Well, Apple won't be able to stay in business without generating revenue for its major competitor, Samsung. The more Apple sells, the more money Samsung makes, before the actual sale of the Apple device. So, Apple's continued existence is beneficial for Samsung.Apple plans to upgrade the iPad mini, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, iMac, and MacBook Air with OLED displays between 2026 and 2028, according to DigiTimes.
OLEDs have very high contrast, but the overall brightness tends to be lower in comparison to high-end LED displays. Running your OLED display at peak brightness for long periods of time will also wear it down pretty quickly. This might not be an issue for TVs which tend to be used for a couple of hours in the evening.What are you talking about I just got a oled tv it’s a million times brighter then my former lcd also oled has way better viewing angles.
The problem with larger OLED screens is they would need to be 5K or higher. I haven't seen a 5K OLED screen yet. Even a 24" iMac (currently is 4.5K) would take a special OLED to meet the same specs.A future iMac 🖥️ with an OLED screen larger than the current 24” would be great!
Bring back the 27” or make it 30”!
The iPad mini 7 was released in 2024, two years ago. The jump from 6 to 7 is substantial, you get 50% more ram and the base storage doubles from 64 gb to 128 gb. Wait for a sale and trade in your iPad mini 6 to Best Buy and the difference to upgrade might around 200 for a new machine. Remember release dates change, who knows if the iPad mini 8 is actually released this year or pushed back to next year.The iPad mini update timelines suck! Sick of it! I will not buy an iPad Mini 7 to upgrade my 6.
Agreed. For a company that purports to care about accessibility and health, this march toward OLED has been an insult on those of us who can’t use them.Not good news for those sensitive to PWM on OLED displays, unless Apple start making a better effort with DC-like dimming like some of the Chinese smartphone manufacturers are doing - and no, the new PWM option on the iPhone 17 is not good enough for many people, I had to give my 17 Pro away to a family member due to the eye strain and migraines it caused.
It’s a fact that oled uses less battery, I had a launch day iPhone X that I gave to my mom who then gave to my dad who only recently updated. No issues with the screen. It’s not 2010, oled is a mature technology nowPeople upgrade phones more frequently than they upgrade laptops and one of the major reasons people upgrade a phone is battery life. With OLED screens becoming significantly dimmer over time compared to LCD, people push the brightness higher in dimmer rooms to compensate which drains the battery. So a 'display issue' presents as a battery life issue - and then people upgrade.
People typically use laptops for 5+ years. I still use a 2017 MBP without issues. The screen is likely dimmer than when I first purchased it, but any brightness drop is barely noticable. I've seen a few people replace OLED televisions in the same time period though.
OLEDs have a brightness issue compared to LCDs. That's not an opinion, it's just a fact.
If the rest of the ageing device can function to your requirements, what advantage does an OLED screen provide if it's just going to need replacement or forces an expensive upgrade sooner than you would get with the current screens?
Lots of people buy the iPad Pro. There is no reason to put down the device or the people buying.
So are you proposing that Apple stay with lcd to support the minority of folks with sensitivities?Agreed. For a company that purports to care about accessibility and health, this march toward OLED has been an insult on those of us who can’t use them.
So, what. Not everybody wants a Mac or they prefer the form factor of the iPad, as well as the OS.You can get a macbook for the same price that has 100x the functionality.
The iPad Pro with tandem OLED does not have any trouble with brightness. I only run it around 60% brightness most of the time anyway. The double layers of that type of screen mean that each OLED emitter is only running at about half the power level to produce the same brightness level. That should mean a much slower degradation which increases non-linearly with power levels. It also means that burn-in is much less likely. All of the Apple OLED rumors involve tandem OLEDs like this.And they also have a major problem with achieving brightness - particularly as the screens age. Pumping more power through OLEDS makes them degrade faster, because they're organic.
My current laptop is a 2017 MBP. It gets just as bright as a brand new MBP, despite having many hours of daily use for almost 9 years. I've yet to see an OLED display achieve that on any device.
Where did OP put iPP or its buyers down? If anything, mini is being put down, highlighting a limitation.Lots of people buy the iPad Pro. There is no reason to put down the device or the people buying.
The year of accessories! Until the products are released, I wouldn’t be concerned.So 2026 is a bad year for buying Apple devices with a screen. Noted.
The person being replied to had tried to imply that only 12 people were buying iPad Pros. It was a minor, and clearly untrue, cut. Best ignored at this point.Where did OP put iPP or its buyers down? If anything, mini is being put down, highlighting a limitation.
Yep, you would be surprised from comments on MR how many people do not actually understand what Tandem OLED is.The iPad Pro with tandem OLED does not have any trouble with brightness. I only run it around 60% brightness most of the time anyway. The double layers of that type of screen mean that each OLED emitter is only running at about half the power level to produce the same brightness level. That should mean a much slower degradation which increases non-linearly with power levels. It also means that burn-in is much less likely. All of the Apple OLED rumors involve tandem OLEDs like this.