What do you think the chances are that Apple will pull a 180 and implement these in their upcoming iPad release? It would strengthen their competition against netbooks, which generally have larger hard drives. It certainly would blow away the current and upcoming tablet market, which range from 16-64 gigs of storage
"everything we learned from the Air...which we subsequently learned from the original iPad...has brought us here"
thoughts?
What do you think the chances are that Apple will pull a 180 and implement these in their upcoming iPad release? It would strengthen their competition against netbooks, which generally have larger hard drives. It certainly would blow away the current and upcoming tablet market, which range from 16-64 gigs of storage
"everything we learned from the Air...which we subsequently learned from the original iPad...has brought us here"
thoughts?
I would not mind these going in the next MacBook Pro's as long as they replace the missing space with more batteries![]()
I would not mind these going in the next MacBook Pro's as long as they replace the missing space with more batteries![]()
at least we know we can replace the ssd's in 3-4 years. If you use your air that long...
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8B117)
So is the maximum capacity still 256GB? Can't go any higher with these?
I wouldn't mind if they have 512GB or higher available. I'm expecting MacBook Pros to have 1T available soon, 256GB would be too little for a person who wants to edit video on their 15" or 17" MBP.
These so-called "blades" have been growing for some time. Runcore makes some fast ones going back a few years.
![]()
Growing length of "blades" is nothing new.
That would be great, except for the tiny little fact that you couldn't give me a Dell Mini 9!Yeah, my 2008 - Dell Mini 9 has a 16GB "blade"
Apple's whole "we took it out of the case" thing is just a bunch of B.S. It's nothing new.
However, both MBA models are exactly the same thickness, so I would imagine there is room. Apple probably just wanted to differentiate the models.
The MBA is meant as a companion/2nd computer, so it can get away w/ smallish storage. Most buy a MBP as a primary computer, or at least a primary laptop. I have a 13" MBP w/ SSD that IS a 2nd computer. I love it to death, and will never travel w/ my 15" ever again, but w/ only 120GB of internal storage I can't use the 13" as my primary.
For a laptop 512gb would suit my needs greatly.
What would be cool with using these in a laptop - removal of the HDD would allow for more battery, dual CPU's (think what I could do with 8 cores in a laptop), more ram, better graphics, or whatever.
We seemed to have plateaued in technology and options until now. Now, I think we will be improving even more.
So you're saying the 256GB version may not fit in the 11" MBA? That'd suck.But the rate of taper is greater on the smaller model. The SSD card is not at the back so there is less thickness where the SSD is on the 11"
Don't you worry baby doll, we'll have 2x256GB RAID0 on the new MBP![]()
What I really want is someone <Points at OCZ> to release some faster ones, with 512GB capacity. That I'd buy.
No one would/should be editing video straight from the computer. I'd suggest most (except the Joe iMovie goer) would have externals hooked up by Firewire to hold the footage.
Check the link on weckart's post above:Currently when most laptops use HDD I can see that. I'm thinking about the future: if you had an SSD RAID array in your MBP then why wouldn't you be able to take your laptop with you and edit on site, your storage would be faster and more reliable than HDD based laptops. You could have a lighter set of equipment to carry with you, then backup your project to external drives later on when shooting is done.
Of course if you don't plan to edit on site or like bringing external drives along, then it doesn't matter.
My point is that I am sure some would like more than 512GB on a MBP and SSD would be safer than a huge HDD.
Check the link on weckart's post above:
OCZ 480GB Vertex 2E SSD - Solid State Drive (scan.co.uk): £1,330.92 = approx. US$2,150!!!
And that's in a 2.5" drive-shaped form factor!
Edit: BTW, if you can afford that kind of jack on a pair of SSDs, OWC makes a caddy that replaces the optical drive with a 2.5" SATA drive bracket: OWC "Data Doubler" bracket (macsales.com)
...OCZ 480GB Vertex 2E SSD - Solid State Drive (scan.co.uk): £1,330.92 = approx. US$2,150!!!
And that's in a 2.5" drive-shaped form factor!...
About SSD in RAID 0 have you checked the Vaio Z? Has Quad RAID 0 SSDs.
That's interesting. I'd assumed that SSD lifetime had been fixed for all practical purposes by writing algorithms.