Sorry, friend, but as someone with a lot of experience with Android devices and a great deal of respect for the OS, I have to say that you're coming off as some kind of Apple fanboy parody of an Android advocate.
For some users a Samsung Galaxy Tab may be a better choice. It's certainly a better choice for those who want to tinker with their tablet, just as Android phones provide a better environment for such folks than the iPhone. It is demonstrably not a better choice for the vast majority of consumers who are less interested in hardware specs and customizing their user interface than in the vastly greater set of apps available for the iPad.
The Galaxy does have a slightly larger screen. Unfortunately, that advantage in watching films is balanced by the fact that the larger screen only emphasizes that most of the apps available for the Galaxy are designed for a much smaller screen.
The Galaxy is slightly more than 1 ounce (1.25 vs 1.33 lbs) lighter than the iPad. Unfortunately, in the real world that's not much of a difference and is balanced by the fact that the slightly smaller form factor of the iPad makes it easier to hold for those for whom the weight difference is likely to matter.
Whether the Tegra 2 is a "more powerful processor" than the A5 is arguable. Suffice to say that what matters to a user is consistent performance. And on that score, the iPad is significantly superior to Android devices. (That's due in part to the more comprehensive multitasking provided by Android. Apple intentionally limited that capability in order to assure consistent performance and eliminate lag.)
Finally, the claim that the Galaxy has "better battery life" is simply untrue. Since you seem to believe that Democrats are sources of misinformation, perhaps you'll believe the word of the Wall Street Journal.
"...the most notable difference between these two tablets is in battery life: In my test with WiFi on, screen brightness at about 75% and a continuous loop of video playing, the Galaxy Tab 10.1 lasted for just 5 hours and 38 minutes. This is only a bit more than half as long as the iPad 2, which lasted for 10 hours and nine minutes in the same test..."
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303848104576385633609398422.html
P.S. I realize this response is way off-topic for this thread. And I hesitated to add these comments for that reason. However, since the poster insisted on dragging the thread down this road, it seemed appropriate to respond directly to his comments. I don't have any interest in debating the points above in this thread, so I'll leave it at that.