Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Imagine living in 2022 and thinking the election process cleanly represents the will of the people. There is lobbying, information asymmetry *1000, special interests, and a million other things between your vote and a law like this. What we do know is that when people vote with actual money very few of them care at all about lightning vs USBC. That’s the obvious and clear will or the people.

The corporate lobbying us much more apparent in some countries than others, not say where I live is perfect, but it's a bit more obvious in the US.

In the grand scheme of things, it's doesn't matter. A slow but growing momentum of people believe that common standards is the best way forward, ie EU Single Market applications, whereas in other areas of the world, there's more freedom to act against what everyone else does.
 
I'm really not trying to troll, but I honestly don't understand how a new standard could ever be adopted like this to replace USB C if companies are legally barred from releasing products with it. The standard they just adopted had 8 years of real world use before the EU agreed to make it law in 2 more years. How would that happen in this paradigm - can someone walk me through it?

Also what happens when China or some other large political entity decides to adopt their own standard?

As an aside, the original USB spec didn't even take off (at least in part) until Apple released the iMac, with NO legacy ports and no floppy slot.
 
ALL OF THEM SHOULD. Lightning was nice when it came out, but it is basically USB from 1992. The file sizes we use today, the expectations of interoperability, power delivery, etc. has rendered Lightning obsolete years ago.

And stop being innocent and defend Apple “this will stifle innovation”. No! Any consortium or corporation can come up with a better connector any time. Apple keeps Lightning around because they make money out of it, end of the story.
USB wasn't a thing until 1996! But you are right about the innovation argument.
 
I read so many comments, “no USB-C I skip iPhone 14”. Now they might “need” to skip iPhone 15 too.
I am super happy with my purple Pro Max 😃
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarkSam
I'm sure Apple is salivating at having to do this...

This of all the new products they will sell to people like me who will want all my products to be uniform in charging cables...
 
How would you DFU restore an otherwise bricked iPhone without the port?
Interestingly, Apple support made me restore my iPhone via DFU due to performance issues, so without a port, it would have been somewhat difficult to
 
does this mean that when a better standard gets created, a company is not allowed to use it until EU approves it and knowing the pace of political approvals, innovation will remain stagnant until that approval?
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
I was using Samsung between 2012 and 2020. Though I am always careful with my charging cables, I did get problem with Samsung USB cables and two times the phone had to repair. But, I am using my 12PM for the last two years and no problem with the cable or the phone's contact. Using USB-C never gave the confidence like Lightning. I always felt like something might get damaged while I connect it.
 
  • Love
Reactions: DarkSam
To be clear though, only *new* devices introduced after that date must use USB-C. An existing Lightning product can continue to be sold in the EU, even after the deadline.
Do you have the legal text? Normally how it works is every new device “produced” not “introduced” has to comply with the new regulation.

Otherwise manufacturers could keep selling the same device for years. maybe they gave the phone manufacturers certain concessions since this is not a regulation about security, just about convenience.
 
My bet is Apple ditches the port altogether and releases MagSafe 2 which charges as fast as current fast chargers somehow. Apple will start selling a wireless DAC that lets you plug regular headphones into it.
Could be but that doesn’t resolve the data rare problem. USB-C can currently support data rates up to 40 gigabit per second and the Max rate will soon hit 80. USB-C currently has charging throughout of up to 100 Watts, a rate MagSafe 2 will not get close to.
 
does this mean that when a better standard gets created, a company is not allowed to use it until EU approves it and knowing the pace of political approvals, innovation will remain stagnant until that approval?
Yes. There’s an investigation first though where the companies affected can participate if they like to on where they must provide their arguments as to why would it benefit the consumer to have several type of chargers, what does Lightning provides to the consumer that USB doesn’t.

I’m pretty sure Apple can’t say any benefits though.
 
I should have been clearer, I am not referring to the wireless charging on an iPhone. I'm talking about MagSafe on a laptop. It's a brilliant design, and saved me many times from pulling my laptop onto the floor. I don't see how they can continue using something like it with this legislation.
They could if they provide it in addition to USB-C power delivery I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mjs916 and I7guy
The innovation argument weak. The interoperability of power, wifi, networks significantly more important. The mess of Apple HomeKit and Airplay examples. Nice to have my Sonos app add my HomePod to their system. Nope, one way street for Airplay. Use Apple apps or do without. Not a fan of forced regulations but if manufacturers cannot get it done. So be it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mjs916
I'm going to make what I feel is a safe prediction...

iPhone SE3 moves from Lightning to USB-C by the middle of 2023. Call it SE3.5? Could even see some minor spec changes, more storage options, etc depending on market demand... I still feel safe in saying that there are plenty of iPhone users out there, with money to spend, that don't want a fully gesture-driven/home-buttonless UI/UX.. Apple will keep making a home button model at least through the end of 2023. Because, Apple likes to take peoples money. They don't want those users hanging onto their SE2s/3s until they can't update them anymore, see no hone button version available and say, "I may as well buy a flip phone".

Future iPhones (including future iPhone SE4) will be wireless data and charging only. No port at all. The wireless charger will have a USB-C connector, of course.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.