Originally posted by joey j
>You said the Motorola did well with the G4,
And they did. Whether or not their foundries can cope is a completely
unrelated matter.
> and you said that the 7450 scaled reasonably. Which ofcourse it hasnt.
(isn't it odd that you can't dig up where I said that? maybe because I didn't?)
I never asserted that anywhere; no amount of smoke-blowing will change
that fact. However, I did explain multiple times the difference between
Motorola's foundries, which haven't been able to produce higher-frequency
G4s in volume, which is completely separate to the G4's design, which is
an elegant 32-bit load/store microprocessor. Why you can't tell the
difference between the two is astounding.
>Find the quotes yourself. Its an interesting quest of yours joey, finding
out your own ignorance.
I hardly think you've a leg to stand on. Do you remember the discussion of
the FX being able to use a 400 mhz FSB? And then me pointing you toward
articles at IBM's website which all specified 200 Mhz as the FSB
frequency? Care to explain your way around that one?
> you obviously havnt read your own threads before have you?
Oh dear, spikey, I wouldn't be saying that if I were you. Remember how you
called me "a f***ing canadian" when I had already said that I wasn't
Canadian?
https://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php3?threadid=593&pagenumber=2
Search for "just above".
In any case, are the 7460's "out of the window" (same discussion, page 1,
search for "apollo is out of the window") despite the article's "offering
7460 ... in two configurations"? How could you possibly make a slip like
that if you had read the article?
I said your
So you still say motorola has doen well for apple with the G4?
even though they got stuck at 500mhz for a year?
even though they have only moved to 867mhz in nearly a year?
dont you think fabrication is part of what determines whether they are good or not?
Its not design of the cpu that matters, its how far you can travel with it compared to the competition, thanks to the G4 apple have fallen behind, not even you can argue with that.
Isnt it convenient you keep asking me to dig up info on what blunders you have made? just so i give up out of sheer boredom with you and this subject. Just so you can satisfy yourself with the delusion that you won the argument.
you did assert it, you want to see it then you find it. aLthough you are right, someone else has to prove your ignorance to you. Get a shrink, they get paid to do that s***.
This argument isnt about me having a leg to stand on, i based that assumption on a rumor and not the source you chose to use, i mentioned that fact, i admitted it, and so i was cpmpletely correct in what i was saying, hahahahahahahaha joey read what i say next time.
Good luck on that quest by the way.
I honestly dont care if you are canadian or not, your still a jerk. not reading your threads is one thing but YOU not reading reading your own threads is another.
Well done joey, one step closer to your ignorance, im with you all the way man hehehe.
a slip like that???
That was a comment on writing style, not content of the guys article. Another case of you making me repeat myself joey, i have said this before, hahaha you need more tricks.
that so called slip had no relevance to what i was saying in my last thread. another case of taking quote out of context joey, try again, better luck next time.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA joey you are one dumb ba*****. you think people havent noticed your tricks, this isnt flaming this is pathetic, your not proving anything because i have defended my case succesfully before.
Unlucky joey, why dont you go away and learn some new tricks. And maybe you could come back again as john123?
