In the end, I suppose, who cares?
This.
In the end, I suppose, who cares?
In the end, I suppose, who cares?
Well, you must since you took the time to respond. Comments like this on forums always crack me up. Couldn't the same be said for most of what gets posted here? Yet here we are.
People arguing over whether their fancy home setup beats a theater are completing missing the point. They clearly just don't understand (or care for) the movie theater experience. I don't care how fancy your home theater setup is, it's simply not the same as viewing a film in a theater. You may have a 96" 8K TV at home, and it may be tack sharp, blowing away the overall "quality" of a movie theater screen. But the viewing experience is still a compromise.
If you're a movie lover, you get it. Home theaters can't replicate the psychological experience of theater viewing, and this has nothing to do with technology. Theaters are very much a blank canvas, a neutral space, the complete opposite of a room in your home. When you step into the theater, you step out of your reality and share a new one with a group of strangers. This is the real power of theater viewing.
The bigger the screen the better when it comes to creating this immersive, shared environment. Very few people have home theaters that come close to even a small movie theater screen. I can understand why Hanks is disappointed. Personally I have no interest in this movie, but it's clearly one of those films that deserves a big screen and immersive, communal experience. Hopefully it will get a proper theatrical release one day.
“I don’t mean to make angry my Apple overlords, but there is a difference in picture and sound quality.”
Not at my house Tom. 4K HDR with 5.2.2 surround sound. I’ll take my setup over a movie theater with sticky floors and overpriced snacks any day.
A basic 4k HDR TV is not expensive anymore so dont think its lucky few at this point.
You don't, you watch it at home in a dedicated room which is acoustically and visually optimized. Build a room first, then put the equipment in. And if you have to, start with a simple setup and upgrade later. For some reason in the last few years, people started to believe they can just put a tiny TV (and yes, I mean 65" or 85" TVs) with some speakers in a room and have a high quality movie experience. 1. Room, 2. Room, 3. Room, 4. Equipment.
Theatres don't have distracting noise coming from 100 people. They're tuned to dampen any sound except for the speakers. It's why theatre are quiet when you walk into them.Theaters also have distracting noises coming from the 100 other people in there with you, so you don’t escape that. The noises I encounter in my own home are much less likely to annoy me than what I find in a theater too, as they’re noises I live with daily and probably mentally filter out at this point. As far as lights go, turn them off?
The bar to quality surround audio isn’t as high as you make it out to be. Your room doesn’t have to be perfect to get spatially directed audio to work as intended. When I watched A Quiet Place, during a certain scene a waterfall sounded like it was directly over my head thanks to Atmos, and my room is far from perfect. Obviously better environments and better equipment lead to better results, but calling surround sound a waste except for purpose-designed rooms is laughable.
HahahahahaAs with music, the audio doesn’t need to be lossless to sound good.
Indeed. This is exactly what I do.
Room design first. Equipment last.
[automerge]1594085670[/automerge]
Theatres don't have distracting noise coming from 100 people. They're tuned to dampen any sound except for the speakers. It's why theatre are quiet when you walk into them.
Hahahahaha
They only dampen sound reflections off the walls, not sound directly from the source or reflected off other hard surfaces.
Yes and that's why theaters are so quiet. The dampening removes all reflected sounds. The only sound left are the ones coming from the source, which have an inverse square log effect on their loudness.
Yes and that's why theaters are so quiet. The dampening removes all reflected sounds. The only sound left are the ones coming from the source, which have an inverse square log effect on their loudness.
“I don’t mean to make angry my Apple overlords, but there is a difference in picture and sound quality.”
Not at my house Tom. 4K HDR with 5.2.2 surround sound. I’ll take my setup over a movie theater with sticky floors and overpriced snacks any day.
The cinema is horrible place - there's no film i've enjoyed more at the cinema than at home - the strangers just make it worse. So does the noise, naff sound, rubbish projector and blurry image, the price, the crap snacks. They're going down the pan and good riddance, won't be missed by many.
Oh wow, it’s almost like..I was speaking extemporaneously, sharing my thoughts in the moment, and then..at the end of my comment...I shared my revelation that...oh, gosh, this doesn’t even matter, does it?
But I agree with you, most of this site is frivolous. I love Apple, so I enjoy reading articles about it, and reading comments about the articles. I despise the hideous nastiness of so many people on here (I can‘t understand why they subject themselves to the misery of reading and commenting on Apple news when it clearly causes them so much pain...or does it?!).
So, you can take back your condescending “comments like this on forums always crack me up” remark, save it for use elsewhere. I’m not some dense cretin who doesn’t realize how his comments may be negatively interpreted. I just like, albeit rarely, jotting down my thoughts.![]()
But then I'd have to support that things are falling down and not up because of gravity as well. Everyone knows. And similarly, what you say would only work if you (your eyes and brain) have no external point of reference to deduct viewing distance to the screen. You always have, because the screen is illuminating part of the room and frame, which in turn gives you a reference of distance to the screen and therefore screen size. Here's a good start (you can find more with the search function): https://www.avsforum.com/forum/23-screens/3087028-bigger-screen-vs-sitting-closer.html. There are also peer-reviewed scientific publications available. I'll leave searching for those to you and others interested in it (be warned, you'll most likely have to pay to access those).Sorry, but saying "no it doesn’t" and "I won’t be a part of" such a discussion doesn’t support anything you say. No need to refer to other threads. You could simply in a sentence or two try and justify your claim.
No worries, we're looking for something different. I'm looking for the best movie experience with the highest quality audio and video. You're looking for a social experience, watching a movie with strangers.Fair enough. I already acknowledged as much in my previous comments. It's obvious that many people in this thread don't care one bit for the theater experience.
Sorry, that is wrong. Dampening should not remove all reflected sound. That would be the equivalent of sitting in a anechoic chamber. You do not want this, it sound's horrible. Anechoic chambers are for measuring performance of a speaker without the influence of the room. Another option would be to perform near field measurements with NF scanner systems (https://www.klippel.de/products/rd-system/modules/nfs-near-field-scanner.html). What you want is a mix of direct, reflected sound and a reverberation time (RT60, -60dB or 1/1,000,000 of it's original energy) that is within the recommended limit for the room size. Rule of thumb, first reflections within 30ms are perceived as direct sound, everything above as coming from the room. Here's the recommendation from JBL for their cinema systems:Yes and that's why theaters are so quiet. The dampening removes all reflected sounds. The only sound left are the ones coming from the source, which have an inverse square log effect on their loudness.
It’s called jealousy.I don’t think Hanks is worried about the money he makes from it. You don’t think he has a skill that contributes to society? Ok.....
Basic 4K HDR means crap stereo speakers too. Everybody has different setups, thus different perspective of the film. If you’re an artist producing a piece of art, you’d want everyone to enjoy it at its full glory, fullfiling a certain minimum standard. Hence his disappointment.
The distance between my house and the impolite people in the theater completely dampens their noise. I'll keep watching at home, where the popcorn costs pennies and the rental is just a few bucks.
Music has been proven to be indistinguishable. Not the same for video.