Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.


In an interview with He Shijie, a senior at the Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Apple CEO Tim Cook called 2020 Apple's "top year of innovation ever."

0077UHgXly1gnrxf0b728j31hc0u0e0q.jpg


In 2020, Apple released a number of new products, ranging from the iPhone 12 lineup, to brand new iPads, the Apple Watch Series 6 and SE, and of course, new Apple Silicon Macs. Putting all of that together, Tim Cook says Apple innovated in 2020 more than any other year, but notes that "there's no formula for innovation."

Shijie asked Cook about the stress, and process that Apple goes through to release new products every year. The CEO says it's enabled largely by putting people with diverse skills, backgrounds, and passions together, allowing them to do their lives' best work, and that "one plus one has always been more than two at Apple."On the new iPhone 12 lineup, Cook says Apple's having "an incredible time with it," reiterating comments he made at the company's latest earnings call. Regarding the new Apple Silicon Macs, Cook called the performance of the M1 chip "jaw-dropping," and that "it screams. It's so fast."

Apple's business in China continues to be a backbone for the company. In Q4 of 2020, iPhone 12 sales in the country hit 18 million units, and Tim Cook called the response "phenomenal" earlier last month. Shijie, living in China, asked Cook about whether there are features that are based on customers' feedback from China. Cook named a few, including iOS 13 dark mode, QR readers, specific keyboards, and 5G.
Shijie also brought up the subject of his grandmother, who he notes is having a hard time learning how to use an iPhone. He asks Cook what Apple can do to "give wings to the elderly and to the digital world."
The remainder of the interview covers topics such as Cook's past trips to China and his love for interacting with people, the importance of education and expanding access to it around the world, and advice for people who are still seeking to find the job they love. You can watch the interview with English and Chinese subtitles here.

Article Link: Tim Cook: 2020 Was Apple's 'Top Year of Innovation Ever'

Guess he forgot about 2007 when the iPhone was brought to life, or later when the iPad was brought to life.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: I7guy and Feyl
Correction. Cook is a rich, soda pop salesman, who has taken the valuation of Apple to new highs. Had a blockbuster record-breaking quarter. Record breaking revenue in some services sectors. Record breaking revenue in wearables.

While Apple may not be batting 100%, they are up there in the high 90s.

For a soda pop salesman, Apple is doing quite well under his leadership.
You can't sit there and tell us Cook has anything to do with this. The stock would be doing just as well, or even better if Jobs were still alive. All Cook is doing is milking the system Jobs created for him.
 
You can't sit there and tell us Cook has anything to do with this. The stock would be doing just as well, or even better if Jobs were still alive. All Cook is doing is milking the system Jobs created for him.
You can’t sit there and make a confirmed statement based off some projection of what you think (Not know) where the company stock would be ‘If Jobs were still alive...’

But let’s confirm one thing we both know, Cook has put this company in heights that Steve never did financially and overall highly profitable with products that have dominated the competition. If you can’t acknowledge that, then you’re purposely being ignorant.
 
"brand new iPads"

An iPad Pro that only changed the camera and kept the processor from 2018, highly innovative. I mean don't get me wrong, it's a great product, but it's still not much more than the 2018.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dark_Omen
You can’t sit there and make a confirmed statement based off some projection of what you think (Not know) where the company stock would be ‘If Jobs were still alive...’

But let’s confirm one thing we both know, Cook has put this company in heights that Steve never did financially and overall highly profitable with products that have dominated the competition. If you can’t acknowledge that, then you’re purposely being ignorant.
Lots of stocks have exploded since 2012, not just Apple's. Cook is simply milking out Steve's innovations... iPhone, iPad, Macbook Air, the App Store, and Music.

It's pretty easy to assume the stock would be doing just as well or better without Cook. Cook has barely changed anything except for the latest microchips and display technology since he's taken over the company. All he's done is tweak the existing cash cow products Steve invented.

Anything else Cook has supposedly innovated since Jobs died has failed. The Apple Watch is still a device that's considered an afterthought to most people. Apple TV+ stinks - I'd rather have Hulu or Netflix. Apple Arcade is filled with children's games that get boring after 5 minutes. What has he done that's great for the tech world? Apple Car? Another failure... We've been talking about an Apple Car for years and there's still no progress with it.

Cook is a failure that's thriving off of Steve's jobs' inventions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Feyl
You can't sit there and tell us Cook has anything to do with this. The stock would be doing just as well, or even better if Jobs were still alive. All Cook is doing is milking the system Jobs created for him.
Yep, in conversations similar to this, others have tried to intimate that "any moron" could have run Apple and gotten it to where it is today. If that is really the case that people really believe that the job of a CEO requires no smarts, skill, finesse etc, and that it only requires a running company, than essentially anybody could be CEO of a fortune 500 company...but that's not the case in reality is it?
 
Lots of stocks have exploded since 2012, not just Apple's. Cook is simply milking out Steve's innovations... iPhone, iPad, Macbook Air, the App Store, and Music.

It's pretty easy to assume the stock would be doing just as well or better without Cook. Cook has barely changed anything except for the latest microchips and display technology since he's taken over the company. All he's done is tweak the existing cash cow products Steve invented.

Anything else Cook has supposedly innovated since Jobs died has failed. The Apple Watch is still a device that's considered an afterthought to most people. Apple TV+ stinks - I'd rather have Hulu or Netflix. Apple Arcade is filled with children's games that get boring after 5 minutes. What has he done that's great for the tech world? Apple Car? Another failure... We've been talking about an Apple Car for years and there's still no progress with it.

Cook is a failure that's thriving off of Steve's jobs' inventions.
You are entitled to your opinion, but the universe is against you. Apple is a $2T company, has broken revenue records. It's wearables are the size of a fortune 500 company. Apple watch is dominating. Most of what Apple has done are massive successes and to bolster your point, you focus on the items that are still in transition while ignoring the successes.

But it's perfectly fine you don't like Cook and have a narrow view of where Apple is today. But @Relentless Power power put it very well.
 
You can’t sit there and make a confirmed statement based off some projection of what you think (Not know) where the company stock would be ‘If Jobs were still alive...’

But let’s confirm one thing we both know, Cook has put this company in heights that Steve never did financially and overall highly profitable with products that have dominated the competition. If you can’t acknowledge that, then you’re purposely being ignorant.
You know, Apple was going up and up and up during the Jobs era too. It's not like Steve was hurting the company. What makes you think that their growth would stop? With Steve Apple surpassed Microsoft in market cap. And it was on the road already to be the most valuable company. Steve co-founded the company and resurrected it from the dead. Unlike Tim who didn't founded or created anything in his life. He's just keeping the momentum. He's not a product person and doesn't understand design. All he do perfectly is making so many products and making the manufacturing cheap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dark_Omen
There was a time, a long, wonderful time, when Apple’s products did not require a manual. Back when it was us (Mac) against the world (PC), it was the debate differentiator card I played often. “Yeah, but my shtuff just works.” But that time has faded. That card’s value, waning.

It’s been a slow - virtually imperceptible - decline that, frankly, I’m not sure wasn’t inevitable given the complexities of potentials in our current handhelds and at the scale Apple is now navigating. Today’s user-base is not the ‘98 user-base.

iOS is a UX cluster of hidden actions, inconsistency and incredibly non-intuitive functionality. As the family’s acting Helpdesk, I used to be able to walk anyone through any Mac issue over the phone with no devices in front of me as reference. But now... Most times I have to pull out a similar device - sometimes the exact same model - and walk through the steps with them. And more telling, ~15% of the time, we are unable to solve the riddle - which, for me, is the most unApple thing I’ve experienced.

Yeah yeah... Old dog, new tricks. But this is not that. Anyone who is paying attention has noticed the bloat that is iOS. So many actionable features offer no indication - visual or other - that it’s actionable. Or, an actionable feature is visually presented one way in one setting, and another way in another setting. Can’t count the number of times touch & hold magically reveals some hidden functionality that offered zero indication it was hidden. Just yields a bunch of users touching and holding in situations where sometimes it yields an action, other times it doesn’t.

As one who has spent a couple of decades professionally pondering user interface and design, I always felt the initial skeumorphic tendencies in iOS were a necessary evil so that the masses would quickly inject the dots that “yellow lined ‘paper’” was like a “legal pad for taking notes.” But those limitations are born from a completely different era/context. A pane of glass that can reconfigure to be anything offers up a whole new and exciting potential in what it means to interface with technology. It that regard, what does a note taking scenario look like? Is it still yellow & striped? With this potential new language, comes responsibility. And while I greatly prefer the cleaner aesthetic Apple is leveraging, I don’t at the cost of functionality. I believe there remains significant tidying on the UX side of the experience.

Sorry. It’s Friday... Get off my lawn time has come to a close.

As you were.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Romeo_Nightfall
There was a time, a long, wonderful time, when Apple’s products did not require a manual. [...]
When was the above magical time?. I went to Apple class in 2010 to learn IOS. So to me since 2010, Apple products started under Steve Jobs required a manual. So if Apple products today require a manual, nothing has changed on that front in 11 years.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Romeo_Nightfall
When was the above magical time?. I went to Apple class in 2010 to learn IOS. So to me since 2010, Apple products started under Steve Jobs required a manual. So if Apple products today require a manual, nothing has changed on that front in 11 years.
Before both 2010 and iOS.
 
Yep, in conversations similar to this, others have tried to intimate that "any moron" could have run Apple and gotten it to where it is today. If that is really the case that people really believe that the job of a CEO requires no smarts, skill, finesse etc, and that it only requires a running company, than essentially anybody could be CEO of a fortune 500 company...but that's not the case in reality is it?
Disagree. Cook was handed future success on a platter. Often, new CEOs have to take care of a mess the CEO in front of them left -- look at Michael Corbat -- the board "pushed him out." In reality, Corbat is being fired because Citi is a mess and a laughing joke, but to be fair to Corbat, he also inherited a mess, but made it worse over the years.

As much as I rag on Cook, there are definitely worse CEO's out there [Corbat]. But to call Cook a great CEO? Not even close. He's average and just a numbers guy. He's not a tech guy running tech company. It's the equivalent of a numbers guy being the CEO of a hospital instead of a well respected MD.

Apple is now all about how colorful and politically correct the company can be, and tries its best to squeeze every penny out of each sale to inflate profits, which is why your $500 Apple Watch no longer comes with a charger anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Feyl
Disagree. Cook was handed future success on a platter. Often, new CEOs have to take care of a mess the CEO in front of them left -- look at Michael Corbat -- the board "pushed him out." In reality, Corbat is being fired because Citi is a mess and a laughing joke, but to be fair to Corbat, he also inherited a mess, but made it worse over the years.

As much as I rag on Cook, there are definitely worse CEO's out there [Corbat]. But to call Cook a great CEO? Not even close. He's average and just a numbers guy. He's not a tech guy running tech company. It's the equivalent of a numbers guy being the CEO of a hospital instead of a well respected MD.

Apple is now all about how colorful and politically correct the company can be, and tries its best to squeeze every penny out of each sale to inflate profits, which is why your $500 Apple Watch no longer comes with a charger anymore.
Ok. We don't agree on this topic. No biggie.

The universe though is more slanted in suggesting that Cook has done a phenomenal job and is great CEO, than what you propose, which is he got lucky and got by on a wing and a prayer.

And it's fine that Apple is a colorful, politically correct company that is "greedy" (sic). Those who want to buy from the company will and those who don't want to, won't. Won't affect their bottom line any.
 
Last edited:
Lol can’t argue with that. They did figure out how to scam their entire customer base out of getting basic accessories in the box of a $1000+ product and people continue to defend that on here.

getting people to throw away common sense in the name of blind corporate loyalty is pretty innovative not gonna lie
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dark_Omen and Feyl
You can’t sit there and make a confirmed statement based off some projection of what you think (Not know) where the company stock would be ‘If Jobs were still alive...’
Hah! If Jobs were still alive we would not only already have an Apple Car, but a Flying Apple Car to that, perhaps even a Mac Space X Car, so that we can catch up with the stock price leaving the atmosphere!
 
Lol can’t argue with that. They did figure out how to scam their entire customer base out of getting basic accessories in the box of a $1000+ product and people continue to defend that on here.

getting people to throw away common sense in the name of blind corporate loyalty is pretty innovative not gonna lie
Well the old adage about fooling some people some of the time. So are you saying they fooled all the people all of the time? If that's so, maybe they actually didn't scam anybody and people who don't understand made up their own stories about what Apple did?

However, what is done, is done.
 
Well the old adage about fooling some people some of the time. So are you saying they fooled all the people all of the time? If that's so, maybe they actually didn't scam anybody and people who don't understand made up their own stories about what Apple did?

However, what is done, is done.
Not sure what any of that meant but I wasn’t interested in fishing for fan justifications. Thanks though bud
 
Correction. Cook is a rich, soda pop salesman, who has taken the valuation of Apple to new highs. Had a blockbuster record-breaking quarter. Record breaking revenue in some services sectors. Record breaking revenue in wearables.

While Apple may not be batting 100%, they are up there in the high 90s.

For a soda pop salesman, Apple is doing quite well under his leadership.
But financial success doesn't really correlate much with innovation. Cook's contention is that this was a more innovative year than both 1984 and 2007, and… ehhhh.
 
But financial success doesn't really correlate much with innovation. Cook's contention is that this was a more innovative year than both 1984 and 2007, and… ehhhh.
This is a bit like how many angels can fit on the head of a pin.

Timeline of Apple Inc. products - Wikipedia

There is certainly innovation contained in the product releases. I guess we can debate the relative innovativeness of all of this.
 
I think the pandemic showed just what a tightly-run ship Apple is under Tim Cook's tenure. They were able to still manage to keep to their annual cadre of software updates, as well as release a slew of new products and services.

Ultimately, I will argue that having the most innovative products in the world won't count for anything if you can't manufacture enough of them to sell to consumers.

Steve Jobs was right for his era of Apple, just as Tim Cook is possibly the person best suited to running the Apple of today.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.