Yeah but I have a hard time believing users will simply give up the Play store for S beam.
Why not? They gave up iTunes app store for the Playstore way back then and they gave up the playstore for the Windows 8 store. Samsungs app store is better than Microsofts.
Ill assume you dont have one to know what it has.I'd rather stick with iOS. Tizen just doesn't have the broad base that iOS and Android currently have, and doesn't have enough benefit to outweigh that lack of support. I cannot stand Samsung. I really haven't seen Samsung smartphones do anything truly revolutionary. My ancient iPhone 4S could take my heart rate just as well using a free app from the app store, I don't see what is so innovative about their new S5, asides from the fact that it looks like Samsung got a great deal on the same material used to make golf balls.
Ill assume you dont have one to know what it has.
I have never seen an app worth using from Samsung. I could be wrong of course, but Android just seems to have a stranglehold on the open OS market.
Ask webOS users about it. I'm sure they would be happy to tell you about it.
Have you ever had a Samsung Galaxy phone registered with Samsung? In anycase, you might find some things useful in here.
http://apps.samsung.com/mars/main/getMain.as?COUNTRY_CODE=USA
He's right though. There's nothing revolutionary about the GS5. Samsung makes terrible bloatware and pretends its innovative, when in actuality, vanilla android does everything better.
I've had the S4 and S3. In both cases, the samsung apps collected virtual dust in my app drawer.
Revolutionary , ...maybe not but they have some cool features. Great camera with way many more features than any other, the UV blaster is nice, even the heart rate thing where you put your finger on it.
I dont have a S5 so i dont know everything that is on it. There isnt a whole lot innovation going on anywhere lately, phonewise. The only thing i dont like about Samsungs phones is the bloatware. Id rather have it than the iPhone but thats me.
Samsung has a app store and has for a long while so i doubt that will be an issue.
Ill assume you dont have one to know what it has.
My iPhone 4 did that. In 2010. It's not even innovative, yet Samsung pushes it in every advertisement. In fact, they didn't even implement it very well and it produces some pretty inconsistent results.Revolutionary , ...maybe not but they have some cool features. Great camera with way many more features than any other, the UV blaster is nice, even the heart rate thing where you put your finger on it.
I actually bought the GS4 for 2 days. Then I returned it. I couldn't stand it. It was horribly laggy compared to iOS, and a lot of the apps I use were either non existent on Android or were far inferior than their respective iOS implementations. It's a shame, I really looked the size and shape of the phone. But colors on the AMOLED display are WAY off, and no amount of color calibration worked, it was always incorrect, and I need accurate color reproduction even on a mobile device for photography.
Also, the sheer amount of useless bloatware was stunning. They use super fast processors on the galaxy S phones but then they bog them back down with all of the completely unnecessary buggy junk. The amount of lagginess on the galaxy phones with touch wiz is simply unacceptable on a supposedly premium device.
There are many reasons to love the galaxy s phones, but don't pretend that Samsung is doing any serious innovation. They use outright lies in order to boost their numbers in processor benchmarks - that is an indisputable fact. I don't like them as a company, as a corporation they don't show much responsibility.
PS - I am in Vegas as well.