Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
“The Washington Post, The Associated Press, Reuters, and The Wall Street Journal – publications that are traditionallly considered either center outlets or nonpartisan.”

Nonpartisan?? Looks like MR is also pushing left wing propaganda. These are far-left activist organizations, but unfortunately, 90% of mainstream media has become a left wing propaganda machine, turning otherwise normal citizens into deranged lunatics. The below is just a small sample of all the left wing propaganda/ disinformation they helped spread in the last few years. How many times will they get caught lying before the other 40% of the population finally wakes up and realizes they’re being gaslit? Real journalists have gone indie and that’s where everyone should get their news.
Thank you for sharing. I agree with you. The far left legacy medias will die soon. X is the way
 
Its about time. Its truly unfortunate that news has become left and right but it has. I'm tired of trying to have discussions with people that wake up to apple news as their only source and only know half the story and don't know about some news event and stories at all.
 
Last edited:
“The Washington Post, The Associated Press, Reuters, and The Wall Street Journal – publications that are traditionallly considered either center outlets or nonpartisan.”

Nonpartisan?? Looks like MR is also pushing left wing propaganda. These are far-left activist organizations, but unfortunately, 90% of mainstream media has become a left wing propaganda machine,


My guy, you're calling the AP and Reuters propaganda and then link to nothing but breitbart. What reality do you live in?
 
One of the main reasons I get ONE plus is for news. It won’t let me remove stuff I don’t want to see. So if they start adding right wing crap, I’m out. Good news is I’ll save $38 a month.
 
My guy, you're calling the AP and Reuters propaganda and then link to nothing but breitbart. What reality do you live in?
The difference is Breitbart bills itself as a conservative news outlet whereas the AP and Reuters bills itself as being objective which is the very definition of propaganda and misinformation. And had you been reading Breitbart, you would have known that Russian collusion was a hoax, that Hunter Biden’s laptop was real and not Russian disinformation, that Biden’s cognitive decline was being covered up, etc., etc.
 
Thank you for sharing. I agree with you. The far left legacy medias will die soon. X is the way
From what I see, it is the far left that controls most media outlets. The far left is also the most organized, hateful, and violent of the two "Sides". Not that the "Far Right" is innocent either. I don't consider myself "Right Wing", but for sure I would never consider myself someone on the left.
The difference is Breitbart bills itself as a conservative news outlet whereas the AP and Reuters bills itself as being objective which is the very definition of propaganda and misinformation. And had you been reading Breitbart, you would have known that Russian collusion was a hoax, that Hunter Biden’s laptop was real and not Russian disinformation, that Biden’s cognitive decline was being covered up, etc., etc.
All things that are true and obvious to anyone who even does any remote level of research. It isn't just about Breitbart.
 
You know you're on the right track when you think everyone else is stupid.



It's almost as if some of the "sheeple" are able to read between the lines. As an aside, quotation marks aren't just for direct quotes.

Some people hear or see what they want to. I can't control that.

I'm sure some people on the right thought it was a dig at them, and people on the left felt the same way.

I'm not responsible for you reading your low self esteem into my comments. Oh well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnWick1954
Nope. Permanent victimhood is not only the foundation of the Republican Party, it’s their only consistent principle.
You mean like the only party that voted to pass the civil rights act (not one democrat voted for it). The only party republican that was founded for the sole purpose to fight against slavery. The only party that was NOT predominantly members of the KKK. The only party that, as of a decade or so ago, did not support a senior member of the KKK as an elected official.

Maybe you need to study some history.
 
AppleTV is pretty solid. I may not like all the shows but you can’t argue with the production quality. I do wish I could tell it to stop advertising specific shows to me on the front page of the device AppleTV. Like I don’t want horror shows scaring my family. I also don’t want xenophobic war propaganda like Tehran being shoved in my face all the time. so in that regard you are probably right getting into content means you’re going damage your brand unnecessarily when you’re a hardware company.
Apple TV content is good now. The App and its UI, it a complete mess. There are times I have to use search to find Apple owned content.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Delivered
The news app has never been good. It ignores content I have asked to see less of and gives me more of it. Just another native Apple app I do not use. My Apple devices are launching platforms for 3rd party software. Liquid Glass has irritated me to no end and the crazy rounded corners of apps in MacOS 26 makes it look like kind of Fisher Price toy OS.

Apple has peaked and it riding on momentum that is driven by mee too purchases and people that do not like change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnWick1954
U
From what I see, it is the far left that controls most media outlets. The far left is also the most organized, hateful, and violent of the two "Sides". Not that the "Far Right" is innocent either. I don't consider myself "Right Wing", but for sure I would never consider myself someone on the left.

All things that are true and obvious to anyone who even does any remote level of research. It isn't just about Breitbart.
Unfortunately, too many people are dug in based on years of propaganda and are unwilling, or no longer capable, of critical thought to see the hypocrisies and contradictions of an incoherent ideology being pushed on them.

That’s why many of us who have come to see things as “obvious” (like Biden’s cognitive decline or the Dem’s flip flop on mass immigration and ICE from just a few years ago) are not so obvious to those who still rely on mainstream media. It’s not that they’re stupid (the majority of them anyway), but rather, they still think mainstream media is objectively reporting news, not realizing these organizations have been overrun with far-left activists a long time ago, just like our education system. That’s the power of propaganda and indoctrination.
 
U

Unfortunately, too many people are dug in based on years of propaganda and are unwilling, or no longer capable, of critical thought to see the hypocrisies and contradictions of an incoherent ideology being pushed on them.

That’s why many of us who have come to see things as “obvious” (like Biden’s cognitive decline or the Dem’s flip flop on mass immigration and ICE from just a few years ago) are not so obvious to those who still rely on mainstream media. It’s not that they’re stupid (the majority of them anyway), but rather, they still think mainstream media is objectively reporting news, not realizing these organizations have been overrun with far-left activists a long time ago, just like our education system. That’s the power of propaganda and indoctrination.
None of this true. In fact, the mainstream media leans conservative and regularly gives Republicans a pass for things it has previously criticized Democrats for. You need to step out of the Fox News bubble sometime.
 
So you support a child abuser, rapist, and racist.

______


Anyway, doesn't Apple News asks your interests when setting it up and what news sources you typically read? You bet your ass I (as an Apple One Premier subscriber) blocked FOX News and all of those other rags. That's not Apple's choosing though, that was my own decision.
To your first part, no, and I would gladly see any person hung for doing such things to another person, if and when found guilty in a court of law.

Also, if the earthly courts won’t get them in this life. I so very much believe the courts in the next life will and those evil people will suffer for a long time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnWick1954
U

Unfortunately, too many people are dug in based on years of propaganda and are unwilling, or no longer capable, of critical thought to see the hypocrisies and contradictions of an incoherent ideology being pushed on them.

That’s why many of us who have come to see things as “obvious” (like Biden’s cognitive decline or the Dem’s flip flop on mass immigration and ICE from just a few years ago) are not so obvious to those who still rely on mainstream media. It’s not that they’re stupid (the majority of them anyway), but rather, they still think mainstream media is objectively reporting news, not realizing these organizations have been overrun with far-left activists a long time ago, just like our education system. That’s the power of propaganda and indoctrination.
I agree with you on this. However this isn't just a left-wing problem, it takes two to tango - so they say anyway.
 
You mean like the only party that voted to pass the civil rights act (not one democrat voted for it). The only party republican that was founded for the sole purpose to fight against slavery. The only party that was NOT predominantly members of the KKK. The only party that, as of a decade or so ago, did not support a senior member of the KKK as an elected official.

Maybe you need to study some history.
You do realize that the old Republican Party has nothing to do with the current Christian-fascist horror show?
 
You mean like the only party that voted to pass the civil rights act (not one democrat voted for it). The only party republican that was founded for the sole purpose to fight against slavery. The only party that was NOT predominantly members of the KKK. The only party that, as of a decade or so ago, did not support a senior member of the KKK as an elected official.

Maybe you need to study some history.

Lol you know you’ve got a good argument when it was last relevant in <checks notes> 1865. I suggest you do some reading on the concept of party realignment, because this argument is so tired and facile—I’d expect it from an 8th grader, honestly—it hardly warrants a response.

Of course your claim that “not one democrat voted for” the civil rights act is 100%, inarguably wrong, no matter which civil rights act you’re actually talking about (assuming you even knew there’s more than one).
 
News outlets already have platforms where their content is available. Why strong-arm any of those platforms to carry content against their will? This could be seen as a First Amendment issue. Will the FCC bring back the Fairness Doctrine that Reagan's FCC ended, with the result being that outlets like Fox "News" actually become fair and balanced?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.