There's no such thing as an intel chipset with built-in USB3.
I think you've smoked too much USB granola. I don't use USB for anything except my mouse. My external hard drives, both my cameras, my card reader, my DVD burner, and my flat bed scanner are all Firewire. Once equivalent Light Peak devices come available, I'll transition to that.Oh man stop drinking the koolaid dime. USB3 is still super fast compared to usb2 which is what 99% of people use now, and unlike thunderbolt there are actually usb3 products on the market. Also intel has said they will start supporting usb3 this year. Besides most devices won't even max out a usb3 connection so what's the point of using a faster IO?
Because if more people use thunderbolt then more manufacturers will use it instead of inferior technologies like USB 2.0 and 3.0.Besides most devices won't even max out a usb3 connection so what's the point of using a faster IO?
Oh man stop drinking the koolaid dime. USB3 is still super fast compared to usb2 which is what 99% of people use now, and unlike thunderbolt there are actually usb3 products on the market. Also intel has said they will start supporting usb3 this year. Besides most devices won't even max out a usb3 connection so what's the point of using a faster IO?
I think you've smoked too much USB granola. I don't use USB for anything except my mouse. My external hard drives, both my cameras, my card reader, my DVD burner, and my flat bed scanner are all Firewire. Once equivalent Light Peak devices come available, I'll transition to that.
Sorry, but USB just plain sucks. It provides almost no bus power, it has very high latency, bandwidth absolutely sucks when you compare actual to theoretical, which is due to massive protocol overhead. Also, it isn't isochronous, which is required for audio and video work. USB3 is a hack on top of a band-aid. It's a piss poor solution.
Your tinkertoy USB devices are not what media professionals use.
Haha, USB 3.0 will kick a$$ and you won't have it. Suck it up!
Bringing us back to the original point of this thread, is a USB 3 to Thunderbolt adapter even possible?
I don't see why it won't be possible.
And I wouldn't be surprised if Apple implements USB 3.0 in the 2012 MBP refresh.
I don't see why it won't be possible.
And I wouldn't be surprised if Apple implements USB 3.0 in the 2012 MBP refresh.
I think you've smoked too much USB granola. I don't use USB for anything except my mouse. My external hard drives, both my cameras, my card reader, my DVD burner, and my flat bed scanner are all Firewire. Once equivalent Light Peak devices come available, I'll transition to that.
Sorry, but USB just plain sucks. It provides almost no bus power, it has very high latency, bandwidth absolutely sucks when you compare actual to theoretical, which is due to massive protocol overhead. Also, it isn't isochronous, which is required for audio and video work. USB3 is a hack on top of a band-aid. It's a piss poor solution.
Your tinkertoy USB devices are not what media professionals use.
Media professionals don't use AMD GPUs, either, because so many programs only officially support nvidia. Avid and Adobe, to name two that I use a ton.Your tinkertoy USB devices are not what media professionals use.
Lol cause that makes sense. Help develop a better standard then include the slower standard a year later. I would bank on either another tb port or one less USB port next year.
So professionals aren't using Blackmagic's UltraStudio Pro? or USB 3.0 drives over FireWire 800? It must be nice to know every media professional.
You Apple slaves! You would buy and defend it to death if Apple started selling Steve Jobs' poo.
Doesn't the new Macbook Pro have USB 2.0 ports. They could have been USB 3.0 as well. (Still keeping the SOO beloved Thunderbolt) Wake up!