I think that everyone will complain about the price increases but most will still buy the popular items.
Yep, you're probably right.
At the end of the day if price is too high customers won't buy. It's not like they'll magically have their budget + 20%. Real world for ordinary people doesn't work like that.
Many customers won't buy at certain price points. Some will, some simply won't.
And that's how it's SUPPOSED to work. I can afford a new car if it's a small Honda, Toyota, Nissan, or Hyundai. Or I can get a Acura, Lexus, Infiniti, Genesis, or Tesla if it's used and a few years old. But even though it's not beyond me, I'll never buy a Cadillac, Corvette, or pretty much a new anything.
The same goes for computing products. I don't buy used iPhones, Macbook Pros, Apple Watches, or iPads, but I lower my cost of ownership by keeping them longer. I've kept phones and watches for 3 to 4 years. If the prices go up enough, I'll extend my use of them for 5 years or more.
Hey, I already do that with my MBP (it's a 2021 model, and I'll keep it until the M7 comes out) and all of my Windows computers, which date back to 2012, 2018, and 2020, respectively. So I make 'em go another year or two. Or I only upgrade if I have one or more blockers to keeping an old device.
There is a huge difference between a MacBook Pro for 2500€ and 2900€. Sorry, Apple, but 400€ increase for MPro chipped laptops is not something I am ready to absorb. I guess my upgrade plan just got delayed far further into the future.
You think of it as a 400 euro increase (about $450 for us in the US), and you KNOW that's a lot of money.
But really, it's only a 16% increase over your old price of 2500 euros.
I say "only" because a lot of people won't even blink an eye at carrying a credit card balance with finance charges annualized at 20% to 24%. That's more than a one-time 16% increase in something. Or taking out payday loans for even more than that.
A lot of people won't be fazed at all by paying 40% to 80% more for groceries delivered by Instacart or for fast food delivered by Uber Eats or DoorDash.
More than 7 out of 10 people between the ages of 18 and 44 regularly order food for delivery, and think NOTHING of paying for the upcharges and the delivery fees. But 400 euros (or $450) causes you heartburn.
People not yet in their 50s are the people MOST impacted by the rising costs of everything. These are the people who are not yet in their highest earning years, which is typically your 50s and early 60s.
But yet, they don't see at all just how much money they waste on things like service fees and finance charges. Not saying this is you...but 70%....that could include you.
In publicly traded companies, most of A CEOs compensation is in stock. Tim Cook's total compensation for last year was $74.3 million (3 million base with the rest being stock awards and performance based incentives).
Apple is thought to sell 350 million items / year so the savings / item would be tiny even if Apple didn't pay Tim Cook anything.
You're right more than you know. Here's a fun math exercise.
Let's say Apple decided not only to NOT PAY Tim Cook for his last full year, but to also somehow confiscate the approximate $1.5 B that he's worth right now just to be mean and leave him penniless, then to give that money away to everybody in the world who currently have at least one Apple device in their home (about 1.3 billion), everybody would receive the equivalent of about 92 cents USD.
There's a lot less money in the world than we all realize.
Memory and storage prices have increased 400-500%. Not sure what everyone expects. Micron, Samsung, and Hynix are making bank at the expense of everyone. It was only 20 years ago that they were convicted of collusion and price fixing.
I don't remember the collusion and price fixing. But I also don't think there's evidence of that happening in the current era. After all, the whole AI thing just blasted off since Covid...so maybe from 2021 or 2022-ish. That's about 4 years ago when the growth began in earnest. That's not enough time to build even one fab plant. Passing the regulatory hurdles alone can take a dozen years, depending on where in the world you want to build it.
Why do companies keep pushing AI focused devices and chips?
There’s almost zero actual demand from the everyday person.
This is absolutely FALSE. "Almost zero", I would say might be less than 1%-2%, or 1 or 2 out of every 100 people.
A lot of people want it. I want it. There are probably hundreds of MacRumors members who also want it.
Demand might be anywhere from 10% to 40%. But that's a lot more than "almost zero".
Are they building a crowdsourced super AI?
I don't know what you're getting at for this comment.
Yeah! Like I don't consult Grok and Gemini two dozen times per day! Errr....
I use Alexa, Siri, and Google dozens of times each day, and most of those queries come back flagged as AI responses. I love it. My searches for information have never been more useful to me and to others than they are with even the most rudimentary form of AI that we have available right now!
Many people by iPhones through carrier subsidies, so those might not be affected as much. But many people will now think twice before buying an iPad or Mac. Vision Pro though will continue to sell like hotcakes. 🙄
lol on the Vision Pro quip! But yeah, I'll definitely think twice on bigger purchases. I'll probably move ahead with my M7 plans next year. But then, that will be a 6-year period that I will have had my M1 MBP in service, which is almost as long as I keep windows machines running.
I doubt that's true.
How can anyone in here defend money-grabbing Apple? It's pure greed. Capitalism at its ugliest.
Money grabbing? I've had Apple products ever since I bought the iPhone 5 years ago. I'm pretty sure that Apple has never reached in my pockets and just "grabbed" my money. Yes, they do charge me for iCloud, but I kind of gave my permission for that, lol!
[In response to Doug_in_the-UK above]
Your statement doesn't make sense. Apple always charged money for their products. At what point does it turn into "Pure greed". Apple was holding back on their price increases for a long time. They even released a really cheap Macbook while everyone knew memory prices were going way up.
Pricing theory would suggest that Apple should have gradually increased retail prices over the past year to soften the blow, rather they held and held and held keeping prices stable. Sounds like they were doing the opposite of "Pure Greed".
They WERE doing the opposite of "Pure Greed (TM)". But as the saying goes, "no good deed goes unpunished."
Now is the time to make a bullet list of price hikes (value and %), product by product. AI bots shine at that
This would be interesting.
The price increases make you look harder at what you already have. I just bought an iPhone 17 to beat any potential increases there but I’m very happy with my Mini M1 so that will not get upgraded now. Not just the removal of the basic setup but an increase as well.
The price increases could actually push me toward doing a trade-in of my old gear for new stuff.
According to the Financial Times, the price hikes cost Apple $263bn in market cap.
If that's true, then their market cap of $4.17 Trillion as of Friday's market close would make that a decline in market cap of about 6%. Not fun, no. But also not all THAT unusual either.
it’s funny people cheering capitalism when it’s successful but when it’s failing for the customers and they blame capitalism.
Capitalism requires a few things to be called "capitalism". Here are the top five of those things:
- Private Property Rights
- Profit Motive
- Market Competition
- Freedom of Choice and Enterprise
- Minimal Government Intervention
This list came from Masterclass, to which I have a subscription. But if you'd like a free source all about Capitalism, I would highly recommend the free classes at Hillsdale College. They have over 40 classes on everything ranging from government, free enterprise, the history of America, music, and much much more. My favorites included the Capitalism course, along with the courses on the great music composers as well as the course on ancient Sparta and Athens.
It's free. Even an anti-capitalist has to appreciate that, right?
I wonder what Apples profits will be?
What's your point? Operating in the free market means you set your price and your customer can decide for himself or herself if the thing they're buying will be worth that price.
My work involves the purchase for client archives of dozens of hard drives a month. Prices have more than doubled in the last 6 months. These prices increase were inevitable and are going to track through any device or company that uses memory. Frankly I am surprised the price increases were not larger.
Oh for sure, I too thought that the price increases would have been a lot bigger.
I saw the tide shifting and started buying from the other guys. I still love the iPad and even picked up a new M5 last year, but I’m gradually moving on. This is just one more reason why. 🤷
The price increases are a global thing. They'll hit Samsung too. And everybody else who makes a gadget that competes with Apple's gadgets.
What was Cook's bonus increase? How much of an effect would declining it have actually had on the price hikes? I can't imagine more than pennies. Maybe you're more taking about optics.
Some people are 100% about the optics. They might even acknowledge that this person or that company "did the right thing", but get mad at the choice of words in the press release. Or something they perceived as "a mean tweet".