Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

thewall

macrumors regular
Original poster
I’m thinking about reinstalling Mac OS I have used 700gb of 1TB i have TM running all the time, is TM fool proof or is 700gb a big ask,should I back up on another drive
 
It's not foolproof. I once wiped a system, installed a new OS version and then restored the back-up. I wasn't happy about the performance of the new OS so I immediately (within an hour) attempted to roll back everything using the same back-up. Except, MacOS seemed to have wiped the back-up from the disk as soon as it had finished restoring.
 
Last edited:
It's not foolproof. I once wiped a system, installed a new OS version and then restored the back-up. I wasn't happy about the performance of the new OS so I immediately (within an hour) attempted to roll back everything using the same back-up. Except, MacOS seemed to have wiped the back-up from the disk as soon as it had finished restoring.

Time Machine stopped including a full backup of macOS quite a few years ago (since the introduction of the SSV). You have to reinstall the macOS version you want to go back to and then migrate your data.
 
I have had Time Machine lose the plot on a single external back up drive often enough to not rely on it alone.

It is *a* backup source, I would not rely on it as your only backup. I work from iCloud mostly so thats one level, Time Machine is another, important stuff on my NAS is another...
 
My primary use for Time Machine is to data transfer to a new Mac. Done it three times now, including from Ventura to Tahoe, which I thought might pose some challenges for it, given the great gulf in OS versions. It's been solid for that purpose; really solid as in can't imagine much improvement as the transition from one machine to the next is as seamless as one could wish for.

On a very rare occasion, I need to restore a file (I also use dropbox for real-time backup, but it's just certain folders of client documents, so there is a level of redundancy there). Been solid there also, but admittedly rare usage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jchap
I would not solely rely on TM. I haven't found it to be reliable over the years. It would be a good idea to also include something like Carbon Copy Cloner.
Some say that CCC isn’t the most reliable as it’s not upto speed
 
Does TM back up everything ie photo library music , third party apps absolutely everything
 
Empirically, yes it backs up all user data, including 3rd party apps and config files. That said, I'm not sure what the defaults are. As mentioned, I have used it several times to move data, settings, and apps from an old mac to new, and everything is the same. I have yet to find some setting or item of data that didn't transfer.

For example, as mentioned, I recently configed an M4 from a 2017 MBP. The OS was markedly different and there were a number of 3rd party apps that transferred but needed to be updated to Silicon versions from Intel. Even so, all my configurations transferred, at least as far as I can tell.

You can exclude folders/files if you wish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: racerhomie
So with CCC I would copy to an external HD then once I have installed Mac OS download CCC on the fresh install and copy back
Would it cause a problem if the OS were different
 
Not sure what you mean by "not up to speed." It has more granular control than what TM offers.


Carbon Copy Cloner (link) and SuperDuper (link) have run into issues in the past. Because of the increasingly complex structure of the macOS boot drive (link), it is getting increasingly difficult for the 3rd-party Backup App developers to keep up.

This was said on a previous thread i started about cloning
 
If you want a backup you can trust, use CCC.

What are you going to do?
My plan is to reinstall MacOs get rid of all the rubbish first, doing this because the fan sometime goes mental to the point I shut down, if I do this does TM reinstall say the last hour
 
My plan is to reinstall MacOs get rid of all the rubbish first, doing this because the fan sometime goes mental to the point I shut down, if I do this does TM reinstall say the last hour
If I am reading you correctly, it depends on your TM settings.

To be certain, you can manually back up shortly before you erase.

However, there is some risk that the backup contains rubbish, if you intend to restore everything from the backup.

If you restore selectively, say app by app, folder by folder, I suppose there's less risk of bringing the rubbish along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacCheetah3
I would buy a new external drive... move all data manually.

I just copy my folders then re install osx and then move everything over.

I just use Time Machine as a last resort.. I usually just manually manage all my data
 
Some say that CCC isn’t the most reliable as it’s not upto speed
CCC is quite reliable - but it's not a true "Backup" in the sense that Time Machine is. CCC is simply a clone from one particular moment in time; if the data you want wasn't present at the time of that clone it's no good to you.

Time Machine uses incremental backup so that you can restore any file to any point that is saved on the backup. So if I, for example, am making edits on a particular file every day and realize that 7 days ago I accidentally deleted something important from it - with Time Machine I can scroll back to the latest backup before I made that mistake, and restore the file from that date.
 
CCC is quite reliable - but it's not a true "Backup" in the sense that Time Machine is. CCC is simply a clone from one particular moment in time; if the data you want wasn't present at the time of that clone it's no good to you.
I use CCC like you described just to clone my drive, but it does have a couple optional settings that leverage macOS snapshots to keep archival backups much the same way Time Machine does. Have not used it, so can't comment how well it works.
 
CCC is quite reliable - but it's not a true "Backup" in the sense that Time Machine is. CCC is simply a clone from one particular moment in time; if the data you want wasn't present at the time of that clone it's no good to you.

Time Machine uses incremental backup so that you can restore any file to any point that is saved on the backup. So if I, for example, am making edits on a particular file every day and realize that 7 days ago I accidentally deleted something important from it - with Time Machine I can scroll back to the latest backup before I made that mistake, and restore the file from that date.
My problem with TM's incremental backups is that my backups are stored on a NAS. My hardware is 2012 and earlier, including NAS boxes and Macs.

Time Machine always wants to create a sparse bundle on network drives. I can never get it to make a sparse disk image. The difference is that if I need to move a drive image from one place to another, the sparsebundles that TM makes throw up all sorts of permission errors. And if TM loses the plot in backing up, then you're set for an extremely long full back up. Historically, TM lost the plot a lot, because…network drive. And older versions of TM on older versions of MacOS like to fail a lot at drive image creation on network drives.

I finally got tired of all that. Anything important enough to undergo incremental backups goes on Dropbox. Dropbox has incremental backups built in. Just restore the file you need from the website. They go back 6 months.

Carbon Copy Cloner allows me to use sparse disk images, which are easily movable. And then I can just repoint CCC to the disk image. I schedule backups with CCC. One of them, is a hourly backup. But primarily I have daily backups and weekly backups. My weekly backups go to Dropbox. That gives me offsite storage.

In the last month CCC has saved me twice. That's in addition to all the times it's saved me in the past. And since it's a full backup, all I have to do is clone a disk image to a drive. No reinstalling the OS then restoring a backup.

I cannot recall when Time Machine has ever saved me.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.