USB-C is an 8 1/2 year old form factor of a 26 year old port.The new rule will directly and most heavily impact Apple, which across a wide range of products, continues to use a decade-old port.
USB-C is an 8 1/2 year old form factor of a 26 year old port.The new rule will directly and most heavily impact Apple, which across a wide range of products, continues to use a decade-old port.
Imagine living in 2022 and thinking the election process cleanly represents the will of the people. There is lobbying, information asymmetry *1000, special interests, and a million other things between your vote and a law like this. What we do know is that when people vote with actual money very few of them care at all about lightning vs USBC. That’s the obvious and clear will or the people.
USB wasn't a thing until 1996! But you are right about the innovation argument.ALL OF THEM SHOULD. Lightning was nice when it came out, but it is basically USB from 1992. The file sizes we use today, the expectations of interoperability, power delivery, etc. has rendered Lightning obsolete years ago.
And stop being innocent and defend Apple “this will stifle innovation”. No! Any consortium or corporation can come up with a better connector any time. Apple keeps Lightning around because they make money out of it, end of the story.
Interestingly, Apple support made me restore my iPhone via DFU due to performance issues, so without a port, it would have been somewhat difficult toHow would you DFU restore an otherwise bricked iPhone without the port?
Do you have the legal text? Normally how it works is every new device “produced” not “introduced” has to comply with the new regulation.To be clear though, only *new* devices introduced after that date must use USB-C. An existing Lightning product can continue to be sold in the EU, even after the deadline.
Could be but that doesn’t resolve the data rare problem. USB-C can currently support data rates up to 40 gigabit per second and the Max rate will soon hit 80. USB-C currently has charging throughout of up to 100 Watts, a rate MagSafe 2 will not get close to.My bet is Apple ditches the port altogether and releases MagSafe 2 which charges as fast as current fast chargers somehow. Apple will start selling a wireless DAC that lets you plug regular headphones into it.
My thoughts exactly. I think by 2025 we will find that USB plugin chargers are becoming obsolete. Well done EU 🙄Let’s hope Apple ditch a charging port by the end of 2024!
Yes. There’s an investigation first though where the companies affected can participate if they like to on where they must provide their arguments as to why would it benefit the consumer to have several type of chargers, what does Lightning provides to the consumer that USB doesn’t.does this mean that when a better standard gets created, a company is not allowed to use it until EU approves it and knowing the pace of political approvals, innovation will remain stagnant until that approval?
Definitely agreeAdd the Apple TV remote to the list!
They could if they provide it in addition to USB-C power delivery I guess.I should have been clearer, I am not referring to the wireless charging on an iPhone. I'm talking about MagSafe on a laptop. It's a brilliant design, and saved me many times from pulling my laptop onto the floor. I don't see how they can continue using something like it with this legislation.
During its announcement in 2012, Phil Schiller called the Lightning port a "modern connector for the next decade."
Article Link: Top Lightning-Based Apple Products That Must Switch to USB-C by 2025 for EU Sale
Just a $10 adapter instead, right?You could just buy a cheap wired headset with a lightning connector, or a tiny adapter for your existing headphones - which is exactly what I did. This in no way required anyone to buy AirPods. 10000000%
Unless you buy all new stuff, you’ll… ummm… you’ll still have all those different types of cables.Good. I’m sick of all these different types of cables at my place.