Thanks a lot (sarcastically) Before now I was very content to have the normal hard drive. I was going to get the hard drive because I didnt think it would only make a little difference. Now I'm back on the fence deciding if I want the SSD. But 500 probably will be the factor the keeps me from getting it.
You notice SSD in all daily common tasks.
Other stuff like having 8gb ram or 16gb, a 1gb or 2gb video card probably never check any difference for most users.
SSD is expensive but worth it for me.
To be fair, is this a surprise?
Your title may as well be "Latest iMac fitted with the latest technology is fastest iMac yet".
Seems like some people and sites just have nothing to report on nowadays.
Maybe as I get older/old I can see the futility of chasing the next best and fastest syndrome. It reminds me very much of who's got the fastest car, manufacturers the world over know that if they dangle the carrot of "mine's faster than his" that it will sell more product. My C2D iMac is more than fast enough for my needs so I will leave the testosterone challenge to you younger ones - besides it's much cheaper once you can see the futility of the race.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; nl-nl) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)
Funny, those "i am happy with my config without ssd".. Whats the need to share this? ;p
SSD powered iMac in a few days on my desk. Cant wait
Hi john,
"The point is that the iMac has risen to become a credible alternative to the Mac Pro"
...not in the quality of its components.
Maybe as I get older/old I can see the futility of chasing the next best and fastest syndrome. It reminds me very much of who's got the fastest car, manufacturers the world over know that if they dangle the carrot of "mine's faster than his" that it will sell more product. My C2D iMac is more than fast enough for my needs so I will leave the testosterone challenge to you younger ones - besides it's much cheaper once you can see the futility of the race.
Holy Crud, $2,700 nowadays for a computer?
I know, it's a nice monitor, too, but still...
Makes me glad I hackintoshed with an SSD and saved some dough...
Made it 6 months ago (pre sandy bridge) but still very fast with an older i7. When you build it yourself, you don't overbuy on your SSD size (I have a partitioned 120 GB one, with Win7 and SL on 60GB partitions which are both less than half full).
SSDs ARE fantastic - it will be nice when the price is a bit less and we can get em in everything without breaking the bank.
Back in '98, I paid over $5,000 for a Gateway computer with dizzying specifications.*
400MHz CPU*
128 megs of RAM
14 gigs of hard drive
DVD reader
Ethernet
Can you believe it! Such power!!
It's still running. As a backup server with 384 megs of RAM and about a terabyte of disk. But it's about to be turned off when my iMac is up and running.
Oh, and I guess I could have saved money by stealing the operating system, but I didn't. It came with W 95 and the rights to a 98 upgrade.
Times have changed....
Yep.
Computers are far, far cheaper!!
And to reduce costs further, some are prepared to steal from Apple and even boast about it publicly.
Yep.
Computers are far, far cheaper!!
And to reduce costs further, some are prepared to steal from Apple and even boast about it publicly.