If I want to be creative on a device I need the software that actually lets me be creative. So to say the lack of decent music software to actually create with only has a tenous link to me not being able to be creative on it is just plain illogical.
Sure I could do video editing to make youtube videos on it, but that's not my bag and I don't find it that "creative" since I'm not making "artistic" movies with interesting storylines or videography (although I do have some YouTube music related tutorials to be fair). ANY decent DAW software supporting the most basic of tempo changes and time signature changes just DOES. NOT. EXIST in my opinion! Trust me - I searched when I got this thing last year and nearly wasted money on apps that would be useless (or just annoyingly limited).
So you can be a Tim apologist as much as you like, but apart from the Mac which has a whole load available, I find their next most capable product which has PLENTY of horsepower to do music production on paper, just COMPLETELY lacking me being able to be properly creative on it (apart from in some tinpot fisher-price way at least). That's somewhat the fault of all developers (I'm still subscribed to that Steinberg forum thread with people pleading for them to add tempo maps to Cubasis), but if Apple aren't gonna put their pro apps on it, why would anyone else bother, especially if they're forced to give a 15-30% cut to Apple when decent DAWs travel word of mouth far more than needing the App store as a sales platform? The iPad will be left out again and people just keep making the creative pro software for "proper computers".
Sure, it's superb for drawing with the apple pencil, but if the man says he'd like people to be a lot more creative on all their devices he should put his money where is mouth is. Not just drawing (which Procreate/Adobe have somewhat nailed), or video (Lumafusion, and various other ones). Apple make Garageband, but that would suck the life out of a lot of decent music though from whenever I've tried to test drive it, and everything would end up sounding like half the awful soulless stuff in the charts, where it's got the same monotanous tempo all the way through, no dynamics and is all horribly quantised with no swing. Logic on the iPad would suddenly start making me use it a load, and may then even tempt me away from Ableton Live to using Logic on the mac too in the long run.
Steve Jobs always seemed far more driven by creative SW. You could tell his passions for iLife to encourage everyone to get started creating, and bundling stuff like Garageband, but then had all the pro apps for people to actually get serious with. He basically said when it was released the iPad was designed as the ultimate media consumption device (take that to be mindless scrolling or inspirational movies/content/learning as you choose) so at the time would never have been able to pull it off. But since he's gone the iPad technology has improved greatly and if he was still here I think he'd be pushing for making the iPad software available that could help Tim be a bit happier that people like me could be making far better use of it's possibilities.
As it stands I'm waiting for new Macs to come out to enable my next generation of creativity, because my iPad currently won't let me. Even though its hardware completely rinses my old Macbook, that struggling old beast that's long past its best is still the go-to device for creativity, purely due to software. And Apple own Logic, one of the most popular DAWs on the market... 🤷♂️