Calm down, you haven't wasted anything. If I had an AWU1, I'd still use it. I'd use it for when I'm out in the garden or under the car. I generally don't need AI to help me water my tomato and pepper plants!
Hey, it's fun to use hyperbole whenever we're mad about something. "Main perpetrators"...we can all do that! Seriously, name-calling like that is pretty much a national sport...anywhere.
I know one young person who's entire job is based on using AI and incorporating it into software products.
While this is certainly possible, it's also possible that Apple would reduce prices when the price of memory (or whatever) goes down.
But in general, you're right. The high cost of memory is probably NOT going to decline anytime soon. Memory is used for memory AND hard drives (SSDs). Demand is high and supply is low. If prices didn't go up, we would just end up with disruptive shortages, rather than demand attenuated based on what people are willing to (or not willing to) pay.
It's hard to build even one fab anywhere in the world, so prices are going to stay high until supply can be increased.
Capitalism is all about buyer and seller AGREEING to a price, and both buyer and seller feel that they have benefited more from the transaction than what they gave up. You might not like the high price of something, but if prices aren't being dictated by some government entity and you still AGREE to pay it, then you are participating in Capitalsim.
Unfortunately, a lot of people feel exactly that way.
In order for a company to not only be successful, but to have access to financial and credit markets down the road, they NEED to grow their profit margins. And they need to grow those margins exponentially, quarter after quarter.
If they don't, then they're just "so-so", and the biggest financial institutions basically ignore them.
"...way too high for most people outside the USA."
You say that like it's a bad thing. It is neither bad nor good. It's just a fact, and it has always been so.
It has ALWAYS been the case, from the very first Apple product. It has ALWAYS been true that "most people" can't afford Apple products.
Apple has never been "the affordable brand". Why do you think they should be?
According to the AI search results I just got, it can take 1 to 3 years just to get through regulatory and administrative hurdles. THEN your 3-5 year construction phase starts. And everything stops when they find the rare "snow thrush" lays eggs 50 miles away but in the same state.
It can easily take 10 years or more to build any fab plant anywhere in the USA.
I like that. I have a big box of watches somewhere around here. They all need batteries. Maybe I can get a couple of them cleaned up and re-energized.
There's always somebody willing to buy a cheap device.
I hear Pixel phones take really good photos. But over the years, I've always upgraded my iPhone based mostly on the quality of the camera. I went from iPhone 6 to 12, then from 12 to 16. And now I'm waiting to see what Fold has to offer. But I probably won't upgrade to it if it doesn't have a good camera.
People love to use inflammatory language when describing something they don't like. It's natural, and I do it too. It's a sport!
You should look up the meaning of the words "perpetrator", "palpable", and "hypocritical".
But hey, you're pretty good at verbal hyperbole. I respect that.
And no, none of this is "Apple's fault". Puh-lease! 😉
It's not supposed to be pretty. Or ugly. It just is.
"Don't buy unless absolutely necessary, and then buy the cheapest stuff you find." This is not a bad reasoning. But it's not for everybody. For example,
I'll upgrade my iPhone when a camera significantly better than my current iPhone 16s camera becomes available. Is this "absolutely necessary" for me? No. So your strategy doesn't apply to me.
And for the second part: "buy the cheapest stuff you find." Well, the cheapest I can find won't meet my requirements for camera quality or the apps I can run. So THAT strategy doesn't apply to me either.
And I absolutely do want to reward capitalism! Capitalism ensures that we have good (or even excellent products) available, and that we are free to buy them if we want them.
Capitalism is indicated by buyer and seller FREELY engaging in a transaction. And property ownership. As the buyer, I own my money. As the seller, a manufacturer has ownership of the thing they want to sell.
Both parties will come away feeling that they got the better deal in the arrangement.
The buyer feels he or his situation is made better by the product he purchased than by the money he had and gave up to purchase it. This is certainly how I felt whenever I've bought an Apple product in the past!
The seller feels he or his situation is made better by the money he received than by the product that he made and gave up to get the money. I can't speak for Apple (and in a couple of cases, Verizon too), but they keep selling me products, so they MUST feel bettered by our transactions.
All I can say is YAY CAPITALISM!