Could you please add a column comparing 6-mo posts to 6-mo likes? Ie. just divide one up the other, or something similar you feel cool.
Also, +1!
Also, +1!
Wowzers... heck of job on this! Like others have mentioned I love seeing the stats of everyone! Again good job!!
I'll take credit for inventing the Top Posters threads, but by automating more of it chown33 has done a better job than I ever did, and provided much more information.
Poor old @mad jew. I wonder if he is aware that he is the benchmark for posters on MR?I'll take credit for inventing the Top Posters threads, but by automating more of it chown33 has done a better job than I ever did, and provided much more information.
I was surprised that chown33 has kept the "Can mad jew be Stopped?" tradition, but pleased to see it continue. It's important (at least to me) to know that Jaffa Cake will pass mad jew in April 8265. Another event worthy of popcorn spectatorship!
Would be nice to see the last 50 posters as well ala Susan Lucci.
As far as I know, there are countless thousands of members who have made no post, or have posted one post...
Here you go:
Code:Posts Members Members Percentage Percentage (Jan 2012) (Feb 2014) (Jan 2012) (Feb 2014) ---- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 0 193741 251348 33.95% 33.82% 1 142925 190620 25.05% 25.65% 2 58572 76194 10.26% 10.25% 3 31477 40825 5.52% 5.49% 4 20032 25786 3.51% 3.47% 5 14209 18121 2.49% 2.44% 6 - 10 34773 44761 6.09% 6.02% 11 - 30 34729 44020 6.09% 5.92%
Banned members are excluded from these counts.
Here's a current chart. As we've noted before, only a small fraction of forum members have high post counts.While I have no idea of the exact numbers involved, I do seem to recall seeing a pie chart which set out the percentages of members at each of the "ranks", and, subdivided within that, the percentage of members who had never posted, or had made one post. If memory serves, they comprised a surprisingly large percentage of the overall membership of the entire forum.
Here is a 2014 post with some of those stats.
Here's a current chart. As we've noted before, only a small fraction of forum members have high post counts.
View attachment 886878
Never did understand why people join but don’t post. Understand the one post brigade. Obviously looking for a question to be answered.Here's a current chart. As we've noted before, only a small fraction of forum members have high post counts.
View attachment 886878
Never did understand why people join but don’t post. Understand the one post brigade. Obviously looking for a question to be answered.
I lurked and read threads for quite awhile before I joined. At the time I was contemplating purchasing my first smartphone.Perhaps the question was asked and answered before they had time to post?
Perhaps they had to psych themselves up to post?
This is the first online forum I ever joined, and I would never have contemplated joining had I not purchased an Apple computer - a MBP - for myself as a belated birthday present earlier that year, having had Windows machines before that, and, as a consequence, I had some questions that I wished to ask about Apple computers.
I will admit that before posting, I wasn't sure how my complete ignorance of such things would be regarded, whether my queries would be answered or derided, and whether it was a good idea to join the forum in the first place, rather than lurking, in the hope that someone else would ask the questions I wished answered, and that they would be answered without my needing to ask them under my own name, nom-de-plume that it was.
As against that, I did wish to obtain answers about my Apple MBP, and this seemed a good place to try, and I was also somewhat curious about the online world, as clearly this was going to comprise a considerable amount of interaction and engagement and communication over the coming decades.
Well, I asked my question(s) and was delighted, surprised and very pleased that complete strangers took time out of their lives to put me right, explain things to me, and ensure that I understood the stuff about my Apple computer that was bothering me.
And so, as I looked what I saw, (and experienced), I stayed, stayed to such an extent, that I became a pretty prolific poster, not something I would ever have envisaged happening when I first joined this forum.
I cannot speak for the entirety of MacRumors, but the PowerPC section which I frequent most and was my reason for registering, sees it's fair share of newbies who post once or twice and never again.Never did understand why people join but don’t post. Understand the one post brigade. Obviously looking for a question to be answered.
I lurked and read threads for quite awhile before I joined. At the time I was contemplating purchasing my first smartphone.
I found the site to be not only informative but warm and friendly.
I think you entered the forum at a time of transition. Us PowerPC forum users can tell you that by 2011-12 or so the Intel Mac forums were not so friendly - if you used a Mac that was anything more than a year old. It's one reason we have our own forum. You can only tell people so many times that the solution to their problem is to buy a new (modern) Mac before those people get the point and move on.This is the first online forum I ever joined, and I would never have contemplated joining had I not purchased an Apple computer - a MBP - for myself as a belated birthday present earlier that year, having had Windows machines before that, and, as a consequence, I had some questions that I wished to ask about Apple computers.
…
Well, I asked my question(s) and was delighted, surprised and very pleased that complete strangers took time out of their lives to put me right, explain things to me, and ensure that I understood the stuff about my Apple computer that was bothering me.
I think you entered the forum at a time of transition. Us PowerPC forums users can tell you that by 2011-12 or so the Intel Mac forums were not so friendly - if you used a Mac that was anything more than a year old. It's one reason we have our own forum. You can only tell people so many times that the solution to their problem is to buy a new (modern) Mac before those people get the point and move on.
As a courtesy, and because most of us own early Intel Macs now, we generally support questions about Intel Macs in the 2006-2010 years. The era of Intel Macs that would be ridiculed for having in the current Intel Mac forum.
I am typing this on a 2008 MBP. In my living room where I currently am, are Macs ranging from 1999 to 2006 (not including the aforementioned MBP). I am not counting the 2015 MBP issued to me by work as that's not mine. I did just recently purchase a new (to me) 2009 Mac Mini for $58Actually, at the moment, now that you mention it, the computer I am using (my trusty 11" CTO MBA) is all of six years old.....
I would imagine that an upgrade might be in store over the coming year or so.
However, I do try to give some of the wilder - and intemperate - areas of the forum a fairly wide berth.
I am typing this on a 2008 MBP. In my living room where I currently am, are Macs ranging from 1999 to 2006 (not including the aforementioned MBP). I am not counting the 2015 MBP issued to me by work as that's not mine. I did just recently purchase a new (to me) 2009 Mac Mini for $58
A lot of us have these older systems because an upgrade is not economically feasible. Many of the older systems can be had for under $200, most for under $100. So, the suggestion of "Get a new Mac" is ultimately unhelpful.
Therefore, like you, I avoid those sections of MacRumors.
I have joined the ranks of the 4,090.Here's a current chart. As we've noted before, only a small fraction of forum members have high post counts.
View attachment 886878
I have joined the ranks of the 4,090.
Um, woohoo?