Thank you, strawman argument.
Taxes are not a means to an end, thus taxes are frequently traded for economic development initiatives.
Macron is trying to go back on a prior agreement (keep the economic investment but now also require the waived tax)—that is, to have his cake and eat it too.
Macron did not make the prior implicit deal, but this is not the way to fix it. Short term if he wins concessions by this threat, long term Apple will slow its investment, which is bad for general economic growth generally. Trump pulls the same tricks: appeal to base, and who cares if you shrink the global economy because you are winning personal side deals.
Tim Cook does not want to withdraw from France, China, or anywhere. Visiting Normany reminds us of war’s terrible losses. WWII arose from economic blocs (tearing up treaties), a shrinking global economy, and the desperate feeling of being trapped within one’s own bankrupt country’s walls. A few countries felt that their only gain was to grab another country’s land, assets, market access. But of course, more war means fewer friends and less access (see Russia).
Treaties and tax laws are messy but more access is better than the alternative. This is why WWII ended with massive global interest in free trade treaties. Tim harkens back to this so that demagogues simple rhetoric does not cause us to lose sight of our past. Do not repeat the past. Stabilize, broaden our vision ... remember allies and multilateral complex trades are better than nationalistic hardline rhetoric.