Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iChat AV requirements

So, I'm all psyched and excited about Tiger, but I just read something that's slightly disconcerting to me. It says to "initiate" 4-way video conferencing, I need at least 1 GHz dual G4! Does this mean, with my 1GHz iMac G4, I'm still stuck with 1 on 1??? I was so excited about group conferencing? Tell me it's not so! :(
 
clcnyc said:
Tell me it's not so! :(

Ok.... It isn't so.

I read that too. But my conclusion was that those are "recomended" requirements. it will probably still work. I don't imagine there being any kind of system varification process before you use iChat.
 
appleretailguy said:
Does it really matter to your profs whether you write a paper on an SE-30 with Office 98 or a dual G5 with Office 2004?

YES!!!! Where's your spirit of appleness? Everyone needs a G5.
 
appleretailguy said:
Does it really matter to your profs whether you write a paper on an SE-30 with Office 98 or a dual G5 with Office 2004?

Well, I study architecture so I would really prefer the G5 - with or without office...

A
 
liv2wrshp said:
So does anyone know how to do a network install?

I was going to say...

I did something similar to that with my G3 iBook, and it worked fine. I put the DVD in my iMac G4's drive, turned on file sharing. Then connected my iBook to the iMac via AirPort, and logged onto the iMac... mounting the DVD.

From there you have access to the DVD. It was a little slower, but not much difference.

But, a Mac OS X install would require you to reboot from the DVD/CD. So I don't think sharing the DVD would work.
 
Creating a disk image wouldn't work either. Hummm...

I guess you could extract the image onto your iPod and try to boot from it.
 
joshuawaire said:
Creating a disk image wouldn't work either. Hummm...

I guess you could extract the image onto your iPod and try to boot from it.

That's an interesting idea. I wonder if it would work.
 
TigerPRO said:
Well, look at the bright side. After the $5,000 you won't have the pay the $129. Or why not just pick yourself up one of these Mac minis. It would be dirt cheap and definately an improvement on what you've got. Plus you'd have Tiger.

While it is true that a Macmini would be very affordable, I am hesitant to go that route because of how long I must hold on to new equipment. My G3 is going on 6 yrs old. Now while I don't feel that Apple should cater to the lowest common denominator as someone else posted. What I was trying to say was that just because your hadware is old, doesn't mean that you choose to become obsolete. When I bought my G3 I went with-at the time-the top of the line, maxing it out as much as I could, because I knew it would be quite some time before I could purchase a new computer.

I don't regret staying with my machine, but I do think it is a bit short sighted to assume that just because someone works on an older machine, it must be because they want to. Just for reference Imy work consists of Flash development, video editing, animation and a great deal of Photoshop and Illustrator work.

Sorry for being long-winded, just wanted to clarify my original statement.
 
Duh...

dotdotdot said:
Why would you need Firewire?

...even though most Macs have firewire already...

It is just a way to classify processor types and speeds. If I remember right, any Mac with Firewire is at least a 400mhz G3. It's easier to say "must have firewire" than denote processor speeds and types.
 
I think the next person to say people who don't have DVD drives in their computers should buy me a new computer.
And the next person who says all "students" do is write papers on office 98 should do my next mech eng design project.

Anyways, I understand them not wanting to put CD-ROM versions in stores, but it doesn't make much sense to order the DVDs from them online, get that shipped to your house, take the DVDs out of the box and then send em back to them and wait for the cds. Why not make the cds immediately order-able off the site?
 
If 400Mhz and 256MB of RAM are the minumum, I don't think I'll bother installing Tiger on my 500Mhz iBook with 384MB of RAM. I don't imagine it will do too well on there.

I'm also not sure how I'd clear off enough space on the 10GB hard drive.
 
TigerPRO said:
Retarded - To cause to move or proceed slowly; delay or impede.

PS/2 ports are way slow. Apple was smart I think in pushing on into the future without alowing themselves to have to drag behind them the huge weight of staying compliant with old useless technology. It was smart to abandom the floppy when they did, it is smart to abandon CDs.

What Apple should have done with the Mac mini, was not add a PS/2 port, but throw a "PS/2 -> USB adapter" into the box. Otherwise they would have ruined the perfect example of modern, forwarding looking technology the mini exibits.

umm to tell you the turth PS2 ports are faster than USB for keyboard and mice. They have a lot bandwith for data but then again mice and keyboards dont need to send that much data and they have more bandwith that a keyboard or mouse could ever need.

PS2 ports can run at 200hz compared to the 125hz max of a USB port. So the refresh rate for a ps2 port is higher than a USB. Figure I would correct you on that.
 
NONE OF YOU HAVE TO UPGRADE!!!!

They aren't pointing a gun at your head.
They aren't demanding it.
They aren't even asking you to do it.

Sorry that the newest thing doesn't run on your computer. Core Image doesn't run on mine. The lack of CD's were obviously to cut costs, as the operating system is starting to get very very big.
 
jeffy.dee-lux said:
I think the next person to say people who don't have DVD drives in their computers should buy me a new computer.
And the next person who says all "students" do is write papers on office 98 should do my next mech eng design project.

Being a grad student, I know that more work than writing papers on office '98 is required. My point is I don't need a new Mac, the latest operating system and a fast superdrive to get my work done and neither do most students.
 
Ktulu said:
I am one of those people who do not have a DVD, not even a ComboDrive. I have a 450 G3 B/W. Yes my hardware is old, however I do not heve the resources to upgrade my machine every time, or even every other time a processor or model changes.

However I am currently running Panther. I would like to keep up on the newes OS that I can, but $129 is much easier to come up with than $5,000 <- this is with upgraded memory, etc.

Rather than spending $5,000 on a new uber-G5, or $800 on a Mini (I mean, who's gonna run on 256 megs of RAM?), how about spending $20 on a DVD drive? I'm right with you on the outdated Mac thing (see sig), but some upgrades are necessary...
 
why don't you wait until Tiger comes out and see how it goes?

I'm pretty sure there will be some benchmarks into different hardwares so that you can see if buying Tiger will worth your while and your money.
 
The ram went up from 128-256 if I 'm not wrong, well the apple better give us 512MB standard NOW ;)
 
OK GUYS please

Here is the deal if you don't have a machine with DVD then tough or get the cd version.
Sorry if you have an old blue and white or similar and can't afford an upgrade then tough stick with what you have.
Now if you have a tower then just upgrade (benq do DVD drives for about £30 that you can install). If you can't afford that then it is hard luck.
Imac users may find it much harder but then just buy an external DVD drive where possible,

Of course some people will be left behind well that is unfortunate, Apple do very well at supporting older machines, I mean we are talking about macs that are several years old on the whole.

Please move on nothing to see in the I can't install debate, you can and if you can't then don't. Simple really the world does go on.
 
unfaded said:
NONE OF YOU HAVE TO UPGRADE!!!!

They aren't pointing a gun at your head.
They aren't demanding it.
They aren't even asking you to do it.

Sorry that the newest thing doesn't run on your computer. Core Image doesn't run on mine. The lack of CD's were obviously to cut costs, as the operating system is starting to get very very big.

Thank you.

I know some people are disappointed that Tiger won't work on your Mac, but that is the nature of the beast.

I know school is expensive, but it's not the end of the world not to be using the most current version of an operating system.

Plus, the mini is 500 bucks...as low as 320 bucks on ebay...it's much easier to save for than any other time in the history of Apple
 
Enjoy Panther!

Coming from a recent convert (PC to Mac) I will say that I don't see the point in upgrading at this time. Panther is tested and works well. At some point it will be inevitable but for now, enjoy Panther while it is still at the top of its game. If widgets are that important to you or you have some other desire to get the latest and greatest then, by all means, run out and buy it (or point and click it as the case may be). For my needs, I can justify a new operating system for Widgets. I simply don't need Core Imaging to write a brief or memorandum. I am (dare I say it?) satisfied!

I've had a great experience with Panther so far and am not ready for another change. Others are probably just tired of Panther and want something for the sake of newness rather than an absolute need for the alleged 200 upgraded features. Enjoy Panther!

Here's an example of a reason to upgrade ... in the PC world there was this abomination called Windows Mellinnium Edition. XP was a must have upgrade to that travesty of an operating system. Panther, on the other hand, works well and it is much more difficult to justify the upgrade for an existing iBook or Powerbook, especially one that barely meets the minimum requirements. Again, enjoy Panther and, if you must, waste your money on Tiger. If you have a new, top of the line system that will benefit from Tiger and its features then you have a better case. It may still be weak, however, if you won't actually use the new features.
 
Really?

miloblithe said:
If 400Mhz and 256MB of RAM are the minumum, I don't think I'll bother installing Tiger on my 500Mhz iBook with 384MB of RAM. I don't imagine it will do too well on there.

I'm also not sure how I'd clear off enough space on the 10GB hard drive.

I have a 500MHz G3 PowerBook with 384MB RAM, and am definately going to try installing it. On the apple website it explains the kind of install that simply upgrades (thereby not needing all the space unless you wanted to archive your current OS). I also have about 10GB of usable space. If this PB were my only system though, i'd be a little more hesitant.
Needles to say i'll install it on my iMac G4 first for a week or two to see how it goes.
I think if your machine runs Panther OK, Tiger will be about the same, if not quicker (finder wise anyway).
 
James Philp said:
I have a 500MHz G3 PowerBook with 384MB RAM, and am definately going to try installing it. On the apple website it explains the kind of install that simply upgrades (thereby not needing all the space unless you wanted to archive your current OS). I also have about 10GB of usable space. If this PB were my only system though, i'd be a little more hesitant.
Needles to say i'll install it on my iMac G4 first for a week or two to see how it goes.
I think if your machine runs Panther OK, Tiger will be about the same, if not quicker (finder wise anyway).

I will try to install it on ALL my hardware (apart from my LC475 of course and my iPod :D :D ). I want to perform some tests to see how it goes. Needless to say, Panther runs in all my hardware (again excluding my LC475 which has system 7.1 and my iPod :D ). Look at my specs below. Even my g3 350 Mhz runs panther OK. I think it will run Tiger, too.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.