monitors, keyboards, external drives, thumb drives, wired mice, or any other peripheral. Better to take the ports off and have the world's thinnest notebook rather than leave them on and create something more pedestrian.
When I take a two-day business trip, I don't need the port adapter at all. And frankly, with the tremendous battery life I've even been known to leave the power brick at home too.
BJ
They added a port to the MBA.
Yeah they have for sure. But not in this case. At least in my opinion. Wires are ugly and annoying. Wireless is the way to go.
Wireless is the future, but simple act of not being able to charge and plug in another item (like a camera) isn't the way to go
If it had two USB-C ports, was 14", 16GB RAM, more power under the hood, it would be the perfect laptop
The "knee-jerk" reaction was only stated as fact- they did add the port, and I do suspect they will do same on next revision of this machine. Not everyone likes spaghetti while working with it.
Wireless is the future, but simple act of not being able to charge and plug in another item (like a camera) isn't the way to go
If it had two USB-C ports, was 14", 16GB RAM, more power under the hood, it would be the perfect laptop
Weren't you the one posting all the negativity?
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/new-macbook-or-11-6-mba.1902900/#post-21628213
Get a Macbook Pro then? Kinda seems like that's what you're looking for. I don't think the Macbook was made for a user like you in mind.
And just plug your other item into the wall outlet. I don't see what the problem is. Once you start plugging and charging devices from your laptop, it defeats the purpose of having a thin and light computer. You're just cluttering it up!
95% people who use MacBooks will just browse safari, use a word processor, load simples apps like iTunes or spotify.
Do you have a source for that statistic for did you make it up? My guess is the latter.
I've done research
So that is a no. We can call it what it is, a made up statistic that is not true.
What do you think most people are doing on laptops? Editing video and programming?
It doesn't matter what I think. What matters is that I am not the one making up statistics and trying to pass them off as fact.
Apple obviously has more knowledge then you and I on laptop usage, hence the release of the MacBook
But go ahead and tell me how you know more
I will be getting a MacBook Pro in the next few days, either a 13" or 15"
I'm just pointing out what I feel are glaring flaws in the MacBook, in a few years it will be the de facto laptop
Just get bothBit of a difference in speed. 2015 15" 16/512 v 12" 1.2/512.
Well, the industry may not have followed them in terms of their chosen ports, but they certainly followed Apple in several different ways:It is a typical Apple flaw. Releasing hardware tech way before its time followed by minimal acceptance of the tech industry wide. You might argue that Apple is blazing the way, but I say they are more blazing a trail of your dollars into their pockets. Dongles are a selling philosophy, and not a technical innovation.
When has Apple found industry acceptance doing this? Was Firewire accepted...no, was thunderbolt accepted...no, perhaps USB-c will be accepted but not in its present incarnation. By acceptance, I mean as prevalent as say USB 2.x or USB 3.x.
I get Macs and PCs are different, but ports are meant to be universal and not proprietary.
In terms of the rMB, I agree with most here that more ports are not needed however a second USB-C port would not have compromised the design nor cost much of anything for Apple to do. This I consider a design flaw. You'll see it next year on the new rMB.
I doubt you will see the rMB design be much different with respect to ports. Perhaps it will simply be merged into the AIR line where a slightly thicker body design is available.
Perfect for you maybe. For many of us who do own the rMB now, 16GB is completely unnecessary. Furthermore, the highest end rMBP is only 16GB and even the MBA, which has more power under the hood, maxes out with 8GB. Unless they decide to start releasing the rMBP with 32GB RAM options, I doubt we'll see anything more than 8GB in the rMB. My personal opinion and for those that want 16GB, I'd be quite happy if I was wrong.Wireless is the future, but simple act of not being able to charge and plug in another item (like a camera) isn't the way to go
If it had two USB-C ports, was 14", 16GB RAM, more power under the hood, it would be the perfect laptop
Wireless is the future, but simple act of not being able to charge and plug in another item (like a camera) isn't the way to go
Also, how does adding ports make for any less spaghetti? Thinking back, I actually would have _way_ preferred it to have one sleek little cable running out of it to some unseen hub from which all the devices would be hooked up, rather than different kinds of cables poking out of it from all sides. Also at the end of the day's work, it was so messy to disconnect everything separately so as to be able to go home with the laptop