Thunderbolt 3 to Thunderbolt 2 Cables

Discussion in 'Mac Pro' started by nerdynerdynerdy, May 5, 2016.

  1. nerdynerdynerdy macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2007
    #1
  2. SoyCapitanSoyCapitan macrumors 68040

    SoyCapitanSoyCapitan

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2015
    #2
    Some cables have chippery in the connector. They are active and not passive, this adds to cost. Converting the signal processing will also be costly.
     
  3. nerdynerdynerdy thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2007
    #3
    So a regular thunderbolt cable has chips in it? I didn't know that. You wouldn't know to look at it.

    But this thing looks bizarre:

    [​IMG]

    I'm planning to transition my whole edit/composite system from my old fashioned Mac Pro tower to a new style Mac Pro, but most of the external peripherals I'll also be upgrading come with thunderbolt 2 at this stage.

    Hopefully Apple will release a more attractive solution.
     
  4. SoyCapitanSoyCapitan macrumors 68040

    SoyCapitanSoyCapitan

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2015
    #4
    This is the internal of a Thunderbolt 1/2 connector

    http://dharmdutt.com/wp-content/gallery/thunderbolt-technology/CableThunderbolt3_ifixit.jpg

    So to use it with a Thunderbolt 3 Adapter some kind of signal conversion would be needed so that the host OS can initialise the device properly. The signals coming in from the Display Port pins need to be remapped to the new USB C style connector.
     
  5. nerdynerdynerdy thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2007
    #5
    Sure, but that thing I posted is the size of an Apple Watch. Seems weird to me, but I'm not a tech person so what do I know.
     
  6. fuchsdh macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2014
    #6
    That's really the size of a lot of active adapters. It's a shame, but there it is.

    Wouldn't be surprised if there's a bit of a transitional period where we still have legacy USB-A ports and TB2 in addition to TB3. Not sure if Apple's aiming for an ultimate goal of *no* USB-C ports and just have everything be a super capable TB3.
     
  7. Stacc macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    #7
    Yeah its too bad they couldn't do thunderbolt 3 to thunderbolt 2 with a passive adapter. It wouldn't surprise me to see thunderbolt 2 show up in addition to TB 3 on a revised mac pro. Given the limited PCIe bandwidth of Xeon CPUs it may not even be feasible for 3 thunderbolt 3 controllers. My guess is that on Macbook Pro's they ditch thunderbolt 2 entirely for thunderbolt 3.
     
  8. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #8
    TB3 is NOT required to use the USB-C connector, it just CAN.


    So buy the thunderbolt 3 cable that looks just like every other thunderbolt cable you've ever seen....
     
  9. Stacc macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    #9
    The shape of the connector is not the reason you need an active adapter. Its due to signaling differences. Besides that, I don't think I've seen any implementations of TB3 that use the mini-displayport connector.
     
  10. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #10
    It was my understanding that every instance of TB is backwards compatible with the previous, so I'm not sure why you can't just buy a miniDP TB3 to use with your TB2 gear. Also, Apple will implement TB3 however they see fit, so stay tuned folks!
     
  11. killawat macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2014
    #11
    Let us know when you find a TB3 device riding miniDP. You won't, USB-C is the official connector for TB3. Apple could be silly and rig TB3 to miniDP, sure, but it would no longer be thunderbolt 3. Its not really up for debate. The connector is standard.
     
  12. initialsBB macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    #12
  13. beaker7 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2009
    #13
    No real surprise here. Pushing the needed connectivity out of the Mac and onto your desk in the way of cables, external boxes, and adapters has been priority #1 for years with Apple.
     
  14. FireWire2, May 12, 2016
    Last edited: May 16, 2016

    FireWire2 macrumors 6502

    FireWire2

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    #14
    Let assume the new Mac has Thunderbolt 3 port! Great. but using this adapter does not automatically give the user a 40Gb/s. It's complete defeat the update! We need faster and better system.

    Instead of adding nothing good to the new Thunderbolt 3 port of new Mac, why not buy a thunderbolt 2 that upgrade-able to thunderbolt 3 solution

    http://www.datoptic.com/ec/jbod-raid-data-storage-solutions/thunderbolt-2-products.html

    T12-S6.TB2 is what I have

    Edit: add a link
     

Share This Page