I didn't say it was an evil conspiracy ... more like a business blunder that is costing Apple and its shareholders lots of profits, angering customers and driving them away, etc.
Again, where is your hard data that shows this? For having such an angry user base, they sure seem to still be handing Apple fistfulls of cash... and this bears repeating...
including you.
I wouldn't have said any of this a year ago, because Lightning had just come out, and nobody knew how it was going to do yet. For all we knew, by Christmas there'd be Lightning versions of all the major accessories. However a year's time affords us a little bit of perspective. Now we can see, even still, the number of Lightning-specific accessories is quite limited.
... for
your specific, niche application. For the vast majority of individuals however, their universe is quite different from yours, and the number of accessories that are lightning interface compatible is
actually quite plentiful.
It doesn't look good honestly. I'm just making an observation.
You're perfectly entitled to that observation, however it seems self-evident that outside of your extremely limited paradigm, that observation happens to be incorrect.
Apple really wants to force the issue of Lightning, just like it wants to force the issue of Thunderbolt with the new Pro.
Straw man argument, and not a very good one as straw men go. Thunderbolt is not an Apple-specific interface. It's a cross-platform standard. There's
a growing list of laptops, desktops, motherboards, storage devices and other peripherals that support the interface, of which Apple is very much in the minority on the list.
So, we can toss this out as a valid comparison. Apple
may have been the first to implement Thunderbolt, and even that could be debated, but they most definitely are not the last.
Maybe this was a calculated move and Apple thought this change in connectors had to be made eventually, and it may hurt for a couple of years, but after that it would be fine. It's not going to have killed Apple, and now they can make things that are thinner. Because y'know, thinness is the most important thing evar!
Thinness is a good thing, but so is abstraction of the interface. It's arguably possible to
add connectors to the interface without forcing the hardware to have a chip on board to handle outputs to that new interface. So, not only is it thinner, but people who would never use a VGA video out won't have to have larger, heavier, possibly more expensive device in order to have the chip on board. Same goes for HDMI, or some other application that hasn't been thought of yet, but for which the interface can be programmed through software, and made to work through external hardware.
No I'm coming out with a phone that will require me to take an adapter everywhere, or, not upgrade my phone, which is ridiculous.
Fortunately,
you don't have to. You can return your phone, and get a refund. You can continue using your old phone. Or you can do what you should be doing if you object this strongly to what Apple has done, and give your money to another phone manufacturer.
I didn't get on board with Apple so I could get stuck on an old phone because they refuse to make new devices with the standard port they themselves invented!
Really? Are you
truly missing the irony in that statement? You're composing a manifesto about how Apple shouldn't ditch a connector simply because it's old, and yet you're having a stompy fit because you don't want to use an "old" model of phone?
I'm done. There's no reasoning with you, and it's evident that there will be no satisfactory solution for you. Best of luck!